-
05-22-2008, 12:39 PM #11
Re: Wade won't concede his starting job
"StillPurple" wrote:
That's because they aren't. The players know that, the team knows that, hell everyone except a select few posters on here know that...To me "slot receiver" and "starting receiver" are not the same things.
:
-
05-22-2008, 01:59 PM #12
Ring of Fame
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 3,836
Re: Wade won't concede his starting job
Bobby will be lucky if he ends up being the slot guy!!... I think Ferg may end up taking that position over.. he's bigger, stronger, faster, and better... not to mention the best blocker on the team!!!

-
05-22-2008, 02:01 PM #13
Team Alumni
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 3,051
Re: Wade won't concede his starting job
"bleedpurple" wrote:
ill say AA has a better chance at slot than Ferg. Ferg is definetly the 5th WR, and will most likely only come in on running downsBobby will be lucky if he ends up being the slot guy!!... I think Ferg may end up taking that position over.. he's bigger, stronger, faster, and better... not to mention the best blocker on the team!!!
Pissing on the Pack since 08'
-
05-22-2008, 02:02 PM #14
Ring of Fame
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 3,836
Re: Wade won't concede his starting job
"dcboardr41" wrote:
I won't be mad if that happens.. but i will not concede Ferg isnt' better than wade!!..."bleedpurple" wrote:
ill say AA has a better chance at slot than Ferg. Ferg is definetly the 5th WR, and will most likely only come in on running downsBobby will be lucky if he ends up being the slot guy!!... I think Ferg may end up taking that position over.. he's bigger, stronger, faster, and better... not to mention the best blocker on the team!!!
-
05-22-2008, 02:19 PM #15
Re: Wade won't concede his starting job
They all will get paid the same if they start or not.
And I personally don't care who starts, as long as they get open and catch the ball, when they are on the field.
And scoring a few TD's too would be nice.
;D
[size=12pt]
Page 148.5 **Doleman 150.5 **Randle 137.5 **Allen 73+[/size]
-
05-22-2008, 03:46 PM #16
Ring of Fame
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 3,836
Re: Wade won't concede his starting job
"gagarr" wrote:
and that's exactly why we don't need wade on the field!!!They all will get paid the same if they start or not.
And I personally don't care who starts, as long as they get open and catch the ball, when they are on the field.
And scoring a few TD's too would be nice.
;D
;D
-
05-22-2008, 04:16 PM #17
Re: Wade won't concede his starting job
"bleedpurple" wrote:
Except when we are at the 45 yard line, and need 3 yards with a stacked box....... ;D"gagarr" wrote:
and that's exactly why we don't need wade on the field!!!They all will get paid the same if they start or not.
And I personally don't care who starts, as long as they get open and catch the ball, when they are on the field.
And scoring a few TD's too would be nice.
;D
;D
S
S
LB
MLB
LB
CB
RDE
DT
DT
LDE
LB
CB
BB
B-Wade
LT
LG
C
RG
RT
Rice
TJ
TE
RB
Do they cover B wade with just a LB or help with a S.
If its the S then BB is open.
Whether you want to admit it or not, B-wade is faster than Fergy and should burn the shit out of a LB on the short slant.Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.
-
05-22-2008, 04:23 PM #18
Team Alumni
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 3,051
Re: Wade won't concede his starting job
"Marrdro" wrote:
exactly Marr, i read an interview on Vikes.com with bevell and he said"bleedpurple" wrote:
Except when we are at the 45 yard line, and need 3 yards with a stacked box....... ;D"gagarr" wrote:
and that's exactly why we don't need wade on the field!!!They all will get paid the same if they start or not.
And I personally don't care who starts, as long as they get open and catch the ball, when they are on the field.
And scoring a few TD's too would be nice.
;D
;D
S
S
LB
MLB
LB
CB
RDE
DT
DT
LDE
LB
CB
BB
B-Wade
LT
LG
C
RG
RT
Rice
TJ
TE
RB
Do they cover B wade with just a LB or help with a S.
If its the S then BB is open.
Whether you want to admit it or not, B-wade is faster than Fergy and should burn the pooh out of a LB on the short slant.
3 wr sets will be their main formation. throwing Wade or AA in the slot is a great idea, Have Shank chip for the LT or the RT to help them out, then out for a route. Sounds like a great formation for us
Pissing on the Pack since 08'
-
05-22-2008, 04:25 PM #19
Re: Wade won't concede his starting job
"dcboardr41" wrote:
I also heard that they are planning on having a lot more Two-back sets (Peterson and Taylor) plays. It's all smoke and mirrors until the season starts."Marrdro" wrote:
exactly Marr, i read an interview on Vikes.com with bevell and he said"bleedpurple" wrote:
Except when we are at the 45 yard line, and need 3 yards with a stacked box....... ;D"gagarr" wrote:
and that's exactly why we don't need wade on the field!!!They all will get paid the same if they start or not.
And I personally don't care who starts, as long as they get open and catch the ball, when they are on the field.
And scoring a few TD's too would be nice.
;D
;D
S
S
LB
MLB
LB
CB
RDE
DT
DT
LDE
LB
CB
BB
B-Wade
LT
LG
C
RG
RT
Rice
TJ
TE
RB
Do they cover B wade with just a LB or help with a S.
If its the S then BB is open.
Whether you want to admit it or not, B-wade is faster than Fergy and should burn the pooh out of a LB on the short slant.
3 wr sets will be their main formation. throwing Wade or AA in the slot is a great idea, Have Shank chip for the LT or the RT to help them out, then out for a route. Sounds like a great formation for usDisclaimer: I'm an idiot.
-
05-22-2008, 04:26 PM #20
Team Alumni
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 3,051
Re: Wade won't concede his starting job
"C" wrote:
and thats "supposivly" the reason why T-Rich bounced, less plays for the FB, but i like it"dcboardr41" wrote:
I also heard that they are planning on having a lot more Two-back sets (Peterson and Taylor) plays. It's all smoke and mirrors until the season starts."Marrdro" wrote:
exactly Marr, i read an interview on Vikes.com with bevell and he said"bleedpurple" wrote:
Except when we are at the 45 yard line, and need 3 yards with a stacked box....... ;D"gagarr" wrote:
and that's exactly why we don't need wade on the field!!!They all will get paid the same if they start or not.
And I personally don't care who starts, as long as they get open and catch the ball, when they are on the field.
And scoring a few TD's too would be nice.
;D
;D
S
S
LB
MLB
LB
CB
RDE
DT
DT
LDE
LB
CB
BB
B-Wade
LT
LG
C
RG
RT
Rice
TJ
TE
RB
Do they cover B wade with just a LB or help with a S.
If its the S then BB is open.
Whether you want to admit it or not, B-wade is faster than Fergy and should burn the pooh out of a LB on the short slant.
3 wr sets will be their main formation. throwing Wade or AA in the slot is a great idea, Have Shank chip for the LT or the RT to help them out, then out for a route. Sounds like a great formation for us
Pissing on the Pack since 08'
Similar Threads
-
Bobby Wade Cut
By NodakPaul in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 245Last Post: 09-14-2009, 07:11 PM -
why was wade retuning punts
By peterson-rox28 in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 72Last Post: 12-24-2008, 09:54 AM -
Sharper not ready to concede entering final year of contract
By marstc09 in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 4Last Post: 06-09-2008, 08:39 AM -
Congrats BLV on the Wade G
By vikinggreg in forum The ClubhouseReplies: 7Last Post: 03-03-2008, 07:34 AM -
Wade reception
By ColoradoViking in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 0Last Post: 09-10-2007, 01:22 AM



Reply With Quote



Bookmarks