Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 31
  1. #1
    moviking's Avatar
    moviking is offline Training Camp
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    38

    Time for a HOF rant - Viking Slighted

    Hi and thanks for allowing me to participate here at purple pride.

    Today folks and sports fans, I want to discuss the HOF inductees of 07.

    Been doing some surfing since the Super Bowl ended. I mean after all, the game should have been a complete blow out and NO, Peyton Manning wasnt the MVP in my opinion. IMHO, the figured they better feed this guy a Super Bowl MVP in case he never gets back so he is HOF worthy!

    There in lies my rant for the evening....the Hall of Fame. There were some very worthy members inducted this year, and a couple that leave me scratching my damn head! I have no problem with Bruce Matthews, Roger Wherli and Thurman Thomas(even though he forgot his helmet in a pretty big game).
    My problem lies mainly in the other 3 selections. Oh and while Bruce Matthews is qualified....what about our boy Randall McDaniel? 12 consecutive pro bowls, 5 years ALL-PRO!! Doesnt that count?

    Gene Hickerson instead of ohhhh say maybe Jim Marshall???
    While Hickerson might have been a mighty fine guard playing in front of Jim Brown.....he played in front of...yes, the aforementioned Jim Brown that could probably make an average college offensive line look good!
    Jim Marshall folks.....281 consecutive games at a very physical position while playing at a very high level! 3 Pro Bowls folks. Did Jim piss in someone's Cheerios way back when?

    Charlie Sanders....hmmmmm I had to look up Charlie Sanders to even know who the hell he was. Apparently he was a pretty good TE, buuttttt.......
    compare him to some other guys from the same era....why Charlie Sanders?
    He was never in the top ten in any category, not in the top 50 of any category.
    Here's a list of stats of him vs someone you never heard of either and a couple you might have.
    Charlie Sanders
    68-77 336 recpt/4817 yds/31 TD/14.3 per catch
    Jerome Barkum (Jets)
    72-83 326/4789/40/14.7
    Raymond Chester
    70-81 364/5013/48/13.8
    Riley Odoms
    72-83 396/5755/41/14.5 (2 yrs inactive)
    There are a few others in the same area code, timeline and stat wise.
    Why Charlie Sanders instead of one of these guys?

    Now to my TURD induction of the day......yepp...you know where I am going here don;t ya? Yes...Michael (cocaine snorting, ho' train leading (kinda envious here) reverse bigoted dirtbag) Irvin!
    What actually qualifies Michael Irvin? He did play on 3 SB teams, he was I will admit, a very good receiver. Is he or was he better than Art Monk? Was he better than ohhh say...Gary Clark?? Gary Clark caught as many TD passes in Super Bowls as Irvin did. Think anyone will ever beg for Clark to be inducted?
    Think I'm wrong? Lets look at some stats .
    Michael Irvin 5 pro bowls
    88-99 750 recpts/11904 yds/65 TD/15.8 per catch

    Gary Clark 4 pro bowls
    85-95 699/10856/65/15.5
    Noticethat Clark had as many tds and almost the same yds per catch? Clark spent a couple years on a couple shitty teams at the end of his career(2 yrs Arizona,,,nuff said) Irvin had the benefit of a HOF QB, the all time league rushing leader and arguably one of the best offensive lines ever assembled.
    Naaaaa Gary Clark isnt as good as Michael Irvin you say...ok..here are a couple more guys with similar stats and no HOF consideration.

    Here is Monks stats 3 pro bowls
    80-95(he was only active 3 games in 95) 940/12721/68/13.5 He did however own the league recrd for some time for receptions....no biggie I guess! Oh and if memory serves me, the same amount of SB rings all while playing for a revolving door at QB.

    Harold Jackson 5 pro bowls
    68-83 (not exactly the pass happy years) 579/10372/76/17.9
    hmmmmm 2 yds per catch better and 11 more TD catches.

    Henry Ellard 3 pro bowls
    83-98 (inactive 97-98) 814/13777/65/16.9
    hmmm...more yards,,,more yards per catch.....hmm

    Jimmy Smith 5 pro bowls
    92-05 (92-93 inactive) 862/12287/67/14.2
    about the same yrs actually playing, couple more tds and a few more yards. Yards per catch are close.

    Ok.....so compare these guys...for real and is anyone going to be clamoring for Harold Jackson, Gary Clark or Jimmy Smith to be put in the HOF? The stats for these guys are almost identical. I have never seen Art Monk, Gary Clark, Henry Ellard, Harold Jackson or Jimmy Smith on the front page of any paper for being arrested for anything. Is that the difference between these players....media coverage? Michael Irvin is employed by ESPN spouting shit at every possible opportunity while the rest of them just live their lives and stay out trouble.

    Bottom line.....Jim Marshall should be in the HOF WAYYYYY before these guys simply for his consecutive games streak not to mention he played at a very high level in doing so! Cal Ripken made it into the baseball HOF by being a very solid, good player but not spectactular.
    Let me know if Cal could have played in every game for 18 yrs getting into a car wreck on every play!


    Hall of Fame = Hall of visiblity
    End of rant....Thanks for the time!
    moviking
    SKOL VIKES!!
    All Hail Bud!!

  2. #2
    BadlandsVikings's Avatar
    BadlandsVikings is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    26,567

    Re: Time for a HOF rant

    welcome to the site

    SKOL!!

  3. #3
    Garland Greene's Avatar
    Garland Greene is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    A, A
    Posts
    6,170

    Re: Time for a HOF rant

    for someone who has been lurking should know that there is already a very long running post about the exact same thing. Welcome to the site but to make it easy for the mods and not start another thread that already exists and post in the correct forum.

  4. #4
    moviking's Avatar
    moviking is offline Training Camp
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    38

    my bad

    Sorry, I haven;t seen that post!
    I shall try to do a little more homework next time!
    SKOL VIKES!!
    All Hail Bud!!

  5. #5
    ultravikingfan's Avatar
    ultravikingfan is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    24,514

    Re: my bad

    "moviking" wrote:
    Sorry, I haven;t seen that post!
    I shall try to do a little more homework next time!
    Don't mind him or anybody else that welcomes a new member like that.

    Great post my friend.
    Keep it up and keep 'em coming!

  6. #6
    ultravikingfan's Avatar
    ultravikingfan is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    24,514

    Re: Time for a HOF rant

    "THEBIGDADDY" wrote:
    for someone who has been lurking should know that there is already a very long running post about the exact same thing. Welcome to the site but to make it easy for the mods and not start another thread that already exists and post in the correct forum.
    Where did he say he was lurking?

    How about a "welcome to the site" instead of a correction you have no business handing out?
    That's about enough of that kind of crap here.

  7. #7
    Webby's Avatar
    Webby is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Aug 1998
    Location
    A, A
    Posts
    8,976
    Blog Entries
    6

    Re: Time for a HOF rant

    "THEBIGDADDY" wrote:
    for someone who has been lurking should know that there is already a very long running post about the exact same thing. Welcome to the site but to make it easy for the mods and not start another thread that already exists and post in the correct forum.
    Why, I shoulda slammed you on your first post.
    Good work.

  8. #8
    Garland Greene's Avatar
    Garland Greene is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    A, A
    Posts
    6,170

    Re: Time for a HOF rant

    You call it slamming I just call it a little bit of helpful advise. I have been told the same thing on a couple occasions. And yes I Did welcome him.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    919

    Re: Time for a HOF rant

    welcome to the site, moviking!! great post, and i look forward to reading more of your posts!
    "God has blessed me tremendously. I'd be a fool to complain."
    "From what I understand, the coaches will put the best 11 on the field."
    -Tyrell Johnson

  10. #10
    Ltrey33 is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    8,618

    Re: my bad

    "moviking" wrote:
    Sorry, I haven;t seen that post!
    I shall try to do a little more homework next time!
    All good in the 'hood brotha! Welcome to the site!

    Hall of visibility....VERY good post.

    I do have to disagree a bit about Peyton though. I think Peyton did deserve MVP in some regard because of his command of that offense. He's really half quarterback and half offensive coordinator and it would be interesting to see how many pass plays he checked out of to give the ball to Addia or Rhodes.

    That said, I think that Rhodes or Addai would be viable candidates!

    I also don't think one Super Bowl MVP will make or break Peyton for his career as far as the HOF goes. His stats have been as good as Marino's to this point in their careers (and he has the single season TD pass record) and he has now won the ever elusive Super Bowl. IMO, Peyton's MVP will have little to do with his HOF induction other than a footnote.

    Welcome again!

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Viking spends his down time lifting others up
    By Zeus in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-11-2009, 09:42 AM
  2. Long Time Viking Fan
    By Asrez in forum Free Beer!
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 11-28-2008, 07:18 PM
  3. Replies: 138
    Last Post: 06-29-2008, 11:16 PM
  4. Favorite Viking victory of all time
    By shockzilla in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 08-13-2004, 08:27 PM
  5. All-Time Viking Team
    By Frozen Tundran in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-11-2004, 08:21 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •