Both of these teams have a reason to go all out. The Vikes have slightly better physical team but it will undoubtedly boil down to coaching, coaching, coaching. Holmgren vs. Tice...hmmm...pretty easy pickin.
Printable View
Both of these teams have a reason to go all out. The Vikes have slightly better physical team but it will undoubtedly boil down to coaching, coaching, coaching. Holmgren vs. Tice...hmmm...pretty easy pickin.
I seriously would like to see a tie.
no it will boil down to the fact that both teams have horrible defenses, Hasselbeck sucks, and their receivers cant catch. We have a much better offense...i dont see them winning unless Alexander can get like 150 yards and a few TDs to help them control the clock and TOP all game. I say Vikes win at the dome by a score of 31-17
"ADubya26" wrote:
When the Seahawks won two years ago thats exactly what happened...Alexander controlled the first half and pounded the Vikes D all day long. Last year when we got blown out in the Dome, Alexander was a nonfactor because the Hawks were playing from behind and we didn't have the passing attack to match the Vikes.Quote:
no it will boil down to the fact that both teams have horrible defenses, Hasselbeck sucks, and their receivers cant catch. We have a much better offense...i dont see them winning unless Alexander can get like 150 yards and a few TDs to help them control the clock and TOP all game. I say Vikes win at the dome by a score of 31-17
For as much as the Hawks passing game is hyped, that was never the strength of our offense and other teams are discovering what Hawks fans have known all along which is that Shaun Alexander is the key to our offense much like Randy Moss for the Vikes and Ahman Green for the Packers.
Yeah i remember that one..what did he have like 5 TDs in the first half or something like that? He definitely is your key, no doubt about it, but you guys lost to the Rams 2 times even with him running for more than 150 and some TDs. I think it boils down to the fact that Hasselbeck is not the same QB as last year and you cant be one dimensional and expect to win.
"jeebs" wrote:
What is this, the generic version of....Quote:
Both of these teams have a reason to go all out. The Vikes have slightly better physical team but it will undoubtedly boil down to coaching, coaching, coaching. Holmgren vs. Tice...hmmm...pretty easy pickin.
Ask Jeeves.....
I am looking for Culpepper to have a 5 TD day.
Check out the concerns below:
Darrell Jackson, WR SEA
News: The Seattle Times reports Darrell Jackson left the Seahawks for Florida to be with his father, who has been diagnosed with cancer and is in the hospital. May rejoin the team?
Jerry Rice, WR SEA
News: The Seattle Times reports Rice tested his injured quadriceps in just one play during practice on Friday. Expected to start.
Just remember that this year and last year is at OUR house and two years ago was at seattle. For one we play very well at home and seattle plays like crap on the road. IF this game were to be played at seattle it would be a different story since seattle is a decent home team despite blowing two games and the vikes are a horrible road team. I see us winning this one at home.
"hawaiianvike21" wrote:
:director: Thank you HV a Voice of reason :sunny:Quote:
Just remember that this year and last year is at OUR house and two years ago was at seattle. For one we play very well at home and seattle plays like crap on the road. IF this game were to be played at seattle it would be a different story since seattle is a decent home team despite blowing two games and the vikes are a horrible road team. I see us winning this one at home.
:rr: