Thread: Vikings new OL
-
Vikings new OL
Hey Marr, Maybe this is a good guy to pick up to replace Cook :lol:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lHtSaAHiAM
-
12-04-2009, 07:02 AM #2
Re:Vikings new OL
Purple Floyd wrote:
Can't see youtube at work. Besides, didn't we draft a replacement for Cook already. Why do we need another?Hey Marr, Maybe this is a good guy to pick up to replace Cook :lol:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0lHtSaAHiAMMany many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.
-
12-04-2009, 07:08 AM #3
Re:Vikings new OL
My guess is it's the video of the college guy taking the entire play off... if it is, that guy does have one advantage over Cook... he doesn't false start
The true measure of a man is what he'd do knowing he'd never be found out.
-
12-04-2009, 07:42 AM #4
Re:Vikings new OL
BleedinPandG wrote:
OK, gotcha. That would be funny.My guess is it's the video of the college guy taking the entire play off... if it is, that guy does have one advantage over Cook... he doesn't false start
On a side note, still don't know why people hack on Cook. Foley was the cat that drafted him (to early) and the Chiller was the Coach who moved him out there and played him without a better option.
All Cook did was go out and do his best.
People should be hacking on the Coaching staff and the FO pukes for taking so long to fix the RT (and C) positions.
Anyone else notice that this is the first year our starting QB has made it to week 13?Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.
-
12-04-2009, 08:50 AM #5
Re:Vikings new OL
Marrdro wrote:
You mean the same QB who hasn't missed a game in how many seasons?BleedinPandG wrote:
OK, gotcha. That would be funny.My guess is it's the video of the college guy taking the entire play off... if it is, that guy does have one advantage over Cook... he doesn't false start
On a side note, still don't know why people hack on Cook. Foley was the cat that drafted him (to early) and the Chiller was the Coach who moved him out there and played him without a better option.
All Cook did was go out and do his best.
People should be hacking on the Coaching staff and the FO pukes for taking so long to fix the RT (and C) positions.
Anyone else notice that this is the first year our starting QB has made it to week 13?
That QB?
What a surprise!
As to the other 2 on this team, they didn't even get through training camp without injuries.
I agree with you when it comes to Cook. He did the best he could.“What takes a quarterback to the next level is not arm strength or mobility or any of that stuff. It’s the ability to play on critical downs. Manage third downs, or red zones or four-minute or two-minute situations"
Dilfer
-
12-04-2009, 08:52 AM #6
Re:Vikings new OL
jargomcfargo wrote:
Comeon Doc, you didn't worry about our OL protecting him this year?Marrdro wrote:
You mean the same QB who hasn't missed a game in how many seasons?BleedinPandG wrote:
OK, gotcha. That would be funny.My guess is it's the video of the college guy taking the entire play off... if it is, that guy does have one advantage over Cook... he doesn't false start
On a side note, still don't know why people hack on Cook. Foley was the cat that drafted him (to early) and the Chiller was the Coach who moved him out there and played him without a better option.
All Cook did was go out and do his best.
People should be hacking on the Coaching staff and the FO pukes for taking so long to fix the RT (and C) positions.
Anyone else notice that this is the first year our starting QB has made it to week 13?
That QB?
What a surprise!
As to the other 2 on this team, they didn't even get through training camp without injuries.
I agree with you when it comes to Cook. He did the best he could.
Yes, he's one tough SOB but without the improvement we've had on the OL, even he could've been bent a bit by some of those funky 3-4's we've seen this year.Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.
-
12-04-2009, 08:59 AM #7
Re:Vikings new OL
Marrdro wrote:
Darn right I was worried. Quick question. Wouldn't you be more worried with a young QB with a track record of never finishing a full season due to injury.jargomcfargo wrote:
Comeon Doc, you didn't worry about our OL protecting him this year?Marrdro wrote:
You mean the same QB who hasn't missed a game in how many seasons?BleedinPandG wrote:
OK, gotcha. That would be funny.My guess is it's the video of the college guy taking the entire play off... if it is, that guy does have one advantage over Cook... he doesn't false start
On a side note, still don't know why people hack on Cook. Foley was the cat that drafted him (to early) and the Chiller was the Coach who moved him out there and played him without a better option.
All Cook did was go out and do his best.
People should be hacking on the Coaching staff and the FO pukes for taking so long to fix the RT (and C) positions.
Anyone else notice that this is the first year our starting QB has made it to week 13?
That QB?
What a surprise!
As to the other 2 on this team, they didn't even get through training camp without injuries.
I agree with you when it comes to Cook. He did the best he could.
Yes, he's one tough SOB but without the improvement we've had on the OL, even he could've been bent a bit by some of those funky 3-4's we've seen this year.
Even you must admit that part of the failure to protect the QB is the responsibility of the QB.
Kevon always said the line was fine, the QB wasn't.
I tend to agree.“What takes a quarterback to the next level is not arm strength or mobility or any of that stuff. It’s the ability to play on critical downs. Manage third downs, or red zones or four-minute or two-minute situations"
Dilfer
-
12-04-2009, 09:03 AM #8
Re:Vikings new OL
jargomcfargo wrote:
Of course I would. And I do agree on the QB's role. Still doesn't mean that I wasn't worried about him making through a full year.Marrdro wrote:
Darn right I was worried. Quick question. Wouldn't you be more worried with a young QB with a track record of never finishing a full season due to injury.jargomcfargo wrote:
Comeon Doc, you didn't worry about our OL protecting him this year?Marrdro wrote:
You mean the same QB who hasn't missed a game in how many seasons?BleedinPandG wrote:
OK, gotcha. That would be funny.My guess is it's the video of the college guy taking the entire play off... if it is, that guy does have one advantage over Cook... he doesn't false start
On a side note, still don't know why people hack on Cook. Foley was the cat that drafted him (to early) and the Chiller was the Coach who moved him out there and played him without a better option.
All Cook did was go out and do his best.
People should be hacking on the Coaching staff and the FO pukes for taking so long to fix the RT (and C) positions.
Anyone else notice that this is the first year our starting QB has made it to week 13?
That QB?
What a surprise!
As to the other 2 on this team, they didn't even get through training camp without injuries.
I agree with you when it comes to Cook. He did the best he could.
Yes, he's one tough SOB but without the improvement we've had on the OL, even he could've been bent a bit by some of those funky 3-4's we've seen this year.
Even you must admit that part of the failure to protect the QB is the responsibility of the QB.
Kevon always said the line was fine, the QB wasn't.
I tend to agree.
Hell, we've had seasoned vets broke each and every year, not just youngsters my friend.
Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.
-
12-04-2009, 09:06 AM #9
Re:Vikings new OL
LMFBO,,,What the hell is that lineman doing? Did he fall asleep? I've never seen that before in my life...LMAO

I LOVE THE SMELL OF VICTORY IN THE MORNING AIR.
-
12-04-2009, 09:10 AM #10
Re:Vikings new OL
Marrdro wrote:
Actually, like you I'm almost certain, I was concerned he would get injured but still play, like last year.jargomcfargo wrote:
Of course I would. And I do agree on the QB's role. Still doesn't mean that I wasn't worried about him making through a full year.Marrdro wrote:
Darn right I was worried. Quick question. Wouldn't you be more worried with a young QB with a track record of never finishing a full season due to injury.jargomcfargo wrote:
Comeon Doc, you didn't worry about our OL protecting him this year?Marrdro wrote:
You mean the same QB who hasn't missed a game in how many seasons?BleedinPandG wrote:
OK, gotcha. That would be funny.My guess is it's the video of the college guy taking the entire play off... if it is, that guy does have one advantage over Cook... he doesn't false start
On a side note, still don't know why people hack on Cook. Foley was the cat that drafted him (to early) and the Chiller was the Coach who moved him out there and played him without a better option.
All Cook did was go out and do his best.
People should be hacking on the Coaching staff and the FO pukes for taking so long to fix the RT (and C) positions.
Anyone else notice that this is the first year our starting QB has made it to week 13?
That QB?
What a surprise!
As to the other 2 on this team, they didn't even get through training camp without injuries.
I agree with you when it comes to Cook. He did the best he could.
Yes, he's one tough SOB but without the improvement we've had on the OL, even he could've been bent a bit by some of those funky 3-4's we've seen this year.
Even you must admit that part of the failure to protect the QB is the responsibility of the QB.
Kevon always said the line was fine, the QB wasn't.
I tend to agree.
Hell, we've had seasoned vets broke each and every year, not just youngsters my friend.
That is still a possibility.
But this line is keeping him pretty clean. And he is one tough old buzzard.
BTW, this purple floyd guy seems alright for a waterboy.
Hope he don't turn out like that Uffda guy!“What takes a quarterback to the next level is not arm strength or mobility or any of that stuff. It’s the ability to play on critical downs. Manage third downs, or red zones or four-minute or two-minute situations"
Dilfer



Reply With Quote





Bookmarks