Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    COJOMAY is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    7,005

    Vikings' run dominance might not be enough

    http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3156247&lpos=spotlight&lid=tab2pos1

    Conventional wisdom says that to win in the playoffs, you have to be able to run the ball and stop the run.

    If that conventional wisdom is true, the most dangerous team in the NFC might be the Minnesota Vikings. No team since the AFL-NFL merger in 1970 has been quite as unbalanced, with both the offense and defense dramatically better on running plays than on passing plays.

    The Vikings lead the league in rushing average, getting 5.7 yards per carry. That's 0.8 better than the team in second place through Week 14, Denver (4.9 yards per carry). Only once since 1970 has there been a larger difference between the top two teams in rushing average: 1991, when the Barry Sanders-led Lions averaged 5.5 yards per carry and the Broncos were second with 4.6 yards per carry.

    The only reason the Vikings are not as dominant on run defense is that there is one other team that is their equal. Baltimore is allowing only 2.9 yards per carry to lead the league, and Minnesota is second with 3.1 yards per carry. Every other defense allows 3.7 yards per carry or more.

    In the passing game, however, the Vikings are merely average. They barely gain more yardage on passes than on runs. Their average of 5.8 net yards per pass is 20th in the league. On defense, they allow 6.1 net yards per pass, which ranks 15th.

    If the run is the key to winning in the playoffs, teams that are similar to Minnesota should have a strong record in the postseason. But when we look at NFL history, we find just the opposite: Most similar teams have losing records, and the teams with winning records generally flop in the postseason...
    Kentucky Vikes Fan

    When you require nothing, you get nothing; when you expect nothing, you will find nothing; when you embrace nothing, all you will have is nothing.

  2. #2
    Ltrey33 is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    8,618

    Re: Vikings' run dominance might not be enough

    I think that passing stat is probably a bit stilted. I would like to see the average of those numbers over the past 6 games or so.

    The Holcomb/Bollinger experience and Tarvaris's early struggles probably weigh that statistic down quite a bit.

  3. #3
    V4L's Avatar
    V4L
    V4L is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    20,612

    Re: Vikings' run dominance might not be enough

    "Ltrey" wrote:
    I think that passing stat is probably a bit stilted. I would like to see the average of those numbers over the past 6 games or so.

    The Holcomb/Bollinger experience and Tarvaris's early struggles probably weigh that statistic down quite a bit.
    Exactly

    We have played some bad teams.. But it does seem we are a different team


  4. #4
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,266

    Re: Vikings' run dominance might not be enough

    We just need to keep doing what we've been doing the past 4 games & not worry about stats.

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  5. #5
    cogitans is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    6,403

    Re: Vikings' run dominance might not be enough


    Thanks to PPE for the sig.

Similar Threads

  1. Vikings' run dominance might not be enough
    By cogitans in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 12-17-2007, 04:38 AM
  2. Dominance over Lions
    By Bdubya in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-12-2006, 08:33 PM
  3. "It isn't easy replacing dominance"
    By PurplePackerEater in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 70
    Last Post: 09-18-2005, 06:27 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •