Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. 04-23-2012, 05:59 PM #1
    Lippythelion69's Avatar
    Lippythelion69
    Lippythelion69 is offline Starter
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Reinholds,Pa
    Posts
    157

    Why not public shares?

    Is there any reason the Vikings can't do what green bay does...sell shares to the public?
    Is there a down side for Wilf?
    I would buy shares. as im sure all of us would if possible .
    It isn't going to make or break the deal...in the lastest offering gb raised 67 million .
    And there are way more Viking fans....
    But It is a bad time to do it they would have to stay in Minn.
    aaaaaaaaccccccckkkkkkkkkkkkk
    Last edited by Lippythelion69; 04-23-2012 at 06:06 PM.
    None
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 04-23-2012, 06:41 PM #2
    i_bleed_purple's Avatar
    i_bleed_purple
    i_bleed_purple is offline Jersey Retired
    Send a message via MSN to i_bleed_purple Send a message via Skype™ to i_bleed_purple
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canadialand
    Posts
    16,483
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Lippythelion69 View Post
    Is there any reason the Vikings can't do what green bay does...sell shares to the public?
    Is there a down side for Wilf?
    I would buy shares. as im sure all of us would if possible .
    It isn't going to make or break the deal...in the lastest offering gb raised 67 million .
    And there are way more Viking fans....
    But It is a bad time to do it they would have to stay in Minn.
    aaaaaaaaccccccckkkkkkkkkkkkk
    It is against nfl rules. Packers are the exception as they were this way before the rule was put into effect
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« White Earth Proposal? | House rejects Vikings stadium proposal »

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules