Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,212

    Vikings Lose, But Appear To Be For Real


    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  2. #2
    fabybaby32's Avatar
    fabybaby32 is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    129

    Re: Vikings Lose, But Appear To Be For Real

    That is good to see that finally someone is giving us some
    credit, but I dont really care.
    I dont mind when the media bashes us.
    We know we have a lot of potential, its just whether we execute.
    As for the part on K-Will, I think he is fine.
    If you watch him, on most plays he is doubled, especially on passing downs when pat isnt in there.
    Im sure he will step it up soon.

  3. #3
    Purple Kool Aid's Avatar
    Purple Kool Aid is offline Training Camp
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    46

    Re: Vikings Lose, But Appear To Be For Real

    the title of the article is completely tue (imo).
    I think through 3 weeks we are able to see that this is the kind of ball we will play all season.
    Our defense is legit and I don't think our offense is THAT far off.
    Each game they are a penalty or 2 away from scoring TDs (Carolina game had 2 penalties on 2 trips inside the 10).


    We are a playoff team and we are capable of taking the division.
    At this point I think Chicago is slightly better, but it is a long season.
    http://purplekool-aid.blogspot.com/

  4. #4
    Vikes_King's Avatar
    Vikes_King is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    7,104

    Re: Vikings Lose, But Appear To Be For Real

    i personally dont think chicago is better, but i do agree they're the better team right now, better organized and have been together longer


    http://vikesking.blogspot.com/

    "We’ll win our own Super Bowl, with our own players. Real Vikings. Something Brett Favre can never be."

    - Dan Calabrese

  5. #5
    Slade is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,843

    Re: Vikings Lose, But Appear To Be For Real

    If we can score some offensive TD's on a consistent basis, we will be dangerous. These FG's in the red zone are ok & all, but you can't be a playoff contender if you can't get the 6 pts

  6. #6
    cajunvike's Avatar
    cajunvike is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    32,063

    Re: Vikings Lose, But Appear To Be For Real

    We will make the playoffs...and hit our peak just then...just like the Stillers did last season!!!
    The DEFENSE will lead the way...followed closely by our STUD running game!!!!
    BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE

  7. #7
    Purple Kool Aid's Avatar
    Purple Kool Aid is offline Training Camp
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    46

    Re: Vikings Lose, But Appear To Be For Real

    "Vikes_King" wrote:
    i personally dont think chicago is better, but i do agree they're the better team right now, better organized and have been together longer
    I'm not trying to be a smart ass, but wouldn't being a better team mean they are better?
    Expand more on your thoughts so I can understand.
    http://purplekool-aid.blogspot.com/

  8. #8
    WisconsinSucks's Avatar
    WisconsinSucks is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    567

    Re: Vikings Lose, But Appear To Be For Real

    "Purple" wrote:
    "Vikes_King" wrote:
    i personally dont think chicago is better, but i do agree they're the better team right now, better organized and have been together longer
    I'm not trying to be a smart jiggly butt, but wouldn't being a better team mean they are better?
    Expand more on your thoughts so I can understand.
    Getting a little technical there Kool Aid.
    You know he meant overall.

  9. #9
    marcosMN is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Mpls, MN
    Posts
    2,097

    Re: Vikings Lose, But Appear To Be For Real

    "Purple" wrote:
    "Vikes_King" wrote:
    i personally dont think chicago is better, but i do agree they're the better team right now, better organized and have been together longer
    I'm not trying to be a smart jiggly butt, but wouldn't being a better team mean they are better?
    Expand more on your thoughts so I can understand.
    I think he was referring to individual talent vs. a unit working in unison...

    If I'm not mistaken...
    -Sno

  10. #10
    iluvbigtds is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    121

    Re: Vikings Lose, But Appear To Be For Real

    That's exactly what I was thinking watching the game.
    I was just impressed at how well we played, I didn't really care that we lost.
    At the beginning of the season I was just hoping we could sneak into the playoffs because I knew we'd be a great team at the end of the year and could cause some damage, but we're a force already and that's just amazing with the new systems and players.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Could the Vikings lose two coordinators?
    By COJOMAY in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 01-13-2009, 07:40 AM
  2. Anybody You Know lose a Vikings Jacket?
    By COJOMAY in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-07-2008, 07:38 PM
  3. The Vikings will lose to the Hawks
    By jeebs in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 12-12-2004, 11:41 AM
  4. Vikings lose to Philly LOL!!!!!
    By packmanxxxi in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 113
    Last Post: 09-24-2004, 06:15 PM
  5. Vikings Lose!
    By Webby in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 10-23-2003, 03:47 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •