Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Vikings new OL

  1. #1
    Purple Floyd's Avatar
    Purple Floyd is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    16,646
    Blog Entries
    1

    Vikings new OL

    Hey Marr, Maybe this is a good guy to pick up to replace Cook :lol:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lHtSaAHiAM

  2. #2
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,935

    Re:Vikings new OL

    Purple Floyd wrote:
    Hey Marr, Maybe this is a good guy to pick up to replace Cook :lol:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lHtSaAHiAM
    Can't see youtube at work. Besides, didn't we draft a replacement for Cook already. Why do we need another?
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

  3. #3
    BleedinPandG is offline Coach
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    969

    Re:Vikings new OL

    My guess is it's the video of the college guy taking the entire play off... if it is, that guy does have one advantage over Cook... he doesn't false start
    The true measure of a man is what he'd do knowing he'd never be found out.

  4. #4
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,935

    Re:Vikings new OL

    BleedinPandG wrote:
    My guess is it's the video of the college guy taking the entire play off... if it is, that guy does have one advantage over Cook... he doesn't false start
    OK, gotcha. That would be funny.

    On a side note, still don't know why people hack on Cook. Foley was the cat that drafted him (to early) and the Chiller was the Coach who moved him out there and played him without a better option.

    All Cook did was go out and do his best.

    People should be hacking on the Coaching staff and the FO pukes for taking so long to fix the RT (and C) positions.

    Anyone else notice that this is the first year our starting QB has made it to week 13?
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

  5. #5
    jargomcfargo's Avatar
    jargomcfargo is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    4,776

    Re:Vikings new OL

    Marrdro wrote:
    BleedinPandG wrote:
    My guess is it's the video of the college guy taking the entire play off... if it is, that guy does have one advantage over Cook... he doesn't false start
    OK, gotcha. That would be funny.

    On a side note, still don't know why people hack on Cook. Foley was the cat that drafted him (to early) and the Chiller was the Coach who moved him out there and played him without a better option.

    All Cook did was go out and do his best.

    People should be hacking on the Coaching staff and the FO pukes for taking so long to fix the RT (and C) positions.

    Anyone else notice that this is the first year our starting QB has made it to week 13?
    You mean the same QB who hasn't missed a game in how many seasons?
    That QB?
    What a surprise!

    As to the other 2 on this team, they didn't even get through training camp without injuries.

    I agree with you when it comes to Cook. He did the best he could.
    “What takes a quarterback to the next level is not arm strength or mobility or any of that stuff. It’s the ability to play on critical downs. Manage third downs, or red zones or four-minute or two-minute situations"
    Dilfer

  6. #6
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,935

    Re:Vikings new OL

    jargomcfargo wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    BleedinPandG wrote:
    My guess is it's the video of the college guy taking the entire play off... if it is, that guy does have one advantage over Cook... he doesn't false start
    OK, gotcha. That would be funny.

    On a side note, still don't know why people hack on Cook. Foley was the cat that drafted him (to early) and the Chiller was the Coach who moved him out there and played him without a better option.

    All Cook did was go out and do his best.

    People should be hacking on the Coaching staff and the FO pukes for taking so long to fix the RT (and C) positions.

    Anyone else notice that this is the first year our starting QB has made it to week 13?
    You mean the same QB who hasn't missed a game in how many seasons?
    That QB?
    What a surprise!

    As to the other 2 on this team, they didn't even get through training camp without injuries.

    I agree with you when it comes to Cook. He did the best he could.
    Comeon Doc, you didn't worry about our OL protecting him this year?

    Yes, he's one tough SOB but without the improvement we've had on the OL, even he could've been bent a bit by some of those funky 3-4's we've seen this year.
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

  7. #7
    jargomcfargo's Avatar
    jargomcfargo is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    4,776

    Re:Vikings new OL

    Marrdro wrote:
    jargomcfargo wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    BleedinPandG wrote:
    My guess is it's the video of the college guy taking the entire play off... if it is, that guy does have one advantage over Cook... he doesn't false start
    OK, gotcha. That would be funny.

    On a side note, still don't know why people hack on Cook. Foley was the cat that drafted him (to early) and the Chiller was the Coach who moved him out there and played him without a better option.

    All Cook did was go out and do his best.

    People should be hacking on the Coaching staff and the FO pukes for taking so long to fix the RT (and C) positions.

    Anyone else notice that this is the first year our starting QB has made it to week 13?
    You mean the same QB who hasn't missed a game in how many seasons?
    That QB?
    What a surprise!

    As to the other 2 on this team, they didn't even get through training camp without injuries.

    I agree with you when it comes to Cook. He did the best he could.
    Comeon Doc, you didn't worry about our OL protecting him this year?

    Yes, he's one tough SOB but without the improvement we've had on the OL, even he could've been bent a bit by some of those funky 3-4's we've seen this year.
    Darn right I was worried. Quick question. Wouldn't you be more worried with a young QB with a track record of never finishing a full season due to injury.

    Even you must admit that part of the failure to protect the QB is the responsibility of the QB.

    Kevon always said the line was fine, the QB wasn't.
    I tend to agree.
    “What takes a quarterback to the next level is not arm strength or mobility or any of that stuff. It’s the ability to play on critical downs. Manage third downs, or red zones or four-minute or two-minute situations"
    Dilfer

  8. #8
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,935

    Re:Vikings new OL

    jargomcfargo wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    jargomcfargo wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    BleedinPandG wrote:
    My guess is it's the video of the college guy taking the entire play off... if it is, that guy does have one advantage over Cook... he doesn't false start
    OK, gotcha. That would be funny.

    On a side note, still don't know why people hack on Cook. Foley was the cat that drafted him (to early) and the Chiller was the Coach who moved him out there and played him without a better option.

    All Cook did was go out and do his best.

    People should be hacking on the Coaching staff and the FO pukes for taking so long to fix the RT (and C) positions.

    Anyone else notice that this is the first year our starting QB has made it to week 13?
    You mean the same QB who hasn't missed a game in how many seasons?
    That QB?
    What a surprise!

    As to the other 2 on this team, they didn't even get through training camp without injuries.

    I agree with you when it comes to Cook. He did the best he could.
    Comeon Doc, you didn't worry about our OL protecting him this year?

    Yes, he's one tough SOB but without the improvement we've had on the OL, even he could've been bent a bit by some of those funky 3-4's we've seen this year.
    Darn right I was worried. Quick question. Wouldn't you be more worried with a young QB with a track record of never finishing a full season due to injury.

    Even you must admit that part of the failure to protect the QB is the responsibility of the QB.

    Kevon always said the line was fine, the QB wasn't.
    I tend to agree.
    Of course I would. And I do agree on the QB's role. Still doesn't mean that I wasn't worried about him making through a full year.

    Hell, we've had seasoned vets broke each and every year, not just youngsters my friend.
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

  9. #9
    NordicNed is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    9,513

    Re:Vikings new OL

    LMFBO,,,What the hell is that lineman doing? Did he fall asleep? I've never seen that before in my life...LMAO


    I LOVE THE SMELL OF VICTORY IN THE MORNING AIR.

  10. #10
    jargomcfargo's Avatar
    jargomcfargo is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    4,776

    Re:Vikings new OL

    Marrdro wrote:
    jargomcfargo wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    jargomcfargo wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    BleedinPandG wrote:
    My guess is it's the video of the college guy taking the entire play off... if it is, that guy does have one advantage over Cook... he doesn't false start
    OK, gotcha. That would be funny.

    On a side note, still don't know why people hack on Cook. Foley was the cat that drafted him (to early) and the Chiller was the Coach who moved him out there and played him without a better option.

    All Cook did was go out and do his best.

    People should be hacking on the Coaching staff and the FO pukes for taking so long to fix the RT (and C) positions.

    Anyone else notice that this is the first year our starting QB has made it to week 13?
    You mean the same QB who hasn't missed a game in how many seasons?
    That QB?
    What a surprise!

    As to the other 2 on this team, they didn't even get through training camp without injuries.

    I agree with you when it comes to Cook. He did the best he could.
    Comeon Doc, you didn't worry about our OL protecting him this year?

    Yes, he's one tough SOB but without the improvement we've had on the OL, even he could've been bent a bit by some of those funky 3-4's we've seen this year.
    Darn right I was worried. Quick question. Wouldn't you be more worried with a young QB with a track record of never finishing a full season due to injury.

    Even you must admit that part of the failure to protect the QB is the responsibility of the QB.

    Kevon always said the line was fine, the QB wasn't.
    I tend to agree.
    Of course I would. And I do agree on the QB's role. Still doesn't mean that I wasn't worried about him making through a full year.

    Hell, we've had seasoned vets broke each and every year, not just youngsters my friend.
    Actually, like you I'm almost certain, I was concerned he would get injured but still play, like last year.
    That is still a possibility.
    But this line is keeping him pretty clean. And he is one tough old buzzard.

    BTW, this purple floyd guy seems alright for a waterboy.
    Hope he don't turn out like that Uffda guy!
    “What takes a quarterback to the next level is not arm strength or mobility or any of that stuff. It’s the ability to play on critical downs. Manage third downs, or red zones or four-minute or two-minute situations"
    Dilfer

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •