Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 33
  1. #11
    Mikecarter81's Avatar
    Mikecarter81 is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    823

    Re: Vikings 2008 vs 1993 sack attack

    "gagarr" wrote:
    "Mikecarter81" wrote:
    "jmcdon00" wrote:
    If the D-line gets 40 sacks this year I think the 2008 squad will probably have the best defense in the NFL and the best Viking D ever. They could be scary good if that happens.
    Wow, you need to go study your viking history.
    Go look up the sack totals of 1988.
    Doleman/ Millard were darn near unblockable.
    I think
    Doleman had like 20 and millard had 18.5. That is almost 40 between the right side.
    Yet, the Purple people eaters were better then even that, they didn't start recording sacks offically until 1982 I beleive.

    Mike
    I didn't say the "greatest DL"...
    I said the "last great DL".
    Is there a DL since '93 that you would consider better than '93?
    I also wasn't talking to you.

    Mike
    I am an avid Viking fan, but also am an avid restoration guy of vintage Mopar(Chrysler, Dodge, Plymouth)B bodies

  2. #12
    gagarr's Avatar
    gagarr is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    2,411

    Re: Vikings 2008 vs 1993 sack attack

    "Mikecarter81" wrote:
    "gagarr" wrote:
    "Mikecarter81" wrote:
    "jmcdon00" wrote:
    If the D-line gets 40 sacks this year I think the 2008 squad will probably have the best defense in the NFL and the best Viking D ever. They could be scary good if that happens.
    Wow, you need to go study your viking history.
    Go look up the sack totals of 1988.
    Doleman/ Millard were darn near unblockable.
    I think
    Doleman had like 20 and millard had 18.5. That is almost 40 between the right side.
    Yet, the Purple people eaters were better then even that, they didn't start recording sacks offically until 1982 I beleive.

    Mike
    I didn't say the "greatest DL"...
    I said the "last great DL".
    Is there a DL since '93 that you would consider better than '93?
    I also wasn't talking to you.

    Mike
    You are absolutely right, Mike.

    My bad.
    :'(
    [size=12pt]
    Page 148.5 **Doleman 150.5 **Randle 137.5 **Allen 73+
    [/size]

  3. #13
    Mikecarter81's Avatar
    Mikecarter81 is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    823

    Re: Vikings 2008 vs 1993 sack attack

    no problem

    Mike
    I am an avid Viking fan, but also am an avid restoration guy of vintage Mopar(Chrysler, Dodge, Plymouth)B bodies

  4. #14
    Zeus's Avatar
    Zeus is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Minnesota.
    Posts
    23,937

    Re: Vikings 2008 vs 1993 sack attack

    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    1989 was the measuring stick for our defense in terms of sacks. The team had a total of 71 sacks and the following were some of the individual efforts:

    Doleman- 21
    millard- 18
    Noga- 11.5
    Thomas-9
    (That equals 59.5 for the d-line)

    Merriweather-3.5
    Studwell-1
    Berry-3
    Clarke-2.5
    Browner-1
    Strauthers-1



    that was a defense built on extreme pressure. The thing that held the team back was the offense and Burnsies WCO style. I hope to got history doesn't repeat itself ;D
    Purpurroter Jesus hat Gott auf der Seite der Wikinger.

    =Z=

    Thanks to Josdin for the awesome sig!

  5. #15
    Purple Floyd's Avatar
    Purple Floyd is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    16,646
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Vikings 2008 vs 1993 sack attack

    "Zeus" wrote:
    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    1989 was the measuring stick for our defense in terms of sacks. The team had a total of 71 sacks and the following were some of the individual efforts:

    Doleman- 21
    millard- 18
    Noga- 11.5
    Thomas-9
    (That equals 59.5 for the d-line)

    Merriweather-3.5
    Studwell-1
    Berry-3
    Clarke-2.5
    Browner-1
    Strauthers-1



    that was a defense built on extreme pressure. The thing that held the team back was the offense and Burnsies WCO style. I hope to got history doesn't repeat itself ;D
    Purpurroter Jesus hat Gott auf der Seite der Wikinger.

    =Z=
    Was sagen sie bitte? Das kann ich nicht verstehen

  6. #16
    Zeus's Avatar
    Zeus is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Minnesota.
    Posts
    23,937

    Re: Vikings 2008 vs 1993 sack attack

    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    "Zeus" wrote:
    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    1989 was the measuring stick for our defense in terms of sacks. The team had a total of 71 sacks and the following were some of the individual efforts:

    Doleman- 21
    millard- 18
    Noga- 11.5
    Thomas-9
    (That equals 59.5 for the d-line)

    Merriweather-3.5
    Studwell-1
    Berry-3
    Clarke-2.5
    Browner-1
    Strauthers-1



    that was a defense built on extreme pressure. The thing that held the team back was the offense and Burnsies WCO style. I hope to got history doesn't repeat itself ;D
    Purpurroter Jesus hat Gott auf der Seite der Wikinger.
    Was sagen sie bitte? Das kann ich nicht verstehen
    Sie sollten zu Babelfish auch gehen und es für Sie übersetzen lassen! Ich tat, mein Freund!

    Thanks to Josdin for the awesome sig!

  7. #17
    Purple Floyd's Avatar
    Purple Floyd is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    16,646
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Vikings 2008 vs 1993 sack attack

    "Zeus" wrote:
    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    "Zeus" wrote:
    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    1989 was the measuring stick for our defense in terms of sacks. The team had a total of 71 sacks and the following were some of the individual efforts:

    Doleman- 21
    millard- 18
    Noga- 11.5
    Thomas-9
    (That equals 59.5 for the d-line)

    Merriweather-3.5
    Studwell-1
    Berry-3
    Clarke-2.5
    Browner-1
    Strauthers-1



    that was a defense built on extreme pressure. The thing that held the team back was the offense and Burnsies WCO style. I hope to got history doesn't repeat itself ;D
    Purpurroter Jesus hat Gott auf der Seite der Wikinger.
    Was sagen sie bitte? Das kann ich nicht verstehen
    Sie sollten zu Babelfish auch gehen und es für Sie übersetzen lassen! Ich tat, mein Freund!
    du bist crackin mir up Mein freund. ;D

    Das ist richtig

  8. #18
    dcboardr41 is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,051

    Re: Vikings 2008 vs 1993 sack attack

    i think the DLine can get close to 40

    Allen- 14
    KWill-9
    Pat- 6
    Edwards-10

    39 is close enough for me lol

    Pissing on the Pack since 08'

  9. #19
    Purple Floyd's Avatar
    Purple Floyd is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    16,646
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Vikings 2008 vs 1993 sack attack

    50+

  10. #20
    vikingivan is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,993

    Re: Vikings 2008 vs 1993 sack attack

    "Mikecarter81" wrote:
    opps I as off a year!
    Thanks for the correction.
    :-[

    mike
    A year off, but a great point Mike.
    That line was awesome.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Vikings drafts since 1993 – a retrospective
    By Marrdro in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-20-2009, 08:43 AM
  2. Replies: 25
    Last Post: 08-20-2008, 03:03 PM
  3. Jared Allen predicted to be NFL sack leader in 2008
    By cajunvike in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 08-18-2008, 07:15 PM
  4. Grading #1 Picks since 1993
    By ejmat in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 06-23-2006, 09:02 PM
  5. Vikings' sack race isn't over
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 12-30-2005, 11:25 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •