Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Reinholds,Pa
    Posts
    225

    Wilson looks like Tark

    Run run run back throw it away no sack
    None

  2. #2
    Reignman is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    629
    And Kaepernick reminds me of Joe Webb. Same throwing motion and run threat.

  3. #3
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,266
    Wilson looks like Tark
    Wilson has "fish eyes"?

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  4. #4
    Purple Floyd's Avatar
    Purple Floyd is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    16,646
    Blog Entries
    1
    I will say one thing- He looks like the real deal.

    Funny how a rookie QB like that can look when compared to what we have been programmed to expect from a young QB and even with Bevell calling the plays.

  5. #5
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,916
    Tark could win on the road.
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

  6. #6
    tastywaves's Avatar
    tastywaves is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,869
    Beware of rookie seasons with QB's.

  7. #7
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,916
    Quote Originally Posted by tastywaves View Post
    Beware of rookie seasons with QB's.
    LOL, I have Newton on one of my fantasy teams......

    RG III was fun to watch this weekend when he couldn't run and was forced to play QB and Luck has worse stats than Ponder. I wonder what he would look like without Reggie Wayne? Probably just as bad, or worse than Ponder without Harvin.
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

  8. #8
    tastywaves's Avatar
    tastywaves is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,869
    Quote Originally Posted by Marrdro View Post
    LOL, I have Newton on one of my fantasy teams......

    RG III was fun to watch this weekend when he couldn't run and was forced to play QB and Luck has worse stats than Ponder. I wonder what he would look like without Reggie Wayne? Probably just as bad, or worse than Ponder without Harvin.
    I think Luck and RGIII are as good as advertised. We can argue about how well they are playing this year, but watching them play it is clear to me that they have the talent to succeed. I also think they will both have long term success in this league providing they can stay healthy (especially RGIII).

    Ponder is another story, he still has a lot to prove in my eyes.

  9. #9
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,916
    Quote Originally Posted by tastywaves View Post
    I think Luck and RGIII are as good as advertised. We can argue about how well they are playing this year, but watching them play it is clear to me that they have the talent to succeed. I also think they will both have long term success in this league providing they can stay healthy (especially RGIII).

    Ponder is another story, he still has a lot to prove in my eyes.
    Well, I guess, but if you take their best WR away, I'm wondering if you would feel the same. Heck, Lucks numbers aren't really that great. Sure, more yards, more TD's, but lower completion percentage and 1/3 more INT's.

    RG III is another story, but I think that if you take away his ability to run the offense (make him a passer) like they had to last weekend, teams wouldn't have as many problems with him and that's if you let him keep his top receiver.
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

  10. #10
    tastywaves's Avatar
    tastywaves is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,869
    Quote Originally Posted by Marrdro View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by tastywaves View Post
    I think Luck and RGIII are as good as advertised. We can argue about how well they are playing this year, but watching them play it is clear to me that they have the talent to succeed. I also think they will both have long term success in this league providing they can stay healthy (especially RGIII).

    Ponder is another story, he still has a lot to prove in my eyes.
    Well, I guess, but if you take their best WR away, I'm wondering if you would feel the same. Heck, Lucks numbers aren't really that great. Sure, more yards, more TD's, but lower completion percentage and 1/3 more INT's.

    RG III is another story, but I think that if you take away his ability to run the offense (make him a passer) like they had to last weekend, teams wouldn't have as many problems with him and that's if you let him keep his top receiver.
    I believe that receiver was there last year as well, along with Garcon, yet they only managed two wins.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •