Who should start at QB against the Chargers? Jackson back on track to start

**Frostbite** · 10-30-2007, 10:38 PM

Bollinger deserves a second chance as a starter this week. I am pretty sure T.Jack will not be available and with Holcomb down What else do we have?? Some folks have been talking about the possible signing of Jeff George?? Not a terrible idea at this point but the trainers better have plenty of "Ensure" ready for Jeff at the Half if he should by some some chance get signed and actually be able to play Sunday.

Cheers!

**DaVizzles** · 10-30-2007, 10:42 PM

Jeff George! Jeff George! Jeff George! Jeff George! Jeff George!

We should sign George and if he doesnt lead us to a couple of wins just bench him and play TJ the rest of the season so see if he is the real deal.

**RK.** · 10-31-2007, 02:34 AM

I don't think it matters who starts at QB.
If we can't beat the hapless Eagles we are not going to win against the Chargers.

**midgensa** · 10-31-2007, 02:45 AM

We have to play T-Jack ... and should probably look to play him as much as possible the rest of the year. We need to see if there is ANY chance this kid can improve ... it is just not realistic to think that Bollinger or Holcomb give us much of a chance to win or a future. While T-Jack may not give us a much better chance to win this season ... we can at least give him as much time as possible and see if he has any sort of future.

**El Vikingo** · 10-31-2007, 05:25 AM

I ve voted for Brad Bollinger,he must be some free agent or something we have got recently,I am anxious to see him in action ......

**Purple Floyd** · 10-31-2007, 07:40 AM

I think we should put Childress in there at QB for this game. Why?

He is probably at least 5 years younger than Jeff George ;D

He knows the playbook

After getting beaten like a red headed stepchild for a game he might lobby stronger for fixing the line

**Marrdro** · 10-31-2007, 07:47 AM

"UffDaVikes" wrote:

I think we should put Childress in there at QB for this game. Why?

He is probably at least 5 years younger than Jeff George ;D

He knows the playbook

After getting beaten like a red headed stepchild for a game he might lobby stronger for fixing the line

All great points, especially the last one.
;D

**singersp** · 10-31-2007, 07:55 AM

"Marrdro" wrote:

"UffDaVikes" wrote:

I think we should put Childress in there at QB for this game. Why?

He is probably at least 5 years younger than Jeff George ;D

He knows the playbook

After getting beaten like a red headed stepchild for a game he might lobby stronger for fixing the line

All great points, especially the last one.

;D

Bevell would have to prevent him from calling audibles.

**Marrdro** · 10-31-2007, 08:12 AM

"singersp" wrote:

"Marrdro" wrote:

"UffDaVikes" wrote:

I think we should put Childress in there at QB for this game. Why?

He is probably at least 5 years younger than Jeff George ;D

He knows the playbook

After getting beaten like a red headed stepchild for a game he might lobby stronger for fixing the line

All great points, especially the last one.

;D

Bevell would have to prevent him from calling audibles.

Ohhhhhh my goodness.
This is gonna be a fun day.
;D

**ejmat** · 10-31-2007, 11:24 AM

"Marrdro" wrote:

"singersp" wrote:

"Marrdro" wrote:

"UffDaVikes" wrote:

I think we should put Childress in there at QB for this game. Why?

He is probably at least 5 years younger than Jeff George ;D

He knows the playbook

After getting beaten like a red headed stepchild for a game he might lobby stronger for fixing the line

All great points, especially the last one.

;D

Bevell would have to prevent him from calling audibles.

Ohhhhhh my goodness.
This is gonna be a fun day.

;D

My first laughs of the day.