Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,266

    Vikings' Udeze is only a little sad over lack of sacks

    [size=13pt]Vikings' Udeze is only a little sad over lack of sacks[/size]

    The Vikings defensive end says he wouldn't care a bit about stats if the team would start winning.

    Judd Zulgad, Star Tribune
    Last update: November 21, 2006 – 11:39 PM


    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  2. #2
    PurplePackerEater is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,738

    Re: Vikings' Udeze is only a little sad over lack of sacks

    -"The Vikings defensive end says he wouldn't care a bit about stats if the team would start winning."-


    Aren't these guys advised to say things like this to keep up public relations?

    Or is it to cover a lack luster performance?

  3. #3
    PurplePackerEater is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,738

    Re: Vikings' Udeze is only a little sad over lack of sacks

    It just says, to me, that he only cares about stats if they're "good".

  4. #4
    vikes2456's Avatar
    vikes2456 is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,656

    Re: Vikings' Udeze is only a little sad over lack of sacks

    "PurplePackerEater" wrote:
    It just says, to me, that he only cares about stats if they're "good".
    Sort of a negative way of looking at it. I'm sure if he would rather have a decent performance and win every game, than get two sacks a game and lose. Remember, there is no greater feeling than winning the game

  5. #5
    ItalianStallion's Avatar
    ItalianStallion is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,615

    Re: Vikings' Udeze is only a little sad over lack of sacks

    "vikes2456" wrote:
    "PurplePackerEater" wrote:
    It just says, to me, that he only cares about stats if they're "good".
    Sort of a negative way of looking at it. I'm sure if he would rather have a decent performance and win every game, than get two sacks a game and lose. Remember, there is no greater feeling than winning the game
    What about signing a fat contract extension?


    I m like a Ja Rule poster, cause I'm off the wall.

  6. #6
    enlvikeman's Avatar
    enlvikeman is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,395

    Re: Vikings' Udeze is only a little sad over lack of sacks

    There is a reason why we are number 1 against the run and he is a big part of the reason.
    Just a one dimensional DE.



    "24 mil under the cap? there are teams 30 mil over the cap, heck that gives us at least 50 mil to spend"

    CollegeGuyJeff circa 2006

  7. #7
    cogitans is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    6,403

    Re: Vikings' Udeze is only a little sad over lack of sacks

    "enlvikeman" wrote:
    There is a reason why we are number 1 against the run and he is a big part of the reason.
    Just a one dimensional DE.
    As the article says. He's right up there with the QB hurries, and he has had the sacks in the past.

    I wouldn't call him one dimensional. He'll get back at getting the QB down again.

    Thanks to PPE for the sig.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,160

    Re: Vikings' Udeze is only a little sad over lack of sacks

    I don't care as much about sacks as I do about STOPPING THE PASS! We give up -3 rushing yards and still give up 24 (however many it was) points. That sounds like a crapload of passing yards and passing TDs (also defensive tds). although... sacks do help stop the pass. now that I think about it, I checked out the stats, and I'm pretty sure K-Will's the only guy wtih more than 2 (I think he has 5). possibly connected to the lacking of good passing defense.
    WE CAN BUILD ON THIS!!!

    In AP I trust

  9. #9
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,266

    Re: Vikings' Udeze is only a little sad over lack of sacks

    "farvathevikinglover" wrote:
    I don't care as much about sacks as I do about STOPPING THE PASS! We give up -3 rushing yards and still give up 24 (however many it was) points. That sounds like a crapload of passing yards and passing TDs (also defensive tds). although... sacks do help stop the pass. now that I think about it, I checked out the stats, and I'm pretty sure K-Will's the only guy wtih more than 2 (I think he has 5). possibly connected to the lacking of good passing defense.
    We didn't give up -3 yards rushing, we gave up +4.

    http://www.startribune.com/510/story/825427.html

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,160

    Re: Vikings' Udeze is only a little sad over lack of sacks

    My bad. Still, that's only a seven yard difference.
    WE CAN BUILD ON THIS!!!

    In AP I trust

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. The vikings and lack of developing a qb
    By kyleburkle in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 12-17-2010, 02:29 AM
  2. Vikings from four creates sacks, hurries and havoc
    By NodakPaul in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-23-2008, 09:02 AM
  3. No sacks? No worry, Vikings are saying
    By COJOMAY in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-01-2007, 03:11 PM
  4. Vikings' defensive line rarely experiences the joy of sacks
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-02-2007, 09:18 AM
  5. Vikings Sacks!
    By Webby in forum Gameday Previews
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-22-2004, 11:50 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •