We should trade for Deangelo Hall

**kevoncox** · 10-01-2007, 04:55 PM

Such a combo of Winfield and hall would be awesome and sure to sure up our pass defense.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slug=jc-halltraderequest093007&prov=yhoo&type=lgns

What would you give up for him...

I would go as high as a 3rd and griffen for him.

**marstc09** · 10-01-2007, 05:01 PM

We should get him now and solve our problem opposite Winfield. Griffin and McCauley are not ready. Missed tackles and poor coverage. Hall would be a huge upgrade and solve our pass defense woes. I am all for giving them a 3 maybe a 2 pick.

**Purplemania** · 10-01-2007, 05:02 PM

I've always thought DeAngelo was a cocky idiot, but he is talented. I'd give up a 2nd rounder for him. Winfield + DeAngelo = TRY THROWING THE BALL 40+ PLAY ON US NOW MOTHER F*CKERS!

**cajunvike** · 10-01-2007, 05:05 PM

NOT if he is gonna side with Vick...c'mon...lose the colorblind glasses first!

BUT he WOULD solve two problems for us...the need for a solid #2 CB AND our kick return situation...freeing up AP for full-time RB duty and not risking getting him hurt on special teams.

**kevoncox** · 10-01-2007, 05:06 PM

he problem is we never pull the trigger on deals that make sense....
After all we gave up 3 ist round picks for....
Never mind.
>

**kevoncox** · 10-01-2007, 05:09 PM

"cajunvike" wrote:

NOT if he is gonna side with Vick...c'mon...lose the colorblind glasses first!

BUT he WOULD solve two problems for us...the need for a solid #2 CB AND our kick return situation...freeing up AP for full-time RB duty and not risking getting him hurt on special teams.

I think he sides with Vick because of how Vick took him under his wing. As much as we hate to admit it, these guys are humans. There has to be atleast one person in your life that has done something wrong but has always treated you right!
These guys are more than teammates. I played football and I know all of my teammates are like brothers to me. These guys played together in college and pros...that Builds unity.

**Purplemania** · 10-01-2007, 05:14 PM

True Kevoncox. And I don't think he's saying Michael Vick is right, just that how the organization is handling the situation is wrong.

**ThorSPL** · 10-01-2007, 05:17 PM

"kevoncox" wrote:

he problem is we never pull the trigger on deals that make sense....
After all we gave up 3 ist round picks for....
Never mind.
>

That post should land you in hell for a day or two....

**cajunvike** · 10-01-2007, 05:19 PM

"kevoncox" wrote:

"cajunvike" wrote:

NOT if he is gonna side with Vick...c'mon...lose the colorblind glasses first!

BUT he WOULD solve two problems for us...the need for a solid #2 CB AND our kick return situation...freeing up AP for full-time RB duty and not risking getting him hurt on special teams.

I think he sides with Vick because of how Vick took him under his wing. As much as we hate to admit it, these guys are humans. There has to be atleast one person in your life that has done something wrong but has always treated you right!
These guys are more than teammates. I played football and I know all of my teammates are like brothers to me. These guys played together in college and pros...that Builds unity.

He should be mad at Vick for putting himself in the position that he did.
It was irresponsible and ended up hurting his teammates.
Don't get mad at the messenger!