Thread: Trade for Romo?
How about Philip Rivers instead?
12-26-2013, 12:24 PM #13Rookie
- Join Date
- Oct 2013
- The Jersey Shore, Twitter - @pinfante97
12-27-2013, 08:43 AM #14
"If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"
12-27-2013, 11:47 AM #15
I wouldn't mind Romo or Rivers. The problem with Romo is he has too much power over what is run. He comes out and run passing plays when the team should be running the ball. He wouldn't have that problem in Minn with AP and the weather. However, the contracts he hold is impossible. I say it all the time. No one player is worth over 15 million. I would give 15 million only to the Brady's and Mannings. Not a Penny more. Everyone else can walk. You are killing your team by giving out more than that.
12-27-2013, 01:04 PM #17
12-27-2013, 04:02 PM #18
Not worth discussing since there's no way they would ever let go of Romo. Obviously if he was available it would be a good idea to trade whatever it takes to get him. He's probably the most underrated player in the history of the NFL.
12-28-2013, 03:37 PM #19
12-29-2013, 09:36 PM #20
Surprised at all the anti-Romo talk. I know he's almost certainly staying in Dallas so it doesn't matter but how often have the Vikings had a QB better than him???? Favre in '09....who made the type of mistake Tony Romo is known for to end the season and everybody loved him.Skol Vikings! Go Cubs!
X MARKS THE SPOT