Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24
  1. #1
    BBQ Platypus's Avatar
    BBQ Platypus is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Saint Paul, MN
    Posts
    3,027

    Well, we split the season series

    Way to go, Pack! And you ACTUALLY WON this time! :cheers:


    "This is my timey-wimey detector. It goes ding when there's stuff."

  2. #2
    dan3ski's Avatar
    dan3ski is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    878

    Well, we split the season series

    The Vikings lost both games to the Pack this year. In fact Tice has lost 3 of 4 to the pack and two in the dome. In fact Tice has lost to the Pack three times in a row now!
    can we clone Bud Grant?

  3. #3
    BBQ Platypus's Avatar
    BBQ Platypus is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Saint Paul, MN
    Posts
    3,027

    Well, we split the season series

    The Pack may have "won" the first matchup this year, but that was because they got extremely lucky when the refs made that crappy call concerning that fumble.

    I think the main difference between the Vikings and Pacqueers is that the Vikings will often lose a game because they turn the ball over, whereas the Pacqueers will sometimes win a game because they turn the ball over.

    In other words, I was taking solace in the fact that we would have won the first game if the refs had actually done their job and made the right call.


    "This is my timey-wimey detector. It goes ding when there's stuff."

  4. #4
    dan3ski's Avatar
    dan3ski is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    878

    Well, we split the season series

    It is still a L in the win-loose column coulda , woulda, shouda but bottm line is the score at the end of the game.
    can we clone Bud Grant?

  5. #5
    cajunvike's Avatar
    cajunvike is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    32,063

    Well, we split the season series

    "BBQ Platypus" wrote:
    The Pack may have "won" the first matchup this year, but that was because they got extremely lucky when the refs made that crappy call concerning that fumble.

    I think the main difference between the Vikings and Pacqueers is that the Vikings will often lose a game because they turn the ball over, whereas the Pacqueers will sometimes win a game because they turn the ball over.

    In other words, I was taking solace in the fact that we would have won the first game if the refs had actually done their job and made the right call.
    Dude, the refs gave both games to the Pack...if they hadn't called for that measurement at the end of the first half...no time for the field goal...which just happened to be the final margin of victory...hmmmmmm!
    BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE

  6. #6
    ultravikingfan's Avatar
    ultravikingfan is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    24,514

    Well, we split the season series

    "BBQ Platypus" wrote:
    The Pack may have "won" the first matchup this year, but that was because they got extremely lucky when the refs made that crappy call concerning that fumble.

    I think the main difference between the Vikings and Pacqueers is that the Vikings will often lose a game because they turn the ball over, whereas the Pacqueers will sometimes win a game because they turn the ball over.

    In other words, I was taking solace in the fact that we would have won the first game if the refs had actually done their job and made the right call.
    :roll:

  7. #7
    fan4favre is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    256

    Well, we split the season series

    "cajunvike" wrote:
    "BBQ Platypus" wrote:
    The Pack may have "won" the first matchup this year, but that was because they got extremely lucky when the refs made that crappy call concerning that fumble.

    I think the main difference between the Vikings and Pacqueers is that the Vikings will often lose a game because they turn the ball over, whereas the Pacqueers will sometimes win a game because they turn the ball over.

    In other words, I was taking solace in the fact that we would have won the first game if the refs had actually done their job and made the right call.
    Dude, the refs gave both games to the Pack...if they hadn't called for that measurement at the end of the first half...no time for the field goal...which just happened to be the final margin of victory...hmmmmmm!

    ????

    Nice try cajun...a measurement call will NEVER affect the outcome the result of a game if it comes before the first half. :clown:

  8. #8
    Mossville is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    211

    Well, we split the season series

    "cajunvike" wrote:
    "BBQ Platypus" wrote:
    The Pack may have "won" the first matchup this year, but that was because they got extremely lucky when the refs made that crappy call concerning that fumble.

    I think the main difference between the Vikings and Pacqueers is that the Vikings will often lose a game because they turn the ball over, whereas the Pacqueers will sometimes win a game because they turn the ball over.

    In other words, I was taking solace in the fact that we would have won the first game if the refs had actually done their job and made the right call.
    Dude, the refs gave both games to the Pack...if they hadn't called for that measurement at the end of the first half...no time for the field goal...which just happened to be the final margin of victory...hmmmmmm!
    ok Einstein, do you seriously think that GB wouldnt have scored a TD on that last drive if need be? The only reason they kicked a FG is to let the game get over, otherwise they would have scored a TD with ease like they did all game, with respect to Claiborne's nice INT TD

  9. #9
    packmanxxxi is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    660

    Well, we split the season series

    The measurement call was the RIGHT call.. sorry guys... you know it, live with it...
    3 Straight Division Champs

  10. #10
    briboy75's Avatar
    briboy75 is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    555

    Well, we split the season series

    "cajunvike" wrote:
    "BBQ Platypus" wrote:
    The Pack may have "won" the first matchup this year, but that was because they got extremely lucky when the refs made that crappy call concerning that fumble.

    I think the main difference between the Vikings and Pacqueers is that the Vikings will often lose a game because they turn the ball over, whereas the Pacqueers will sometimes win a game because they turn the ball over.

    In other words, I was taking solace in the fact that we would have won the first game if the refs had actually done their job and made the right call.
    Dude, the refs gave both games to the Pack...if they hadn't called for that measurement at the end of the first half...no time for the field goal...which just happened to be the final margin of victory...hmmmmmm!

    a decent team would have overcome any ref decision...good teams don't put the game in the refs hands.. pack won both...go vikes 2005..this season is done!

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Split back sets
    By Purple Floyd in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-13-2008, 05:33 PM
  2. Looking for someone to split season tix w/ me
    By vikeswin2005 in forum Tix & Such
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-15-2008, 01:50 PM
  3. Looking to split season tickets with someone
    By mgore714 in forum Tix & Such
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-17-2008, 01:44 PM
  4. From the huddle's a new split?
    By digital420 in forum Help / Suggestion Box
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-20-2007, 08:10 PM
  5. ESPN split over the Vikes/Pats
    By Braddock in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 10-30-2006, 02:14 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •