02-17-2014, 04:25 PM #11
I've been watching "Hey Rookie, welcome to the NFL 2011" were Freeman was featured throwing to Mike Williams, and I really liked what I saw. He is the only vet this season who COULD be a star QB, in my opinion. Why not roll 2 dice, instead of a dead-end vet and a possible future QB?Men are moved by two levers only: fear and self interest.
02-17-2014, 04:52 PM #12
02-17-2014, 05:14 PM #13
Freeman wanted a fresh start in Minnesota, and I think we owe him that much, considering what the team felt we owed Ponder. Freeman has the skill, that doesn't magically disappear; he lost the work ethic in Tampa, let's see if he can find it again for us.Men are moved by two levers only: fear and self interest.
02-17-2014, 05:19 PM #14Coordinator
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
I don't care either way since he isn't the long term answer. I just don't want to see Ponder. Spielman needs to admit his mistake and move on.
02-17-2014, 05:24 PM #15
I would not have a problem with Cassel and think that Norv could convince him to come back under the new regime if he is going to be the starter.
Thing is ... Ponder is the backup almost for sure because of money. I guess he could be the No. 3 depending on who we get in the draft. But I would be more than happy with Cassel as the guy if Norv is good with it. Cassel, Ponder and a draft pick is the way to go if we can get someone we like in the second or third round.
02-17-2014, 06:27 PM #16
02-17-2014, 06:56 PM #17
The QB I would like to be brought in are eitherof the 2 between Fales and Murray. I love both of these guys and think 3rd round for Fales and probably 5th for Murray. But outside of Carr I don't care for the top QBs as franchise guys. Ponder will not be the stater here again
02-17-2014, 08:18 PM #18
My second choice after Manziel, again I know that isn't going to happen is McCarron. Don't ask me to explain I can't really. It's just that after watching him I think he's another that could be really good.