-
06-05-2008, 04:18 PM #1
Waterboy
- Join Date
- Sep 2006
- Posts
- 6
Vikes, Bears, Packers & Lions Website Stats
http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/worldwidetelescope.org?site0=vikings.com&site1=chi cagobears.com&site2=packers.com&site3=detroitlions .com&y=r&z=3&h=400&w=700&c=1&u%5B%5D=vikings.com&u %5B%5D=chicagobears.com&u%5B%5D=packers.com&u%5B%5 D=detroitlions.com&x=2008-06-05T21%3A17%3A34.000Z&check=www.alexa.com&signature =zE7JshWNK%2BhzuVUOgZu1QyKR7xA%3D&range=3m&size=La rge]Click!
Found this site in my bookmarks - thought this was interesting.
You can see the packer hike in March with Favre's retirement announcement, as well as the ratio'd surge during the draft.
Sucks to see that the vikings site is about deadlocked with the Lions.
EDIT: Sorry for the long link, couldn't get the url tags or the image tag to work.
-
Re: Vikes, Bears, Packers & Lions Website Stats
Its because PPO steals all the Vikings hits

----
PUT IN JACKSON!
-
06-05-2008, 04:40 PM #3
Team Alumni
- Join Date
- Jan 2008
- Posts
- 3,051
Re: Vikes, Bears, Packers & Lions Website Stats
maybe its because vikings.com sucks ass

Pissing on the Pack since 08'
-
06-05-2008, 09:19 PM #4
Re: Vikes, Bears, Packers & Lions Website Stats
"dcboardr41" wrote:
Exactly vikings.com is by far the worst of all of the nfl.com sites Damn iggy throw some mony at Webby so he can make your site bettermaybe its because vikings.com sucks ass
-
06-05-2008, 09:28 PM #5
Re: Vikes, Bears, Packers & Lions Website Stats
There is only one Vikings site. PP.O!

-
06-05-2008, 09:40 PM #6
Re: Vikes, Bears, Packers & Lions Website Stats
"Garland" wrote:
I can't stand when people think PP.O should be the offical site."dcboardr41" wrote:
Exactly vikings.com is by far the worst of all of the nfl.com sites gol 'darnit iggy throw some mony at Webby so he can make your site bettermaybe its because vikings.com sucks jiggly butt
It's crazy!
Do you think an offical NFL site would have a 'Packers Suck" section?
Do you think a Viking's offical site would have criticism of the Vikings?
The things that make PP.O good are the things that make it a bad offical team site.Make love to the present, fuck the past
--Sage Francis
-
06-05-2008, 09:44 PM #7
Re: Vikes, Bears, Packers & Lions Website Stats
"Eyedea" wrote:
If you can't stand the site then why are you here?"Garland" wrote:
I can't stand when people think PP.O should be the offical site."dcboardr41" wrote:
Exactly vikings.com is by far the worst of all of the nfl.com sites gol 'darnit iggy throw some mony at Webby so he can make your site bettermaybe its because vikings.com sucks jiggly butt
It's crazy!
Do you think an offical NFL site would have a 'Packers Suck" section?
Do you think a Viking's offical site would have criticism of the Vikings?
The things that make PP.O good are the things that make it a bad offical team site.
Nobody said anything about making PPO the official site.
-
06-05-2008, 10:00 PM #8
Re: Vikes, Bears, Packers & Lions Website Stats
"Garland" wrote:
Exactly! This is about fan site "hits". If PP.O was listed on that chart, it would rank higher than all the rest. At many times during the day we have over 100 people on line just lurking & our membership is always increasing."Eyedea" wrote:
If you can't stand the site then why are you here?"Garland" wrote:
I can't stand when people think PP.O should be the offical site."dcboardr41" wrote:
Exactly vikings.com is by far the worst of all of the nfl.com sites gol 'darnit iggy throw some mony at Webby so he can make your site bettermaybe its because vikings.com sucks jiggly butt
It's crazy!
Do you think an offical NFL site would have a 'Packers Suck" section?
Do you think a Viking's offical site would have criticism of the Vikings?
The things that make PP.O good are the things that make it a bad offical team site.
Nobody said anything about making PPO the official site.
There's a reason over 8,000 members have joined this site over other Vikings fan sites.
How can Vikings.com take a shitload of hits when people are coming here to find the latest news?
"If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"
-
06-05-2008, 10:10 PM #9
Re: Vikes, Bears, Packers & Lions Website Stats
"Eyedea" wrote:
Every site should have a Packers Suck section!"Garland" wrote:
I can't stand when people think PP.O should be the offical site."dcboardr41" wrote:
Exactly vikings.com is by far the worst of all of the nfl.com sites gol 'darnit iggy throw some mony at Webby so he can make your site bettermaybe its because vikings.com sucks jiggly butt
It's crazy!
Do you think an offical NFL site would have a 'Packers Suck" section?
Do you think a Viking's offical site would have criticism of the Vikings?
The things that make PP.O good are the things that make it a bad offical team site.
8) Also you spelled official wrong 4 times. Just thought I would add that.

-
06-05-2008, 10:53 PM #10
Re: Vikes, Bears, Packers & Lions Website Stats
vikings.com just needs easier access to more cheerleader pictures and it will be better
We're bringing purple back.
Similar Threads
-
Official Favre, Vikes, Bears, Trade, Packers deserve to Lose thread
By singersp in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 1346Last Post: 08-08-2008, 07:16 AM -
Packers Blow Website
By WBLVikeBabe in forum The ClubhouseReplies: 15Last Post: 05-07-2006, 09:47 PM -
Vikes / Lions game stats
By XTAP59 in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 9Last Post: 11-21-2004, 07:15 PM -
Packers website Time 4!!!
By purpleFavreEaters in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 2Last Post: 10-11-2004, 07:23 PM -
Other than the vikes website which is the best in the north
By vikingsalltheway in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 7Last Post: 10-02-2004, 11:45 PM


Reply With Quote






Bookmarks