Thread: Too Many RBs? Questions at several positions

[size=13pt]Too Many RBs?[/size]


By Viking Update Staff

Posted May 28, 2007

This guy asked a bunch of questions that we had already thought about, but he doesn't really try to answer anything.

How about asking Too Many Safeties?

It's just another one of these articles that tries to occupy us while we wait for Training Camp to start.

Until we can get some field action, we're just discussion empty statements. It's getting sickening.

The answers will come, starting in September

This article brings to mind something I've been wanting to see for years...from the two back set, Peterson, or Moore, or Taylor for that matter, goes in motion, taking an outside WR spot...if the coverage is slow to move over, quick out to the RB, who should be looking 1 on 1 with a safety to beat
If they roll too much coverage that way, you can rush the other guy or perhaps throw a screen to the other side...

As far as I know, that is legal motion...?
anybody know otherwise??

Safety seems like a better question to me too...I wonder if any of those guys are tradable?
Then again, some of them might excell on ST and/or play some CB too...?

"mountainviking" wrote:

The answers will come, starting in September

This article brings to mind something I've been wanting to see for years...from the two back set, Peterson, or Moore, or Taylor for that matter, goes in motion, taking an outside WR spot...if the coverage is slow to move over, quick out to the RB, who should be looking 1 on 1 with a safety to beat
If they roll too much coverage that way, you can rush the other guy or perhaps throw a screen to the other side...

As far as I know, that is legal motion...?
anybody know otherwise??

Safety seems like a better question to me too...I wonder if any of those guys are tradable?
Then again, some of them might excell on ST and/or play some CB too...?

Mismatches, that is what you would be trying to create.

If you watched some of the Saints game last year, they did it all the time with Bush. Actually coaches looks for their offenses to create mismatches all the time.

BOBBY WADE OUR NUMBER 1 WR!! OMG WHAT HAS THE WORLD COME TO!! HE IS A #4 WR WITH THE TITANS!! THE TITANS.... im having a heart attack,, im ok wit rice at 2

"SharperImage" wrote:

BOBBY WADE OUR NUMBER 1 WR!! OMG WHAT HAS THE WORLD COME TO!! HE IS A #4 WR WITH THE TITANS!! THE TITANS.... im having a heart attack,, im ok wit rice at 2

Relax. It's all out of loose statements from Chilly, and I think mostly Bevell that they expect things from him.

He'll play the slot receiver spot that were vacated by TT that played there most. If TWill steps it up, my take is that he'll start the first game along with Rice.

But we'll see what happens when they get to TC.

"SharperImage" wrote:

BOBBY WADE OUR NUMBER 1 WR!! OMG WHAT HAS THE WORLD COME TO!! HE IS A #4 WR WITH THE TITANS!! THE TITANS.... im having a heart attack,, im ok wit rice at 2

He was actually Young's go-to reciever for most of the year.
His stats were 2nd in every catagory behind Bennet however.

I see no problem at running back Chester will be the starter like last year and will split carries with Adrian and MeMo will be the 3rd down receiver and Fason, Pinner are going to have to battle for a spot on the team and for some carries.

"cogitans" wrote:

How about asking Too Many Safeties?

It's just another one of these articles that tries to occupy us while we wait for Training Camp to start.

Until we can get some field action, we're just discussion empty statements. It's getting sickening.

Party pooper!!!
>