LA was not the only place. San Antonio TX also had its hat in the ring as well as a couple other places.Quote:
Of course they did...look at the track record LA has with NFL teams.
At the time there were a number of sports pundits that said that Chilly was among the top assistant coach candidates to be given a shot at a head coaching job. Also in here I think you will find that there are many of us that are against almost anything that is done at any given time. LOLQuote:
Top pick by WHO?!?!?!? Chiller was an OC who had NEVER CALLED A PLAY!!! Not at the UW, not in Philly. And, if you look back, I think you'll find that MANY of us were completely AGAINST the Childress hire for exactly that reason.
Besides that you somehow are missing the whole point of this post....The Wilfs are not a good selling point for a prospective business transaction with a prospective coach.
Slips on sidewalk? Huh?
You sound like the Wilfs PR guy.
It was always a civil suit all the way. They are not criminals. I seriously doubt there is anyone on this site who knows more about the New Jersey code of criminal justice than I do. I'm not an expert on financial crime or the Wilfs' business practices, but I know that the Wilfs were never charged criminally or even subject to a criminal investigation. Liars, cheats, shysters, probably, but they are by definition, not criminals.
And if an owner is willing to pay for players and offers a coach a good contract, why does the coach care about the owners' non-football business ventures? They've given both of the coaches they've hired time to succeed, too much in fact.
The lack of a stadium and lack of a QB are the real red flags for coaches considering coming here.
If you hire a certain coach for x amount of dollars over x amount of years, you pay x amount of dollars no matter how long he coached for. Coaches contracts are guaranteed.
So to think that a certain coach wouldn't come here because they are worried about being ripped of by the owner is highly doubtful.
well, with the QB cluster fuck that the Vikes just went thru, Frazier said that he let the GM and the Wilfs know who was going to start from week to week. Alright, the GM, I can kind of understand..kind of, but why are the Wilfs involved with his conversations? From my understanding, Frazier didn't want Freeman there, but Spielman did, so what does Frazier do the 1st week Freeman is there? He throws him to the wolves, which in my opinion was a big FU to Spielman. But going back to the Wilfs, why does Frazier have to inform them who the starter is???
Spielman is doing an extensive search for a head coach who will buy in to his program. Who wants to work for Spielman?