Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 35
  1. #21
    marshallvike's Avatar
    marshallvike is online now Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Naperville, IL
    Posts
    2,471

    Re: Vikes lose to Skins

    Quote Originally Posted by "Zeus" #1080256
    Quote Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1080248
    Just think if we connected on a few of those deeper balls. that 299 yards could be 400+ yards easily. If Peterson didn't get hurt, our run game probably does even better.
    You should know me well enough at this point to know that I don't play the "if" game.

    =Z=

    If ifs and buts were candy and nuts, wed all have a merry Christmas
    Dandy Don
    Why must you defend everything this FO does....to the point of making your self look like a yes man.

  2. #22
    i_bleed_purple's Avatar
    i_bleed_purple is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canadialand
    Posts
    16,777
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Vikes lose to Skins

    Quote Originally Posted by "Zeus" #1080256
    Quote Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1080248
    Just think if we connected on a few of those deeper balls. that 299 yards could be 400+ yards easily. If Peterson didn't get hurt, our run game probably does even better.
    You should know me well enough at this point to know that I don't play the "if" game.

    =Z=
    my point still stands. I think he did a great job playcalling. What do you want him to do, call all deep routes?

    TG isn't the kind of guy to break of big gains like Peterson. He pounds it between the tackles, and occasionally might hit the second level. He had an alright day. Not fantastic, but solid. Peterson was already at 70 yards in the second quarter. That hurt our performance.

    Some missed plays due to poor execution, and good plays by the D, but all in all, I liked the playcalling. I thought it was almost too much play action, but it seemed to work quite well.

  3. #23
    Zeus's Avatar
    Zeus is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Minnesota.
    Posts
    23,937

    Re: Vikes lose to Skins

    Quote Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1080259
    Quote Originally Posted by "Zeus" #1080256
    Quote Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1080248
    Just think if we connected on a few of those deeper balls. that 299 yards could be 400+ yards easily. If Peterson didn't get hurt, our run game probably does even better.
    You should know me well enough at this point to know that I don't play the "if" game.
    my point still stands. I think he did a great job playcalling. What do you want him to do, call all deep routes?

    TG isn't the kind of guy to break of big gains like Peterson. He pounds it between the tackles, and occasionally might hit the second level. He had an alright day. Not fantastic, but solid. Peterson was already at 70 yards in the second quarter. That hurt our performance.

    Some missed plays due to poor execution, and good plays by the D, but all in all, I liked the playcalling. I thought it was almost too much play action, but it seemed to work quite well.
    And I, personally, didn't have a lot of problems with the play-calling when Childress was in charge. I had problems with the execution.

    =Z=

    Thanks to Josdin for the awesome sig!

  4. #24
    i_bleed_purple's Avatar
    i_bleed_purple is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canadialand
    Posts
    16,777
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Vikes lose to Skins

    Quote Originally Posted by "Zeus" #1080262
    Quote Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1080259
    Quote Originally Posted by "Zeus" #1080256
    Quote Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1080248
    Just think if we connected on a few of those deeper balls. that 299 yards could be 400+ yards easily. If Peterson didn't get hurt, our run game probably does even better.
    You should know me well enough at this point to know that I don't play the "if" game.
    my point still stands. I think he did a great job playcalling. What do you want him to do, call all deep routes?

    TG isn't the kind of guy to break of big gains like Peterson. He pounds it between the tackles, and occasionally might hit the second level. He had an alright day. Not fantastic, but solid. Peterson was already at 70 yards in the second quarter. That hurt our performance.

    Some missed plays due to poor execution, and good plays by the D, but all in all, I liked the playcalling. I thought it was almost too much play action, but it seemed to work quite well.
    And I, personally, didn't have a lot of problems with the play-calling when Childress was in charge. I had problems with the execution.

    =Z=
    There are only so many times we can bring the draw on third and long.

    And did you notice, when you throw to AP in the flats, he can usually make something out of it? we didn't really do that much at all. Play action was very effective yesterday, but strangely absent from our playcalling previously.

  5. #25
    marstc09's Avatar
    marstc09 is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    23,179

    Re: Vikes lose to Skins

    Quote Originally Posted by "Zeus" #1080230
    Quote Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1080083
    Quote Originally Posted by "marstc09" #1080079
    Quote Originally Posted by "singersp" #1079992
    Quote Originally Posted by "Webby" #1079983
    If the Vikes lose to the Skins, then where do you stand?

    Coach or the players causing the issues?

    Or too early for referendum on Frazier (I am not expecting much, but maybe a spark with new leader)
    As I stated before Childress may be gone, but his buddies, some of which shouldn't be coaching at the pro level, are still there.
    His buddies look fine to me. Chilly was the cancer.
    still remainst o be seen, but I think Bevell did a great job calling the O. Funny how that changes when Chilly isn't sitting there meddling.
    299 total net yards is a "great job calling the O"?

    Amazing how nice everything appears to be when your ancient QB isn't tossing the ball to the other team.

    =Z=
    LMFAO!

    Amazing how that "ancient" QB does not make mistakes when you use him properly by concentrating on the bootleg. Maybe if Chilly actually listened to his players instead of being a self absorbed prick he would still be coaching.

  6. #26
    marstc09's Avatar
    marstc09 is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    23,179

    Re: Vikes lose to Skins

    Quote Originally Posted by "Zeus" #1080262
    Quote Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1080259
    Quote Originally Posted by "Zeus" #1080256
    Quote Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1080248
    Just think if we connected on a few of those deeper balls. that 299 yards could be 400+ yards easily. If Peterson didn't get hurt, our run game probably does even better.
    You should know me well enough at this point to know that I don't play the "if" game.
    my point still stands. I think he did a great job playcalling. What do you want him to do, call all deep routes?

    TG isn't the kind of guy to break of big gains like Peterson. He pounds it between the tackles, and occasionally might hit the second level. He had an alright day. Not fantastic, but solid. Peterson was already at 70 yards in the second quarter. That hurt our performance.

    Some missed plays due to poor execution, and good plays by the D, but all in all, I liked the playcalling. I thought it was almost too much play action, but it seemed to work quite well.
    And I, personally, didn't have a lot of problems with the play-calling when Childress was in charge. I had problems with the execution.

    =Z=
    Judging by what happened Sunday, that Chilly play calling might have led to poor execution.

  7. #27
    Zeus's Avatar
    Zeus is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Minnesota.
    Posts
    23,937

    Re: Vikes lose to Skins

    Quote Originally Posted by "marstc09" #1080289
    Quote Originally Posted by "Zeus" #1080262
    Quote Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1080259
    Quote Originally Posted by "Zeus" #1080256
    Quote Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1080248
    Just think if we connected on a few of those deeper balls. that 299 yards could be 400+ yards easily. If Peterson didn't get hurt, our run game probably does even better.
    You should know me well enough at this point to know that I don't play the "if" game.
    my point still stands. I think he did a great job playcalling. What do you want him to do, call all deep routes?

    TG isn't the kind of guy to break of big gains like Peterson. He pounds it between the tackles, and occasionally might hit the second level. He had an alright day. Not fantastic, but solid. Peterson was already at 70 yards in the second quarter. That hurt our performance.

    Some missed plays due to poor execution, and good plays by the D, but all in all, I liked the playcalling. I thought it was almost too much play action, but it seemed to work quite well.
    And I, personally, didn't have a lot of problems with the play-calling when Childress was in charge. I had problems with the execution.
    Judging by what happened Sunday, that Chilly play calling might have led to poor execution.
    I am amazed that you can look at the paltry offensive output from yesterday (299 total yards, 6 for 15 on 3rd down) and think it was some great advance over what occurred when Childress was here.

    =Z=

    Thanks to Josdin for the awesome sig!

  8. #28
    marstc09's Avatar
    marstc09 is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    23,179

    Re: Vikes lose to Skins

    Quote Originally Posted by "Zeus" #1080293
    Quote Originally Posted by "marstc09" #1080289
    Quote Originally Posted by "Zeus" #1080262
    Quote Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1080259
    Quote Originally Posted by "Zeus" #1080256
    Quote Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1080248
    Just think if we connected on a few of those deeper balls. that 299 yards could be 400+ yards easily. If Peterson didn't get hurt, our run game probably does even better.
    You should know me well enough at this point to know that I don't play the "if" game.
    my point still stands. I think he did a great job playcalling. What do you want him to do, call all deep routes?

    TG isn't the kind of guy to break of big gains like Peterson. He pounds it between the tackles, and occasionally might hit the second level. He had an alright day. Not fantastic, but solid. Peterson was already at 70 yards in the second quarter. That hurt our performance.

    Some missed plays due to poor execution, and good plays by the D, but all in all, I liked the playcalling. I thought it was almost too much play action, but it seemed to work quite well.
    And I, personally, didn't have a lot of problems with the play-calling when Childress was in charge. I had problems with the execution.
    Judging by what happened Sunday, that Chilly play calling might have led to poor execution.
    I am amazed that you can look at the paltry offensive output from yesterday (299 total yards, 6 for 15 on 3rd down) and think it was some great advance over what occurred when Childress was here.

    =Z=
    I am amazed that you expect perfection after 3 days of practice. Just plain silly. Also, when did I use "great advance"? Please show me oh great one. All I said was that he is off to a great start.

  9. #29
    Zeus's Avatar
    Zeus is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Minnesota.
    Posts
    23,937

    Re: Vikes lose to Skins

    Quote Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1080271
    Quote Originally Posted by "Zeus" #1080262
    Quote Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1080259
    Quote Originally Posted by "Zeus" #1080256
    Quote Originally Posted by "i_bleed_purple" #1080248
    Just think if we connected on a few of those deeper balls. that 299 yards could be 400+ yards easily. If Peterson didn't get hurt, our run game probably does even better.
    You should know me well enough at this point to know that I don't play the "if" game.
    my point still stands. I think he did a great job playcalling. What do you want him to do, call all deep routes?

    TG isn't the kind of guy to break of big gains like Peterson. He pounds it between the tackles, and occasionally might hit the second level. He had an alright day. Not fantastic, but solid. Peterson was already at 70 yards in the second quarter. That hurt our performance.

    Some missed plays due to poor execution, and good plays by the D, but all in all, I liked the playcalling. I thought it was almost too much play action, but it seemed to work quite well.
    And I, personally, didn't have a lot of problems with the play-calling when Childress was in charge. I had problems with the execution.
    There are only so many times we can bring the draw on third and long.
    Like this play from yesterday, right?

    http://www.nfl.com/gamecenter/2010112803/2010/REG12/vikings@redskins#tab:analyze/analyze-channels:cat-post-playbyplay

    3-10-MIN 25 (1:08) (Shotgun) 32-T.Gerhart right tackle to MIN 30 for 5 yards (41-K.Moore; 59-L.Fletcher).

    And how about those handoffs to Jeff Dugan! Damn, that was some EXCITING play-calling!

    =Z=

    Thanks to Josdin for the awesome sig!

  10. #30
    Infidel is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    1,947

    Re: Vikes lose to Skins

    And I, personally, didn't have a lot of problems with the play-calling when Childress was in charge. I had problems with the execution.
    I have to laugh.

    Childress constantly called stupid plays.

    Would Childress have allowed Favre to run the naked bootleg yesterday and ice the game?

    No......Childress was far too much of an insecure ass to allow Favre to shine like that.

    But then if Childress had been calling the plays we wouldn't have been in any position to ice the game.

    We would have been playing catch-up.
    It's what you learn after you know it all that counts.
    --John Wooden

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Won a bet on the Vikes/Skins game...
    By Vikestand in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-30-2010, 01:06 AM
  2. Official Vikes vs. Skins in DC Thread
    By NeumDog in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 05-19-2006, 03:36 AM
  3. More Vikes vs. Skins Pics....Enjoy!
    By enlvikeman in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-16-2005, 10:58 AM
  4. More Vikes vs. Skins Pics....Enjoy!
    By enlvikeman in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 05-08-2005, 11:50 AM
  5. glad the vikes are playing the skins....
    By viking hope in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-30-2004, 02:36 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •