Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 43
  1. #11
    so-cal vike's Avatar
    so-cal vike is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,261

    Re: vikings! contenders or pretenders?

    "vikefan522" wrote:
    they have dominic rhodes and a modern playbook(now)
    their wide recceivers r way betta than ours.
    their pass defense is better.
    their qb situation is just as uncertain as ours.
    We have C. Taylor and have always had a modern playbook.
    Recievers???
    On both ends.
    Our Run D is better.
    At least we have an O-line.


    Again, better on paper...I think not.

  2. #12
    vikefan522's Avatar
    vikefan522 is offline Training Camp
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    37

    Re: vikings! contenders or pretenders?

    lets c what the chargers defense does 2 us!

    the important things we even this drought and win a superbowl! (now)

  3. #13
    vikefan522's Avatar
    vikefan522 is offline Training Camp
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    37

    Re: vikings! contenders or pretenders?

    "so-cal" wrote:
    "vikefan522" wrote:
    they have dominic rhodes and a modern playbook(now)
    their wide recceivers r way betta than ours.
    their pass defense is better.
    their qb situation is just as uncertain as ours.
    We have C. Taylor and have always had a modern playbook.
    Recievers???
    On both ends.
    Our Run D is better.
    At least we have an O-line.


    Again, better on paper...I think not.
    our run defense looks good b/c teams could pass all day!

  4. #14
    so-cal vike's Avatar
    so-cal vike is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,261

    Re: vikings! contenders or pretenders?

    "vikefan522]<br" wrote:

    Not a darn thing!


    [quote author=vikefan522]the important things we even this drought and win a superbowl! (now)

    Now that's something we can agree on.
    Skol Vikings!

  5. #15
    simonsparre is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    350

    Re: vikings! contenders or pretenders?

    Either we will make a turnaround like the Saints or we will get a top 5 draft pick in 2008! Our offense suck and our denfense can't defend the pass. If we wanna compete for a shot at the SB this year we need an impact rookie, who can start from day one (Like Colston and Bush.)

  6. #16
    ultravikingfan's Avatar
    ultravikingfan is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    24,514

    Re: vikings! contenders or pretenders?

    [size=20pt]LMFAO!!![/size]

    (to everything he posted)

  7. #17
    BritishVike's Avatar
    BritishVike is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    143

    Re: vikings! contenders or pretenders?

    There is no chance we are contenders this year.
    I would like to see us show promise that we are getting better, that we have the determination, that we have some talent.
    Personally, i think this team lacks a star, a real driving force, yeah we've got some great players i. e Winfield, Birk, Hutchinson, Williams and Williams etc etc.
    But none of them shout out to me like they give this team an edge.
    Personally i want childress to draft somebody who is gonna be a franchise player, someone who shows leadership as well as talent, preferably a wide reciever who we can call the go-to-guy.
    Ill be happy as long as the Vikes show the remotest ability to put points on the board!At the mo, we're truly dekcuf as i think most will agree.

  8. #18
    BBQ Platypus's Avatar
    BBQ Platypus is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Saint Paul, MN
    Posts
    3,027

    Re: vikings! contenders or pretenders?

    "BritishVike" wrote:
    There is no chance we are contenders this year.
    I would like to see us show promise that we are getting better, that we have the determination, that we have some talent.
    Personally, i think this team lacks a star, a real driving force, yeah we've got some great players i. e Winfield, Birk, Hutchinson, Williams and Williams etc etc.
    But none of them shout out to me like they give this team an edge.
    Personally i want childress to draft somebody who is gonna be a franchise player, someone who shows leadership as well as talent, preferably a wide reciever who we can call the go-to-guy.
    Ill be happy as long as the Vikes show the remotest ability to put points on the board!At the mo, we're truly dekcuf as i think most will agree.
    That's...depressingly accurate. :'(


    "This is my timey-wimey detector. It goes ding when there's stuff."

  9. #19
    Billy Boy is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    1,426

    Re: vikings! contenders or pretenders?

    "vikefan522" wrote:
    yea, at the same time, we've picked up garbarge in free agency.
    That has got to be one of the more uneducated and unsubstantiated comments I have heard.
    Are you familiar with the term role players at all?
    Or team?


    "vikefan522" wrote:
    the draft is a toss up b/c it depends on the top 6, there also to many question marks on the players in the draft.
    That has got to be THE most vanilla comment I have heard.




    All the kids my age pee their pants, it's the coolest.

  10. #20
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,266

    Re: vikings! contenders or pretenders?

    "BBQ" wrote:
    "BritishVike" wrote:
    There is no chance we are contenders this year.
    I would like to see us show promise that we are getting better, that we have the determination, that we have some talent.
    Personally, i think this team lacks a star, a real driving force, yeah we've got some great players i. e Winfield, Birk, Hutchinson, Williams and Williams etc etc.
    But none of them shout out to me like they give this team an edge.
    Personally i want childress to draft somebody who is gonna be a franchise player, someone who shows leadership as well as talent, preferably a wide reciever who we can call the go-to-guy.
    Ill be happy as long as the Vikes show the remotest ability to put points on the board!At the mo, we're truly dekcuf as i think most will agree.
    That's...depressingly accurate. :'(
    Nice to see you back BBQ!

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Minnesota Vikings: Superbowl XLIV contenders?
    By HoosierVike in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-05-2009, 07:24 PM
  2. Separating Playoff Contenders From Pretenders
    By Prophet in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-30-2008, 12:53 PM
  3. Vikings Linebackers: Full stable of contenders
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 06-27-2006, 04:37 AM
  4. We are pretenders tell we prove otherwise
    By vikingsalltheway in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 12-15-2004, 12:40 PM
  5. The Vikes are Pretenders, not Contenters..............
    By GIANTSOVERVIKES in forum Weekly Opponent Talk
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-30-2004, 04:58 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •