-
07-24-2006, 05:32 PM #21
Re: Vikings go with weak Plan B at QB
"RandyMoss8404" wrote:
I agree!"Big C" wrote:
I'm confused about the blind love for Matt SchaubMcMahon is no Matt Schaub (that man's a starter) but he is good enough for a backup. He knows the playbook. He will have legitimate recievers, a running game and a formidable offensive line. If Childress calls smart plays McMahon could possibly have a 50-50 record if forced to start.
I'm not too worried.
He's 0-2, has completed less than 50% of his passes, and played well against our pathetic excuse for a defense and the Patriots practice squad
I just don't understand
-
07-25-2006, 02:20 AM #22
Re: Vikings go with weak Plan B at QB
"seaniemck7" wrote:
So how was that any different from Daunte's season that he got chastized for? :wink:I'm with Big C on this one. McMahon knows the offense and went 2-5 five last year with the Igles. They had no running game at the time, and the wheels were falling off..........
"If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"
Similar Threads
-
Without Rice, the Vikings need a new plan at WR
By singersp in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA ForumReplies: 25Last Post: 05-25-2011, 10:24 PM -
Is Jackson Vikings' weak link? QB motivated by critics questioning his ability
By singersp in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 279Last Post: 05-28-2008, 07:42 PM -
NFC is weak!
By RussC in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 2Last Post: 11-21-2006, 05:16 AM -
Weak NFC North
By darkflood in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 8Last Post: 08-07-2006, 06:41 AM -
Vikings: Defensive weak spot gets challenge
By singersp in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 0Last Post: 11-09-2005, 12:51 PM





Reply With Quote



Bookmarks