Time to pull a Washington...

**cajunvike** · 11-19-2006, 04:53 PM

and see what TJ can do!

Stepping in and providing a spark to our offense might just boost his confidence and he just might win us a few games....can't hurt!

**Mr. Purple** · 11-19-2006, 04:58 PM

I agree.I've tried to be patient with Brad Johnson, but he just isnt the right QB for this team right now.Our team is nowhere near superbowl status yet.Questionable receving corps, shakey right side of the O-Line.I could go on and on, but the point is I'd like to see what TJ can do.Its not going to hurt, it can really only make us better.Now dont get me wrong, he could step in and do an even worse job then Brad, but at this point does it matter?The NFC is weak and some 8-8 teams could slide into the playoffs, but can you see this team you saw today winning more then one playoff game? I cant.Put in TJ Childress.

**MetalMike-LoudVike** · 11-19-2006, 05:02 PM

damn right we more than likely are out of playoff contention. huuummmm.... lets look to the future and see what this guys got but he will be much more mobile than brad is. why not give the guy a chance

**Webby** · 11-19-2006, 05:48 PM

So could Brooks.
HA!
I love the singlemindedness!
:P :P

**CCthebest** · 11-19-2006, 05:55 PM

Its time for Brooks, not TJ. If TJ is fully healthy, maybe he can play the last 2 games. Bench Grandpa Johnson and give him a cusion for the benchwarming.

**PurplePeopleEaters** · 11-19-2006, 06:01 PM

I agree. Whether it's brooks or Tarvaris we need a change at QB. I'm really eager to see Tarvaris for the future of this team and since the season is pretty much over why not?

And think about it. What better time to throw in Tarvaris or Brooks then against the worst team in the NFL? It will be half as embarrassing if our newly started QB loses the game against them. C'mon Childress.. it's time for a change.

**cajunvike** · 11-19-2006, 06:17 PM

"Webby" wrote:

So could Brooks.
HA!
I love the singlemindedness!

:P :P

But do we really care how well Brooks plays?
I know that I don't!

**ultravikingfan** · 11-19-2006, 06:21 PM

"cajunvike" wrote:

"Webby" wrote:

So could Brooks.
HA!
I love the singlemindedness!

:P :P

But do we really care how well Brooks plays?
I know that I don't!

But we do not know how Jackson plays.
Either way, it's a gamble.
I heard he has not healed completely.

**BadlandsVikings** · 11-19-2006, 06:24 PM

"cajunvike" wrote:

"Webby" wrote:

So could Brooks.
HA!
I love the singlemindedness!

:P :P

But do we really care how well Brooks plays?
I know that I don't!

I'm sure you would if he was taking the snaps.

**PurplePeopleEaters** · 11-19-2006, 06:28 PM

"ultravikingfan" wrote:

"cajunvike" wrote:

"Webby" wrote:

So could Brooks.
HA!
I love the singlemindedness!
:P :P

But do we really care how well Brooks plays?
I know that I don't!

But we do not know how Jackson plays.
Either way, it's a gamble.
I heard he has not healed completely.

It's not a gamble if we have nothing to lose. If he's not fully healed he won't play but I think the fact that he's been active shows that he is healthy right?