Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19
  1. #1
    spdolphs's Avatar
    spdolphs is offline Training Camp
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    48

    Would still be winning with Culpepper in...

    Sure, Brad Johnson is experienced, has a ring....etc...but look at the rest of the team. The O Line is finally giving the QB time to pass, and the Defense has stepped up and is earning their money!

    Just think what would be happening if you had a QB that could run like Culpepper can when he is healthy. I don't think it has been Daunte, but the rest of the team. It is finally coming together, and all due respect to Brad Johnson, I am anxious to see this team next year with a healthy Culpepper.

    Just my opinion, I could be wrong......

  2. #2
    VKG4LFE's Avatar
    VKG4LFE is offline Jersey Retired Tetris Champion, Monkey GO Happy 4 Champion
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Hartford, WI
    Posts
    16,013

    Re: Would still be winning with Culpepper in...

    Wait a minute, did you see that 15 yard run Johnson had last week against the pack on the first drive! Nuff said!! lol jk

    I get the most pissed off looks from people with my VKG 4 LFE Wisconsin license plate, and I LOVE IT!!

  3. #3
    magicci's Avatar
    magicci is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    oxnard, ca
    Posts
    5,440

    Re: Would still be winning with Culpepper in...

    I really wanna see what Daunte could do with Koren Robinson and a more experienced Troy.

  4. #4
    midgensa's Avatar
    midgensa is offline Jersey Retired Free Kick Specialist 3 Champion
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,317

    Re: Would still be winning with Culpepper in...

    I actually do think we win all four of these games with Culpepper in. We got the lead in all four games, and Culpepper plays well with the lead. He may have had some trouble in Green Bay with pressing, but he always torched the Packers. As far as the Giants game I think we would have put some points on the board offensively actually because there were at least three major underthrows by BJ in that game ... of course the whole game changes, but I think we win that one as well.
    I am not gonna take any credit from BJ though. Culpepper is NOT in there and BJ IS and he is doing everything right.
    I am interested to see what this team looks like with a major playmaker at QB like Daunte and with the defense as gelled as it seems to be. Also with Birk back and a solidfied line ... we could be looking at really good things next season.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,167

    Re: Would still be winning with Culpepper in...

    "spdolphs" wrote:
    I could be wrong......
    I agree.
    Even babies know the difference.

  6. #6
    midgensa's Avatar
    midgensa is offline Jersey Retired Free Kick Specialist 3 Champion
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,317

    Re: Would still be winning with Culpepper in...

    "magicci" wrote:
    I really wanna see what Daunte could do with Koren Robinson and a more experienced Troy.
    Definitely, he looked like he was already clicking a little with Troy anyways ... next year Troy could already be the number one receiver on this team ...

  7. #7
    spdolphs's Avatar
    spdolphs is offline Training Camp
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    48

    Re: Would still be winning with Culpepper in...

    "VKG4LFE" wrote:
    Wait a minute, did you see that 15 yard run Johnson had last week against the pack on the first drive! Nuff said!! lol jk
    B. Johnson....14 years, 570 rushing yards.

    D. Culpepper.....7 years, 2476 rushing yards.

    I rest my case.... :evil3:

    Beers on me! ccasion5:

  8. #8
    gregair13's Avatar
    gregair13 is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Edmonton, AB
    Posts
    14,597

    Re: Would still be winning with Culpepper in...

    i think we would still have won these 4 games with daunte in. and i think we would ahve won them by more poitns than we did.
    We're bringing purple back.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,167

    Re: Would still be winning with Culpepper in...

    I like Daunte. But, the reality of the situation is that we had a 2-5 record with him as our starter. Brad came in and we are now 4-0 (with the same patchwork O-line). The "maybes" the "mights" the "what-ifs" & the "what-coulda beens" are great, but they don't win games. Neither do QB rushing stats. Brad is our QB and he is undefeated as our starter so far. He is calm, smart, experienced and has a Super Bowl ring. I'm glad he is our QB right now and I'm very happy how the team is performing with him at the helm. The only regret I have is that I just wish we wouldn't have lost so many games early in the season. But, other than that, I'm living in the present and loving it.
    Even babies know the difference.

  10. #10
    VKG4LFE's Avatar
    VKG4LFE is offline Jersey Retired Tetris Champion, Monkey GO Happy 4 Champion
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Hartford, WI
    Posts
    16,013

    Re: Would still be winning with Culpepper in...

    I like winning. Whatever it takes!

    I get the most pissed off looks from people with my VKG 4 LFE Wisconsin license plate, and I LOVE IT!!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Winning just enough not good enough
    By COJOMAY in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 10-06-2008, 05:15 PM
  2. Winning a cure for all the buffoonery
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-11-2006, 01:17 PM
  3. Listen to the winning kick
    By COJOMAY in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 10-30-2005, 03:11 AM
  4. Vikings winning recipe
    By parsongeorge in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-03-2005, 08:17 AM
  5. blueprint for winning!!
    By TheAnimal93 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-18-2004, 09:18 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •