-
11-17-2009, 11:52 AM #101
Re: Are the Vikings the NFL's best team?
"CulpepperViking16" wrote:
Good stuff my friend.The top 5 are Bengals, Vikings, Patriots, Saints, and Colts.
The bengals are heavily underrated in my opinion. They're 7-2, but should be 8-1. Since they're not, they've been able to stay out of the spotlight, but this team is dangerous. I still think the Vikings are #1, and most of that can be attributed to Favre (he makes receivers look better, dont' tell me TJ would be giving rice 200 yards a game)
The colts haven't lost a game, so I don't think they can look back and improve, which will hurt them later on....plus they're injury plagued as well.
Saints are a powerhouse waiting to fall into a slump. Defense isn't great and Sharper has won a couple of their games for them.
The Patriots are still a gol 'darnit good team. I expect them in the AFC championship if not further. screw the bad call. They know what they have and they know how to use it to their advantage
Your comment on the Saints/Sharp makes me wonder what thier depth is like.
I wonder if they could loose him for awhile and still win (ala Whinny).Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.
-
11-17-2009, 12:12 PM #102
Re: Are the Vikings the NFL's best team?
"Marrdro" wrote:
Sharper was out last week, if you didn't know."CulpepperViking16" wrote:
Good stuff my friend.The top 5 are Bengals, Vikings, Patriots, Saints, and Colts.
The bengals are heavily underrated in my opinion. They're 7-2, but should be 8-1. Since they're not, they've been able to stay out of the spotlight, but this team is dangerous. I still think the Vikings are #1, and most of that can be attributed to Favre (he makes receivers look better, dont' tell me TJ would be giving rice 200 yards a game)
The colts haven't lost a game, so I don't think they can look back and improve, which will hurt them later on....plus they're injury plagued as well.
Saints are a powerhouse waiting to fall into a slump. Defense isn't great and Sharper has won a couple of their games for them.
The Patriots are still a gol 'darnit good team. I expect them in the AFC championship if not further. screw the bad call. They know what they have and they know how to use it to their advantage
Your comment on the Saints/Sharp makes me wonder what thier depth is like.
I wonder if they could loose him for awhile and still win (ala Whinny).
=Z=
Thanks to Josdin for the awesome sig!
-
11-17-2009, 12:24 PM #103
Re: Are the Vikings the NFL's best team?
"Zeus" wrote:
and they almost lost to a pathetic Rams team."Marrdro" wrote:
Sharper was out last week, if you didn't know."CulpepperViking16" wrote:
Good stuff my friend.The top 5 are Bengals, Vikings, Patriots, Saints, and Colts.
The bengals are heavily underrated in my opinion. They're 7-2, but should be 8-1. Since they're not, they've been able to stay out of the spotlight, but this team is dangerous. I still think the Vikings are #1, and most of that can be attributed to Favre (he makes receivers look better, dont' tell me TJ would be giving rice 200 yards a game)
The colts haven't lost a game, so I don't think they can look back and improve, which will hurt them later on....plus they're injury plagued as well.
Saints are a powerhouse waiting to fall into a slump. Defense isn't great and Sharper has won a couple of their games for them.
The Patriots are still a gol 'darnit good team. I expect them in the AFC championship if not further. screw the bad call. They know what they have and they know how to use it to their advantage
Your comment on the Saints/Sharp makes me wonder what thier depth is like.
I wonder if they could loose him for awhile and still win (ala Whinny).
=Z=
-
11-17-2009, 12:26 PM #104
Re: Are the Vikings the NFL's best team?
"marstc09" wrote:
His replacement picked Bulger at the goal line. For what it is worth it was Bulger."Zeus" wrote:
and they almost lost to a pathetic Rams team."Marrdro" wrote:
Sharper was out last week, if you didn't know."CulpepperViking16" wrote:
Good stuff My Farvish Friend.The top 5 are Bengals, Vikings, Patriots, Saints, and Colts.
The bengals are heavily underrated in my opinion. They're 7-2, but should be 8-1. Since they're not, they've been able to stay out of the spotlight, but this team is dangerous. I still think the Vikings are #1, and most of that can be attributed to Favre (he makes receivers look better, dont' tell me TJ would be giving rice 200 yards a game)
The colts haven't lost a game, so I don't think they can look back and improve, which will hurt them later on....plus they're injury plagued as well.
Saints are a powerhouse waiting to fall into a slump. Defense isn't great and Sharper has won a couple of their games for them.
The Patriots are still a gol 'darnit good team. I expect them in the AFC championship if not further. screw the bad call. They know what they have and they know how to use it to their advantage
Your comment on the Saints/Sharp makes me wonder what thier depth is like.
I wonder if they could loose him for awhile and still win (ala Whinny).
=Z=
-
Re: Are the Vikings the NFL's best team?
"marstc09" wrote:
shocking!"Zeus" wrote:
and they almost lost to a pathetic Rams team."Marrdro" wrote:
Sharper was out last week, if you didn't know."CulpepperViking16" wrote:
Good stuff my friend.The top 5 are Bengals, Vikings, Patriots, Saints, and Colts.
The bengals are heavily underrated in my opinion. They're 7-2, but should be 8-1. Since they're not, they've been able to stay out of the spotlight, but this team is dangerous. I still think the Vikings are #1, and most of that can be attributed to Favre (he makes receivers look better, dont' tell me TJ would be giving rice 200 yards a game)
The colts haven't lost a game, so I don't think they can look back and improve, which will hurt them later on....plus they're injury plagued as well.
Saints are a powerhouse waiting to fall into a slump. Defense isn't great and Sharper has won a couple of their games for them.
The Patriots are still a gol 'darnit good team. I expect them in the AFC championship if not further. screw the bad call. They know what they have and they know how to use it to their advantage
Your comment on the Saints/Sharp makes me wonder what thier depth is like.
I wonder if they could loose him for awhile and still win (ala Whinny).
=Z=
one might go as far as saying he's a differencemaker and a key asset to their defense.
-
11-17-2009, 12:30 PM #106
Re: Are the Vikings the NFL's best team?
"i_bleed_purple" wrote:
Fire Frazier!"marstc09" wrote:
shocking!"Zeus" wrote:
and they almost lost to a pathetic Rams team."Marrdro" wrote:
Sharper was out last week, if you didn't know."CulpepperViking16" wrote:
Good stuff My Farvish Friend.The top 5 are Bengals, Vikings, Patriots, Saints, and Colts.
The bengals are heavily underrated in my opinion. They're 7-2, but should be 8-1. Since they're not, they've been able to stay out of the spotlight, but this team is dangerous. I still think the Vikings are #1, and most of that can be attributed to Favre (he makes receivers look better, dont' tell me TJ would be giving rice 200 yards a game)
The colts haven't lost a game, so I don't think they can look back and improve, which will hurt them later on....plus they're injury plagued as well.
Saints are a powerhouse waiting to fall into a slump. Defense isn't great and Sharper has won a couple of their games for them.
The Patriots are still a gol 'darnit good team. I expect them in the AFC championship if not further. screw the bad call. They know what they have and they know how to use it to their advantage
Your comment on the Saints/Sharp makes me wonder what thier depth is like.
I wonder if they could loose him for awhile and still win (ala Whinny).
=Z=
one might go as far as saying he's a differencemaker and a key asset to their defense.
Chucklehead can't get the most out of his talent!The true measure of a man is what he'd do knowing he'd never be found out.
-
11-17-2009, 12:39 PM #107
Re: Are the Vikings the NFL's best team?
"marstc09" wrote:
I think you can blame this QB line:"Zeus" wrote:
and they almost lost to a pathetic Rams team."Marrdro" wrote:
Sharper was out last week, if you didn't know."CulpepperViking16" wrote:
Good stuff my friend.The top 5 are Bengals, Vikings, Patriots, Saints, and Colts.
The bengals are heavily underrated in my opinion. They're 7-2, but should be 8-1. Since they're not, they've been able to stay out of the spotlight, but this team is dangerous. I still think the Vikings are #1, and most of that can be attributed to Favre (he makes receivers look better, dont' tell me TJ would be giving rice 200 yards a game)
The colts haven't lost a game, so I don't think they can look back and improve, which will hurt them later on....plus they're injury plagued as well.
Saints are a powerhouse waiting to fall into a slump. Defense isn't great and Sharper has won a couple of their games for them.
The Patriots are still a gol 'darnit good team. I expect them in the AFC championship if not further. screw the bad call. They know what they have and they know how to use it to their advantage
Your comment on the Saints/Sharp makes me wonder what thier depth is like.
I wonder if they could loose him for awhile and still win (ala Whinny).
18 26 69.2 223 8.6 2 2 1 6 89.1 and the fumble by Colston more than anything the Saints defense did.
=Z=
Thanks to Josdin for the awesome sig!
-
11-17-2009, 12:52 PM #108
Re: Are the Vikings the NFL's best team?
"Zeus" wrote:
The Rams scored 23 points. Before that they averaged 10."marstc09" wrote:
I think you can blame this QB line:"Zeus" wrote:
and they almost lost to a pathetic Rams team."Marrdro" wrote:
Sharper was out last week, if you didn't know."CulpepperViking16" wrote:
Good stuff my friend.The top 5 are Bengals, Vikings, Patriots, Saints, and Colts.
The bengals are heavily underrated in my opinion. They're 7-2, but should be 8-1. Since they're not, they've been able to stay out of the spotlight, but this team is dangerous. I still think the Vikings are #1, and most of that can be attributed to Favre (he makes receivers look better, dont' tell me TJ would be giving rice 200 yards a game)
The colts haven't lost a game, so I don't think they can look back and improve, which will hurt them later on....plus they're injury plagued as well.
Saints are a powerhouse waiting to fall into a slump. Defense isn't great and Sharper has won a couple of their games for them.
The Patriots are still a gol 'darnit good team. I expect them in the AFC championship if not further. screw the bad call. They know what they have and they know how to use it to their advantage
Your comment on the Saints/Sharp makes me wonder what thier depth is like.
I wonder if they could loose him for awhile and still win (ala Whinny).
18 26 69.2 223 8.6 2 2 1 6 89.1 and the fumble by Colston more than anything the Saints defense did.
=Z=
-
Re: Are the Vikings the NFL's best team?
"marstc09" wrote:
The Rams scored 23 points. Before that they averaged 10."Zeus" wrote:
I think you can blame this QB line:"marstc09" wrote:
and they almost lost to a pathetic Rams team."Zeus" wrote:
Sharper was out last week, if you didn't know."Marrdro" wrote:
Good stuff my friend.[quote author=CulpepperViking16 link=topic=54039.msg1018057#msg1018057 date=1258480105]
The top 5 are Bengals, Vikings, Patriots, Saints, and Colts.
The bengals are heavily underrated in my opinion. They're 7-2, but should be 8-1. Since they're not, they've been able to stay out of the spotlight, but this team is dangerous. I still think the Vikings are #1, and most of that can be attributed to Favre (he makes receivers look better, dont' tell me TJ would be giving rice 200 yards a game)
The colts haven't lost a game, so I don't think they can look back and improve, which will hurt them later on....plus they're injury plagued as well.
Saints are a powerhouse waiting to fall into a slump. Defense isn't great and Sharper has won a couple of their games for them.
The Patriots are still a gol 'darnit good team. I expect them in the AFC championship if not further. screw the bad call. They know what they have and they know how to use it to their advantage
Your comment on the Saints/Sharp makes me wonder what thier depth is like.
I wonder if they could loose him for awhile and still win (ala Whinny).
18 26 69.2 223 8.6 2 2 1 6 89.1 and the fumble by Colston more than anything the Saints defense did.
=Z=
[/quote]
its the QB's fault.
I mean, how could you possibly play good defense when your rating is only 89.1?
-
11-17-2009, 12:56 PM #110
Re: Are the Vikings the NFL's best team?
"i_bleed_purple" wrote:
The Rams scored 23 points. Before that they averaged 10."marstc09" wrote:
I think you can blame this QB line:"Zeus" wrote:
and they almost lost to a pathetic Rams team."marstc09" wrote:
Sharper was out last week, if you didn't know."Zeus" wrote:
Good stuff my friend.[quote author=Marrdro link=topic=54039.msg1018061#msg1018061 date=1258480320]
[quote author=CulpepperViking16 link=topic=54039.msg1018057#msg1018057 date=1258480105]
The top 5 are Bengals, Vikings, Patriots, Saints, and Colts.
The bengals are heavily underrated in my opinion. They're 7-2, but should be 8-1. Since they're not, they've been able to stay out of the spotlight, but this team is dangerous. I still think the Vikings are #1, and most of that can be attributed to Favre (he makes receivers look better, dont' tell me TJ would be giving rice 200 yards a game)
The colts haven't lost a game, so I don't think they can look back and improve, which will hurt them later on....plus they're injury plagued as well.
Saints are a powerhouse waiting to fall into a slump. Defense isn't great and Sharper has won a couple of their games for them.
The Patriots are still a gol 'darnit good team. I expect them in the AFC championship if not further. screw the bad call. They know what they have and they know how to use it to their advantage
Your comment on the Saints/Sharp makes me wonder what thier depth is like.
I wonder if they could loose him for awhile and still win (ala Whinny).
18 26 69.2 223 8.6 2 2 1 6 89.1 and the fumble by Colston more than anything the Saints defense did.
[/quote]
its the QB's fault.
I mean, how could you possibly play good defense when your rating is only 89.1?
[/quote]
2 picks and a fumble (by Colston).
Only 1 turnover by their defense means -2 TO differential on the day.
Rather than sarcastically bleating, perhaps you could actually analyze and opine.
=Z=
Thanks to Josdin for the awesome sig!
Similar Threads
-
With NFL's new salary cap, Vikings will find a way
By Marrdro in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA ForumReplies: 6Last Post: 07-29-2011, 10:19 PM -
NFL's Buccaneers For Sale - Terrible Team Yours For ~$1 Billion
By Zeus in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 3Last Post: 10-29-2009, 10:32 AM -
Vikings' offensive line led the way for NFL's best
By singersp in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 0Last Post: 01-03-2009, 06:58 AM -
NFL's All-Criminal Team
By singersp in forum General NFL DiscussionReplies: 18Last Post: 04-15-2008, 07:21 AM -
Vikings are NFL's 5th best rushing attack
By Braddock in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 17Last Post: 07-11-2007, 10:07 AM



Reply With Quote





Bookmarks