Thread: Where's the 'Long' in Longwell?
-
Re: Where's the 'Long' in Longwell?
"Tarkenator" wrote:
I think the reason that call was made was because of the missed extra point, if we were ahead at that point with the defence playing as well as they were punting would have been the decision. I'm not too sure why Kluwe is holding on the kicks, last year Brad was doing it even when he was starting, if there is a bad snap I'd rather have the ball in the hands of a QB than a punter."Json" wrote:
Yeah, I didn't like that call either.As long as he keeps kicking game winners I'm cool.
I think Childress should have punted rather then having him attempt that 54 yard field goal but I'm not the coach so it is what it is.
That and they still won so who am I to complain?
:
It put us in a vulnarable position.
I think he was very confident in our defense.
It definitely showed our hand to other teams as to Longwell's current capabilities.
-
09-15-2006, 06:04 PM #12
Re: Where's the 'Long' in Longwell?
T. Jackson holding would have been a good option if he had practice as the holder.
I think he could have run that extra point in."Puntalee-wuntalee, yesiree-bob!"
-
09-15-2006, 06:18 PM #13
Re: Where's the 'Long' in Longwell?
"Tarkenator" wrote:
I was thinking the same thing when it happened. Kluwe almost made it, but it would have been sweet to watch TJ run that in for a Viking touchdown!T. Jackson holding would have been a good option if he had practice as the holder.
I think he could have run that extra point in.
-
09-15-2006, 06:58 PM #14
Re: Where's the 'Long' in Longwell?
"Deronn" wrote:
I don't understand why they don't use him or another player with a good arm & legs. It comes in handy for situations like this & leaves the option open for faking a field goal"Tarkenator" wrote:
I was thinking the same thing when it happened. Kluwe almost made it, but it would have been sweet to watch TJ run that in for a Viking touchdown!T. Jackson holding would have been a good option if he had practice as the holder.
I think he could have run that extra point in.
& going for 6 or 2 point conversions.
"If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"
-
09-15-2006, 07:05 PM #15
Re: Where's the 'Long' in Longwell?
"singersp" wrote:
EXACTLY!"Deronn" wrote:
I don't understand why they don't use him or another player with a good arm & legs. It comes in handy for situations like this & leaves the option open for faking a field goal"Tarkenator" wrote:
I was thinking the same thing when it happened. Kluwe almost made it, but it would have been sweet to watch TJ run that in for a Viking touchdown!T. Jackson holding would have been a good option if he had practice as the holder.
I think he could have run that extra point in.
& going for 6 or 2 point conversions.
It just gives them another option on the play that they DON'T have with Kluwe taking the snap.
Makes sense to me, but then again what the heck do I know!
Similar Threads
-
Get Rid Of Longwell!
By COJOMAY in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 54Last Post: 10-23-2007, 01:47 PM -
Longwell Makes Changes
By singersp in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 11Last Post: 09-08-2007, 02:47 PM -
Longwell - "Player of the Week"
By singersp in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 10Last Post: 09-20-2006, 02:38 PM -
How long is too long, Part 2
By Braddock in forum The ClubhouseReplies: 5Last Post: 07-24-2006, 05:01 PM -
Longwell visiting MN
By iluvbigtds in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA ForumReplies: 43Last Post: 03-12-2006, 12:49 AM



Reply With Quote







Bookmarks