Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. 08-28-2012, 06:09 AM #1
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Send a message via MSN to singersp
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    51,195

    Vikings: 'Madden 13' makers are not fans

    Minnesota Vikings: 'Madden 13' makers are not fans

    Minnesota Vikings: 'Madden 13' makers are not fans - TwinCities.com

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 08-28-2012, 10:59 AM #2
    NodakPaul's Avatar
    NodakPaul
    NodakPaul is offline Jersey Retired
    Send a message via ICQ to NodakPaul Send a message via AIM to NodakPaul Send a message via MSN to NodakPaul Send a message via Yahoo to NodakPaul
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    West Fargo, ND
    Posts
    17,309
    Blog Entries
    1
    I don't think they were too terribly far off on those player rankings...
    Zeus wrote:
    When are you going to realize that picking out the 20 bad throws this year and ignoring the 300 good ones does not make your point?

    =Z=
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 08-29-2012, 01:56 AM #3
    Minniman's Avatar
    Minniman
    Minniman is offline Coach
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    940
    The Vikings were the third worst team in the NFL for a reason.

    It is not like they went 12-4 and ended up being poorly rated.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 08-31-2012, 10:52 PM #4
    Paul Hodel's Avatar
    Paul Hodel
    Paul Hodel is offline Waterboy
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1
    They still play pretty good despite their rating.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 09-01-2012, 01:04 AM #5
    gregair13's Avatar
    gregair13
    gregair13 is offline Jersey Retired
    Send a message via AIM to gregair13 Send a message via Yahoo to gregair13
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Edmonton, AB
    Posts
    14,531
    Ponder too high.
    We're bringing purple back.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 09-01-2012, 07:20 AM #6
    NodakPaul's Avatar
    NodakPaul
    NodakPaul is offline Jersey Retired
    Send a message via ICQ to NodakPaul Send a message via AIM to NodakPaul Send a message via MSN to NodakPaul Send a message via Yahoo to NodakPaul
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    West Fargo, ND
    Posts
    17,309
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by gregair13 View Post
    Ponder too high.
    He is a 75, ranked 35th among QBs. How is that too high? I actually think they nailed Ponder - low in strength and awareness, high in accuracy. That sounds pretty much like how he played last year.

    Of course, he will be in the 90's after our Super Bowl run this year...
    Zeus wrote:
    When are you going to realize that picking out the 20 bad throws this year and ignoring the 300 good ones does not make your point?

    =Z=
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 09-02-2012, 05:25 PM #7
    Zeus's Avatar
    Zeus
    Zeus is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Minnesota.
    Posts
    23,846
    Quote Originally Posted by NodakPaul View Post
    He is a 75, ranked 35th among QBs. How is that too high? I actually think they nailed Ponder - low in strength and awareness, high in accuracy. That sounds pretty much like how he played last year.

    Of course, he will be in the 90's after our Super Bowl run this year...
    They don't have a category for "Skittish in the pocket".

    =Z=

    Thanks to Josdin for the awesome sig!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Harrison Smith fined $21K for hit against Chargers | Vikings: 5 players signed to practice squad »

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules