Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18
  1. #11
    i_bleed_purple's Avatar
    i_bleed_purple is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canadialand
    Posts
    16,777
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Tony Richardson - Great for the vikes

    mine is set as unicode UTF-8 and it still looks messed up

  2. #12
    Zeus's Avatar
    Zeus is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Minnesota.
    Posts
    23,937

    Re: Tony Richardson - Great for the vikes

    "i_bleed_purple" wrote:
    mine is set as unicode UTF-8 and it still looks messed up
    Don't quote me on this - but I think the problem is HIS encoding. When he made the post, I would guess he tried to put a ' there for the post and his encoding option turned that into the funky code we see.

    Just a guess...

    =Z=

    Thanks to Josdin for the awesome sig!

  3. #13
    cajunvike's Avatar
    cajunvike is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    32,063

    Re: Tony Richardson - Great for the vikes

    "i_bleed_purple" wrote:
    mine is set as unicode UTF-8 and it still looks messed up
    It does that in the Shout Block too!
    BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE

  4. #14
    PurplePeopleEaters's Avatar
    PurplePeopleEaters is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,901

    Re: Tony Richardson - Great for the vikes

    "cajunvike" wrote:
    "i_bleed_purple" wrote:
    mine is set as unicode UTF-8 and it still looks messed up
    It does that in the Shout Block too!
    It's because of apostrophe's.

  5. #15
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,266

    Re: Tony Richardson - Great for the vikes

    "COJOMAY" wrote:
    Question:
    So if Richardson is blocking for Taylor where does that leave Kleinsauser? Is he still a blocker of linebackers or is he a possible receiver?
    I believe they will still use Jimmy K. in both the TE & blocking roles.

    With Richardson in there, chances are he will be blocking for a RB.

    With Jimmy in their he could be pass blocking, blocking for a RB or going out for a pass.

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  6. #16
    PurplePeopleEaters's Avatar
    PurplePeopleEaters is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,901

    Re: Tony Richardson - Great for the vikes

    "singersp" wrote:
    "COJOMAY" wrote:
    Question:
    So if Richardson is blocking for Taylor where does that leave Kleinsauser? Is he still a blocker of linebackers or is he a possible receiver?
    I believe they will still use Jimmy K. in both the TE & blocking roles.

    With Richardson in there, chances are he will be blocking for a RB.

    With Jimmy in their he could be pass blocking, blocking for a RB or going out for a pass.
    Yeah I think Jimmy will be used in a backup tight end role. He will come in as a solid option when we don't need wiggy in there. No need to keep him at fullback.

  7. #17
    digital420's Avatar
    digital420 is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Ancient Korinthia
    Posts
    2,548

    Re: Tony Richardson - Great for the vikes

    "PurplePeopleEaters" wrote:
    "cajunvike" wrote:
    "i_bleed_purple" wrote:
    mine is set as unicode UTF-8 and it still looks messed up
    It does that in the Shout Block too!
    It's because of apostrophe's.
    it's the browsers interpetation of a code chunk.

    © is .&.c.o.p.y.;. wihtout the .'s it's hexcode replacement for 1 character. i either the browser didn't render it. or the encoder put it wrong.

    DiGiTaL

    "We tried to stick with it, but there was a point where we were beating our head against a wall," Seattle Coach Mora talking about running at the Williams Wall

  8. #18
    digital420's Avatar
    digital420 is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Ancient Korinthia
    Posts
    2,548

    Re: Tony Richardson - Great for the vikes

    "PurplePeopleEaters" wrote:
    "singersp" wrote:
    "COJOMAY" wrote:
    Question:
    So if Richardson is blocking for Taylor where does that leave Kleinsauser? Is he still a blocker of linebackers or is he a possible receiver?
    I believe they will still use Jimmy K. in both the TE & blocking roles.

    With Richardson in there, chances are he will be blocking for a RB.

    With Jimmy in their he could be pass blocking, blocking for a RB or going out for a pass.
    Yeah I think Jimmy will be used in a backup tight end role. He will come in as a solid option when we don't need wiggy in there. No need to keep him at fullback.
    I think we'll see lots of combinations.

    J.k and T.r will be mainly in there for full running, and T.w tossed in for pass - play actions.. if they get really smart about it some sneaky playes to J.k or T.r will suprise the hell outta D's. and if we get them overly commited to the run.. check it to T.w!!!

    DiGiTaL

    "We tried to stick with it, but there was a point where we were beating our head against a wall," Seattle Coach Mora talking about running at the Williams Wall

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Threads

  1. Q & A with Tony Richardson
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-10-2008, 07:58 AM
  2. One on one with fullback Tony Richardson
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-10-2006, 09:51 AM
  3. Tony Richardson is Moon’s man
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-05-2006, 02:11 PM
  4. One-on-One With Tony Richardson
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 06-06-2006, 10:29 AM
  5. Vikes visit with Tony Richardson
    By audioghost in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 03-21-2006, 09:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •