We're obviously gonna be using him to run a lot of deep routes, but I hope we run a lot of bubble screens to him also, because he is extremely good and dangerous when he runs them.
Ok, negative. :lol:
I really, really hope he's good, and I'm looking forward to seeing him play. But I still don't understand the pick. I guess that's why they're the professionals though!
I was as vocal as anybody on this site that we should have taken mike williams instead, but I do understand why we took williamson. Williams and williamson are different type of players, and the coaches(not me) wanted a speedster at WR, instead of the more possession type of receiver. And williamson, much like kevin williams a few years ago, was one of the fastest rising players in the draft and would have gone to washington at 9, if we didn't take him, so apparently we weren't the only team high on him.
I will not bash/doubt williamson though, because I wanted mike williams instead.