Page 11 of 16 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 110 of 152
  1. #101
    ejmat is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    8,849

    Re: Vincent Jackson talk

    Zeus wrote:
    Infidel wrote:
    If we made good picks.....our rookies would make the team.
    Dear God, this is idiotic.

    2006 draft:
    2006 1 17 Chad Greenway LB
    2006 2 48 Cedric Griffin DB
    2006 2 51 Ryan Cook C
    2006 2 64 Tarvaris Jackson QB
    2006 4 127 Ray Edwards DE
    2006 5 149 Greg Blue DB
    2006 6 185 Tyrone Culver DB

    7 picks, 6 made the 2006 team, 5 still on the team in 2010.

    2007 draft:
    2007 1 7 Adrian Peterson RB
    2007 2 44 Sidney Rice WR
    2007 3 72 Marcus McCauley DB
    2007 4 102 Brian Robison DE
    2007 5 146 Aundrae Allison WR
    2007 6 176 Rufus Alexander LB
    2007 7 217 Tyler Thigpen QB
    2007 7 233 Chandler Williams WR

    8 picks, 6 made the team in 2007, 3 still on the team in 2010.

    2008 draft:
    2008 2 43 Tyrell Johnson DB
    2008 5 137 John David Booty QB
    2008 5 152 Letroy Guion DT
    2008 6 187 John Sullivan C
    2008 6 193 Jaymar Johnson WR

    5 picks, 5 made the team in 2008, 4 still on the team in 2010.

    2009 draft:
    2009 1 22 Percy Harvin WR
    2009 2 54 Phil Loadholt T
    2009 3 86 Asher Allen DB
    2009 5 150 Jasper Brinkley LB
    2009 7 231 Jamarca Sanford DB

    5 picks, 5 made the team in 2009, 5 still on the team in 2010.

    2010 draft:
    2010 2 34 Chris Cook DB
    2010 2 51 Toby Gerhart RB
    2010 4 100 Everson Griffen DE
    2010 5 161 Chris DeGeare G
    2010 5 167 Nathan Triplett LB
    2010 6 199 Joe Webb WR
    2010 7 214 Mickey Shuler TE
    2010 7 237 Ryan D'Imperio RB

    8 picks, 6 made the team in 2010, coming out of training camp.

    Care to revise your ill-informed comment?

    =Z=
    Thanks Z. Just saved me a bunch of time.

  2. #102
    Infidel is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,947

    Re: Vincent Jackson talk

    Nice information, Zeus.....but you need to figure out who you're arguing with.....I think it's probably Marrdro, who said:

    Truth of the matter is, this team is deep at almost all positions. We can afford to give up two high draft picks this year if they decide to do it. Rationale is that if we used all of our picks to pick rooks, not all of them will make the team anyways.
    It's what you learn after you know it all that counts.
    --John Wooden

  3. #103
    ejmat is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    8,849

    Re: Vincent Jackson talk

    Infidel wrote:
    Nice information, Zeus.....but you need to figure out who you're arguing with.....I think it's probably Marrdro, who said:

    Truth of the matter is, this team is deep at almost all positions. We can afford to give up two high draft picks this year if they decide to do it. Rationale is that if we used all of our picks to pick rooks, not all of them will make the team anyways.
    No! Zeus hit the nail on the head. It was you that stated:

    Infidel wrote:
    If we made good picks.....our rookies would make the team.

    Zeus very nicely explained that our draft picks have been pretty good since the Childress era began. If you are expecting every single draft pick to make the roster I think your expectations are unreasonable.

  4. #104
    Infidel is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,947

    Re: Vincent Jackson talk

    So what's your beef with what I said? It was accurate.

    Do you think I should say instead.....if we made good picks.....our rookies WOULDN'T make the team?

    Maybe you'd agree with that?

    LOL!
    It's what you learn after you know it all that counts.
    --John Wooden

  5. #105
    ejmat is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    8,849

    Re: Vincent Jackson talk

    Infidel wrote:
    So what's your beef with what I said? It was accurate.

    Do you think I should say instead.....if we made good picks.....our rookies WOULDN'T make the team?

    Maybe you'd agree with that?

    LOL!
    The more you type the more clueless you are becoming.

    Your post was clearly to debate that the Vikings make bad draft picks. Clearly! Zeus called you out appropriately.

    You're trying to twist the post into something it wasn't meant to be. My advise is don't try that around these here parts. You WILL be called out for it. Take it how you want.

  6. #106
    tastywaves's Avatar
    tastywaves is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,869

    Re: Vincent Jackson talk

    Infidel wrote:
    So what's your beef with what I said? It was accurate.

    Do you think I should say instead.....if we made good picks.....our rookies WOULDN'T make the team?

    Maybe you'd agree with that?

    LOL!
    Kind of like: If you say something meaningful...people MIGHT take you seriously.

  7. #107
    Infidel is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,947

    Re: Vincent Jackson talk

    Your post was clearly to debate that the Vikings make bad draft picks. Clearly! Zeus called you out appropriately.

    You're trying to twist the post into something it wasn't meant to be.
    No, I didn't say anything about the Vikings making bad draft picks, so you're the one that's looking clueless, not me.

    You're clearly twisting what I said into something you dreamed up.

    Don't try that around here. You'll get called on it.
    It's what you learn after you know it all that counts.
    --John Wooden

  8. #108
    V4L's Avatar
    V4L
    V4L is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    20,612

    Re: Vincent Jackson talk

    Infidel wrote:
    Your post was clearly to debate that the Vikings make bad draft picks. Clearly! Zeus called you out appropriately.

    You're trying to twist the post into something it wasn't meant to be.
    No, I didn't say anything about the Vikings making bad draft picks, so you're the one that's looking clueless, not me.

    You're clearly twisting what I said into something you dreamed up.

    Don't try that around here. You'll get called on it.


    I beg to differ you got quoted on it

    Also, on page said you said: "Well we should do better"

    Clearly you don't think we draft well

  9. #109
    Infidel is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,947

    Re: Vincent Jackson talk

    Clearly, I didn't say we don't draft well.

    I said we could do better.

    Clearly.
    It's what you learn after you know it all that counts.
    --John Wooden

  10. #110
    V4L's Avatar
    V4L
    V4L is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    20,612

    Re: Vincent Jackson talk

    Infidel wrote:
    Clearly, I didn't say we don't draft well.

    I said we could do better.

    Clearly.

    Ok, come up with some picks you would have done instead of the ones we did

    You obviously have a problem with the way we draft if you felt the need to bring it up

    So come up with some examples for us please on what you would have done in the draft instead of what we did

Page 11 of 16 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Talk to ya all in May.
    By Jereamiah in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 12-31-2008, 09:20 PM
  2. Ok, let's talk serious now.
    By baumy300 in forum Two Beer Minimum
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 05-13-2008, 04:02 AM
  3. Redskins release safety Troy Vincent
    By singersp in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-22-2007, 09:09 PM
  4. Should we have gone for Vincent?
    By Sprewell27 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-16-2004, 07:12 PM
  5. getting vincent ??
    By acsfreak84 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 03-01-2004, 12:25 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •