Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,266

    Vikings to face 3rd-string QB

    Vikings to face Browns 3rd-string QB

    Vikings to face Browns 3rd-string QB | kare11.com

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  2. #2
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,266
    Couple that with the Browns trading away their star RB in their quest for the #1 draft pick in 2014 & the Vikings should be able to get a win at home, even though the Browns have the 5th best defense. 1st against the run, 12/13th against the pass.

    If we lose, shit gonna get real ugly.
    Last edited by singersp; 09-20-2013 at 07:32 AM.

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  3. #3
    Minniman's Avatar
    Minniman is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    1,418
    Quote Originally Posted by singersp View Post
    Couple that with the Browns trading away their star RB in their quest for the #1 draft pick in 2014 & the Vikings should be able to get a win at home, even though the Browns have the 5th best defense. 1st against the run, 12/13th against the pass.

    If we lose, shit gonna get real ugly.
    The Vikings have lost to rookies and third stringers before. If the Vikings play vanilla, they could be in trouble.

  4. #4
    smegmavike is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    884
    Vikings have a history of making back ups look like stars. They also have a history of playing down to their competition. Those are tendencies that championship teams rarely show.
    It's time to take advantage of their opportunity to win handily.
    The Browns have a pretty good front seven on defense so it could end up a low scoring defensive struggle.
    I think most of us expect a blow out and good play from the Vikings, in all three phases of the game, for the home opener.
    Anything less could be a source of ongoing frustration, despite winning.

  5. #5
    El Vikingo's Avatar
    El Vikingo is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    4,358
    I laid 90 on Vikings -6,5 ,pretty sure they ll win by 6
    El underdog.

  6. #6
    Purple Floyd's Avatar
    Purple Floyd is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    16,646
    Blog Entries
    1
    We should be even at the QB position then anyway.

  7. #7
    smegmavike is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    884
    Quote Originally Posted by Purple Floyd View Post
    We should be even at the QB position then anyway.
    When's the last time you remember the Vikings playing a game when you thought, 'At least we have a better QB' ?

  8. #8
    Purple Floyd's Avatar
    Purple Floyd is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    16,646
    Blog Entries
    1
    Yeah, probably 2009.

  9. #9
    PackSux!'s Avatar
    PackSux! is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,562
    I bet our 3rd stringer is better than their 3rd stringer. I would even wager that our 3rd stringer is better than our 1st stringer.

  10. #10
    i_bleed_purple's Avatar
    i_bleed_purple is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canadialand
    Posts
    16,777
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by packsux! View Post
    i bet our 3rd stringer is better than their 3rd stringer. I would even wager that our 3rd stringer is better than our 1st stringer.
    mbt?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •