Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19
  1. #11
    PacNWVike's Avatar
    PacNWVike is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    West Richland, WA
    Posts
    2,270
    I agree with Caine... Our only weapons are Peterson, Harvin, and Rudolph... Two out of three are left. The receiving corpse is a joke...
    "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing."
    Edmund Burke

  2. #12
    Reignman is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    630
    Quote Originally Posted by Caine View Post
    We should quit pretending, line up 10 Offensive Linemen, and direct snap to Peterson every down. After all, everyone knows we're not really going to throw...not very often anyway...and certainly not very deep.

    Feed the Beast.

    Caine
    I like it, except there's only 1 problem with that plan, we can't even find 5 guys to block on a consistent basis so where are we going to get 10?

    Quote Originally Posted by singersp View Post
    Hopefully Spielman doesn't have 100% confidence in Simpson & still believes in him like he does in Ponder & Carlson.

    Jerome Simpson, 5 years, 25 starts, 86 Rec, 1,180 Yds, 13.7 Avg, 7 TD, 1 Somersault
    Troy Williamson, 5 years, 24 starts, 87 Rec, 1,131 Yds, 13.0 Avg, 4 TD, 0 Somersaults

    Coincidence?
    Yikes! Scary stuff. I bet the drops are similar too, so I guess it all comes down to somersaults, and Simpson is clearly better. Don't forget he has pretty good hurdling abilities too.

  3. #13
    bleedpurple is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,955
    Quote Originally Posted by PacNWVike View Post
    I agree with Caine... Our only weapons are Peterson, Harvin, and Rudolph... Two out of three are left. The receiving corpse is a joke...
    so is the QB

  4. #14
    TheAnimal93 is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,308
    The biggest problem we have with the WR's is the fact that we dont have #1 receiver. Simpson and Harvin are both # 2's. Wright and Childs, #2's. Aromas and Jenks are #3's. Tough duty, huh? Vikes need a top flight #1 WR.

  5. #15
    kevoncox's Avatar
    kevoncox is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    5,916
    Quote Originally Posted by TheAnimal93 View Post
    The biggest problem we have with the WR's is the fact that we dont have #1 receiver. Simpson and Harvin are both # 2's. Wright and Childs, #2's. Aromas and Jenks are #3's. Tough duty, huh? Vikes need a top flight #1 WR.
    Tell the cardinals how good that works?

  6. #16
    TheAnimal93 is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,308
    Quote Originally Posted by kevoncox View Post
    Tell the cardinals how good that works?
    Dammit Beavis. I didnt say that was the only thing we needed. I thought this was about WR's? Was my statement true or untrue? Was that the only piece of the puzzle that the Cards needed when they drafted Fitz? I assume that is who you talking about. We also could upgrade at other positions. Offense and defense.

  7. #17
    Reignman is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    630
    Quote Originally Posted by TheAnimal93 View Post
    Dammit Beavis.
    I just had to LOL ... that is all.

  8. #18
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,271
    Quote Originally Posted by TheAnimal93 View Post
    The biggest problem we have with the WR's is the fact that we dont have #1 receiver. Simpson and Harvin are both # 2's. Wright and Childs, #2's. Aromas and Jenks are #3's. Tough duty, huh? Vikes need a top flight #1 WR.
    If Ponder is throwing short of #2 & #3 receivers down field, what leads you to believe he won't throw short of a #1?

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  9. #19
    Purple Floyd's Avatar
    Purple Floyd is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    16,646
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by singersp View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TheAnimal93 View Post
    The biggest problem we have with the WR's is the fact that we dont have #1 receiver. Simpson and Harvin are both # 2's. Wright and Childs, #2's. Aromas and Jenks are #3's. Tough duty, huh? Vikes need a top flight #1 WR.
    If Ponder is throwing short of #2 & #3 receivers down field, what leads you to believe he won't throw short of a #1?
    not to mention wide open RBs who beat the defender down the left sideline

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •