01-05-2014, 08:14 AM #31
2beers you seem to be under the impression that people who run companies don't keep track of what the people who work for them are doing, nor should they. I got news for you, people who run companies and are paying out millions in salary require those that are getting that money to report to them on a regular basis as to what they are up to and why.
I agree that during a game you don't call down to the field from the booth and tell your coach what plays to call, however I have never heard of the Wilfs doing that.
Last edited by RK.; 01-05-2014 at 08:20 AM.
01-05-2014, 03:00 PM #32I bet you could use a cool one huh Clark...Now you're talkin Eddie...
01-05-2014, 07:40 PM #33
BUT, they are not criminals because it was a civil suit haha
01-05-2014, 09:16 PM #34
01-06-2014, 01:25 PM #35
They were never found guilty of committing any crimes. If you are referring to the racketeering statement by the judge, there is civil as well as criminal racketeering. The judge has no ability to rule or comment on any criminal activity because this was not a criminal case.
Not saying one way or the other if the Wilf's are guilty terrible human beings, just saying that it is pretty hard to have strong feelings one way or the other based on the information reported.