Thread: Vikings close to signing Detmer

"Purple" wrote:

Where do you suppose he falls on the depth Chart?
Is he #2 behind Bollinger this week if TJ and Holcomb cant go.
Is he #3 behind Tjack and Bollinger and Holcomb is deactivated?

Yes, if T-Jac and Holcomb are out then he will be Bollingers backup.

I say we just get rid of Holcomb now. I hate that guy, he sucks and plays like a puss.

Would he be T-jacks back up in a couple of weeks or would Bollinger keep his back up role?

"Purple" wrote:

Would he be T-jacks back up in a couple of weeks or would Bollinger keep his back up role?

Funny thing is I dont even think the Vikings have an answer to that question the way the QB's are dropping like flies.

"IBleedPurple28" wrote:

Horrible....He wont ever play, but still. Id rather see us sign Aaron Brooks out of all the poohie QB's in FA.

He's just a stop gap QB, Aaron Brooks isn't even familiar with our offense, so if he had to play he wouldn't even know what to do.

Makes sense, though. If you're going to bring in an insurance policy for this week, and all that's available is crap, you pick the crap that has the smallest learning curve.

"IBleedPurple28" wrote:

I say we just get rid of Holcomb now. I hate that guy, he sucks and plays like a puss.

I really don't think there is a great difference between any of the 4... will just have to go with the hot hand, which currently is Brook.

Chilly shouldn't be afraid to pull any of them.

CHOO CHOO, The train from Philly to Minneapolis is leaving, All washed up Eagles get on!

I hope he did not cost the Vikings much.
:-[

"josdin00" wrote:

Makes sense, though. If you're going to bring in an insurance policy for this week, and all that's available is crap, you pick the crap that has the smallest learning curve.

Agreed.

"josdin00" wrote:

Makes sense, though. If you're going to bring in an insurance policy for this week, and all that's available is crap, you pick the crap that has the smallest learning curve.

That is a good point.