Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28
  1. #21
    napo58's Avatar
    napo58 is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    394

    Re: Williamson may remain inactive

    mike tice is a freaking idiot. Doesnt know what the hell he is doing. We should be deactivating rosenthal, the guy is complete garbage. We should keep troy williamson in, he is our best deep threat and can make plays all over the field. Just another reason why tice and his crew wil be gone next year along with rosenthal, liwenski, withrow, chavous, cowart and goldberg.

  2. #22
    Mikecarter81's Avatar
    Mikecarter81 is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    823

    Re: Williamson may remain inactive

    I have to support Tice on this. I mean the way all three of our Wide outs played last week, it would be tough for T will to get any playtime. Plus it is true Liewinski always plays detroit tough.

    Mike

    Yet I'm sad to see Toniu on IR that sucks!
    I am an avid Viking fan, but also am an avid restoration guy of vintage Mopar(Chrysler, Dodge, Plymouth)B bodies

  3. #23
    ThorSPL's Avatar
    ThorSPL is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    3,422

    Re: Williamson may remain inactive

    Discipline is important - I think he's teaching TW a lesson... we're not missing much by him sitting and the lesson ought to teach him something.


    Trust me, I'm a doctor.

    www.twitter.com/ThorSPL

  4. #24
    GreenBaySlackers's Avatar
    GreenBaySlackers is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,249

    Re: Williamson may remain inactive

    "napo58" wrote:
    mike tice is a freaking idiot. Doesnt know what the hell he is doing. We should be deactivating rosenthal, the guy is complete garbage. We should keep troy williamson in, he is our best deep threat and can make plays all over the field. Just another reason why tice and his crew wil be gone next year along with rosenthal, liwenski, withrow, chavous, cowart and goldberg.

    all of which have played considerably better than your boy Harris...

  5. #25
    VikingsTw is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,144

    Re: Williamson may remain inactive

    You know Chavous is actually playing pretty good football, its not like he's really putting his name out there but its not like he's getting burned every series like he was last year. I would like to see him make more plays, i'm definitly not begging for him back next year, i would like to see offord get his shot but he's got serious injury problems.

  6. #26
    ItalianStallion's Avatar
    ItalianStallion is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,615

    Re: Williamson may remain inactive

    Chavous is good, but not worth more than 2 million a year. Rosenthal blows, Withrow blows, Cowart hasn't stood out at all this season, GOldberg is average but he is yound and getting better, Liwenski is decent but has played poorly this year.


    I m like a Ja Rule poster, cause I'm off the wall.

  7. #27
    napo58's Avatar
    napo58 is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    394

    Re: Williamson may remain inactive

    what the hell is wrong with Napoleon Harris?? he should be the best linebacker on our team!!!!!!!!!! He has so much freaking talent it makes me wonder as why the hell is he deactivated??? This really is pissing me off.

  8. #28
    snowinapril's Avatar
    snowinapril is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    13,404

    Re: Williamson may remain inactive

    I think right now in the offense that we have, T-Will is the odd man out because he doesn't run routes as well as the other guys. With Brad at QB, he needs guys that run routes well within 20 yards. T-Will was in to run deep.

    I agree with Singer, I don't think that T-Will is in the DOGHOUSE. It just makes sense right now. The one thing that seems to be true, is that Tice doesn't like to rush the rookies along.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Similar Threads

  1. Vikings inactive players
    By FuadFan in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-08-2008, 06:06 PM
  2. What's up with Moore inactive?
    By COJOMAY in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 09-13-2007, 02:53 AM
  3. Why was Edwards inactive?
    By UndisputedVike in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-13-2006, 08:00 PM
  4. Branch listed as inactive
    By Purple Floyd in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-16-2006, 08:14 PM
  5. Hovan Inactive?
    By VikingsTw in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 11-29-2004, 09:20 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •