-
11-21-2010, 03:08 PM #11
Re: VIKINGS vs PUKERS OFFICIAL POSTGAME DISCUSSION
12purplepride28 wrote:
Lame attempt at a joke.KrackerJack wrote:
No way in hell do I want Cam Newton. Much rather have mallet or luckDamn.
Well... The only thing that I saw that made me smile was the crowd chanting "Fire Childress", thank you to those of you at the dome.
Cam Newton, anyone?
-
11-21-2010, 03:09 PM #12
Pro-Bowler
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Posts
- 441
Re: VIKINGS vs PUKERS OFFICIAL POSTGAME DISCUSSION
We dominated the entire 1st quarter on both sides of the ball, had chances to score more, but pissed it all away as usual. Everytime we get a good drive going, some idiot holds, or another idiot turns the ball over. Abdullah drops an easy INT, and I just knew the next play would be a TD.
The Packers had like 15 total yards, or some dismal total like that in the 1st quarter, then we stopped blitzing for 2 quarters, let Rodgers pick us apart, and found ourselves down 24-3 in no time. Frazier is a fraud, and his ass has to go when Chiller is fired. The only adjustments we ever make is to go away from what's working.
Bring on the next no name, low budget coach, and project QB. I'm ready to piss away another 5 years already.
-
Re: VIKINGS vs PUKERS OFFICIAL POSTGAME DISCUSSION
KrackerJack wrote:
What? I don't know if you are saying mallet and luck are jokes or if you think i was making a pun or something. but no. i'm serious. jesus12purplepride28 wrote:
Lame attempt at a joke.KrackerJack wrote:
No way in hell do I want Cam Newton. Much rather have mallet or luckDamn.
Well... The only thing that I saw that made me smile was the crowd chanting "Fire Childress", thank you to those of you at the dome.
Cam Newton, anyone?I am NOT here to provide good football insight or rational observations. I am an emotional 19 year old Viking fan and I expect you to adjust your expectations from my posts.
-
Re: VIKINGS vs PUKERS OFFICIAL POSTGAME DISCUSSION
It's been said if a sportsman is unsure whether to retire or not, it's better to play one season too many rather than quit and be forever wondering. Favre's played one season too many.
-
11-21-2010, 03:17 PM #15
Star Spokesman
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Posts
- 1,947
Re: VIKINGS vs PUKERS OFFICIAL POSTGAME DISCUSSION
Hey, if Favre, Harvin, Peterson and Camarillo had been given a little help this year.....we'd be talking Superbowl.
The O-Line failed and we lacked a deep threat receiver. The Defense played erratically except for a couple of people.
When we did get a deep threat reciever.....Chilly canned him.
That's the story of our season.It's what you learn after you know it all that counts.
--John Wooden
-
Re: VIKINGS vs PUKERS OFFICIAL POSTGAME DISCUSSION
Infidel wrote:
Stop acting like Favre has played good. you just look like an idiotHey, if Favre, Harvin, Peterson and Camarillo had been given a little help this year.....we'd be talking Superbowl.
The O-Line failed and we lacked a deep threat receiver. The Defense played erratically.
When we did get a deep threat reciever.....Chilly canned him.
That's the story of our season.I am NOT here to provide good football insight or rational observations. I am an emotional 19 year old Viking fan and I expect you to adjust your expectations from my posts.
-
Re: VIKINGS vs PUKERS OFFICIAL POSTGAME DISCUSSION
SharperImage wrote:
That is one reason I want a head coach with a resume. These players will not want to hang around for another inept staff.I JUST DONT GET IT. Its the same Fucking team as last year. Its like Favre and the O-Line just took a shit this season.
Fire Childress. Fuck the West Coast offense. Bring in the Run N Gun. It fits the team better. We have "Push it down the field" speed and talent. Not Nickle n Dime talent like Pats/Colts/jets/ on offense.
I pray that rice greenway and leber will resign. I hope we get a decent Oline.
-
11-21-2010, 03:21 PM #18
Re: VIKINGS vs PUKERS OFFICIAL POSTGAME DISCUSSION
Infidel wrote:
:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:Hey, if Favre, Harvin, Peterson and Camarillo had been given a little help this year.....we'd be talking Superbowl.
The O-Line failed and we lacked a deep threat receiver. The Defense played erratically except for a couple of people.
When we did get a deep threat reciever.....Chilly canned him.
That's the story of our season.
Thanks for cheering me up.
-
11-21-2010, 03:28 PM #19
Star Spokesman
- Join Date
- Sep 2010
- Posts
- 1,947
Re: VIKINGS vs PUKERS OFFICIAL POSTGAME DISCUSSION
kevoncox wrote:
You're welcome.....a little realism was needed amidst all the wailing and gnashing of teeth.Infidel wrote:
:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:Hey, if Favre, Harvin, Peterson and Camarillo had been given a little help this year.....we'd be talking Superbowl.
The O-Line failed and we lacked a deep threat receiver. The Defense played erratically except for a couple of people.
When we did get a deep threat reciever.....Chilly canned him.
That's the story of our season.
Thanks for cheering me up.
It's what you learn after you know it all that counts.
--John Wooden
-
11-21-2010, 03:29 PM #20
Re: VIKINGS vs PUKERS OFFICIAL POSTGAME DISCUSSION
Sorry, guys.
That felt so good. You know the feeling. I have rust spots on my NFC North division champion hat, and that is sad also.
I want a new white one, and this time I'm buying right away.
:P
Similar Threads
-
Official Vikes vs Lions Postgame Discussion
By ultravikingfan in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 102Last Post: 01-19-2011, 03:48 PM -
VIKINGS vs EAGLES OFFICIAL POSTGAME DISCUSSION
By ultravikingfan in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 133Last Post: 01-02-2011, 01:04 AM -
OFFICIAL VIKES vs PATS POSTGAME DISCUSSION
By ultravikingfan in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 100Last Post: 11-04-2010, 10:49 AM -
VIKINGS vs PACKERS OFFICIAL POSTGAME DISCUSSION
By ultravikingfan in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 513Last Post: 10-30-2010, 05:14 PM -
Vikings vs Saints Official Postgame Discussion
By ultravikingfan in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 159Last Post: 09-18-2010, 09:01 AM



Reply With Quote




Bookmarks