Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21
  1. #11
    V4L's Avatar
    V4L
    V4L is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    20,612

    Re: Team moves R. Owens to fullback

    What do we plan on doing?

    Richardson, Goodspeed, Owens and Kleinny

    All fullbacks unless you consider Jimbo a TE

  2. #12
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,212

    Re: Team moves R. Owens to fullback

    "Vikez4Lyfe" wrote:
    What do we plan on doing?

    Richardson, Goodspeed, Owens and Kleinny

    All fullbacks unless you consider Jimbo a TE
    Kliensasser is & has been a tightend. :wink:

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  3. #13
    Json is offline GM
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,109

    Re: Team moves R. Owens to fullback

    He's probally being moved around to see what he can all do. Being able to play more then one spot is a huge advantage for the guy, to try an make himself a spot on the team.

    Remember it is still only April. Many months to come before we know how the lineup looks.

  4. #14
    tastywaves's Avatar
    tastywaves is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,815

    Re: Team moves R. Owens to fullback

    tastywaves wrote:
    "badbois" wrote:
    maybe we should use or 1st rd pick to draft a fullback. just to make sure we have that position locked up....
    No doubt Childress has a Jones about fullbacks. I've been having a hard time with this for some time. Its one thing to start featuring a fullback more, but how many do you really need? I think we have more fullbacks now than receivers. Even if their practice squad guys, spots are still limited.
    Do FB's have a place in MN?

  5. #15
    Zeus's Avatar
    Zeus is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Minnesota.
    Posts
    23,937

    Re: Team moves R. Owens to fullback

    tastywaves wrote:
    tastywaves wrote:
    "badbois" wrote:
    maybe we should use or 1st rd pick to draft a fullback. just to make sure we have that position locked up....
    No doubt Childress has a Jones about fullbacks. I've been having a hard time with this for some time. Its one thing to start featuring a fullback more, but how many do you really need? I think we have more fullbacks now than receivers. Even if their practice squad guys, spots are still limited.
    Do FB's have a place in MN?
    Nice thread dredge. You channeling Prophet today?

    =Z=

    Thanks to Josdin for the awesome sig!

  6. #16
    i_bleed_purple's Avatar
    i_bleed_purple is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canadialand
    Posts
    16,776
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Team moves R. Owens to fullback

    Geez, I was gonna say that I thought we got rid of Owens a while ago... only to see its 4 years old.

  7. #17
    tastywaves's Avatar
    tastywaves is offline Ring of Fame
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,815

    Re: Team moves R. Owens to fullback

    Zeus wrote:
    tastywaves wrote:
    tastywaves wrote:
    "badbois" wrote:
    maybe we should use or 1st rd pick to draft a fullback. just to make sure we have that position locked up....
    No doubt Childress has a Jones about fullbacks. I've been having a hard time with this for some time. Its one thing to start featuring a fullback more, but how many do you really need? I think we have more fullbacks now than receivers. Even if their practice squad guys, spots are still limited.
    Do FB's have a place in MN?
    Nice thread dredge. You channeling Prophet today?

    =Z=
    It was mostly for Marrdro's benefit. Bringing up some of this regime's history with fullbacks as he continues his discussion on whether or not the FB has a place anymore.

  8. #18
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,899

    Re: Team moves R. Owens to fullback

    tastywaves wrote:
    tastywaves wrote:
    "badbois" wrote:
    maybe we should use or 1st rd pick to draft a fullback. just to make sure we have that position locked up....
    No doubt Childress has a Jones about fullbacks. I've been having a hard time with this for some time. Its one thing to start featuring a fullback more, but how many do you really need? I think we have more fullbacks now than receivers. Even if their practice squad guys, spots are still limited.
    Do FB's have a place in MN?
    Isn't there a yutz on here who keeps saying the FB is a dead position?
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

  9. #19
    marstc09's Avatar
    marstc09 is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Phoenix, Arizona
    Posts
    23,179

    Re: Team moves R. Owens to fullback

    Marrdro wrote:
    tastywaves wrote:
    tastywaves wrote:
    "badbois" wrote:
    maybe we should use or 1st rd pick to draft a fullback. just to make sure we have that position locked up....
    No doubt Childress has a Jones about fullbacks. I've been having a hard time with this for some time. Its one thing to start featuring a fullback more, but how many do you really need? I think we have more fullbacks now than receivers. Even if their practice squad guys, spots are still limited.
    Do FB's have a place in MN?
    Isn't there a yutz on here who keeps saying the FB is a dead position?
    It is on this team. LOL. Tahi=dead!

  10. #20
    Marrdro's Avatar
    Marrdro is offline Beware My Spreadsheet, Bitches!
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    43,899

    Re: Team moves R. Owens to fullback

    marstc09 wrote:
    Marrdro wrote:
    tastywaves wrote:
    tastywaves wrote:
    "badbois" wrote:
    maybe we should use or 1st rd pick to draft a fullback. just to make sure we have that position locked up....
    No doubt Childress has a Jones about fullbacks. I've been having a hard time with this for some time. Its one thing to start featuring a fullback more, but how many do you really need? I think we have more fullbacks now than receivers. Even if their practice squad guys, spots are still limited.
    Do FB's have a place in MN?
    Isn't there a yutz on here who keeps saying the FB is a dead position?
    It is on this team. LOL. Tahi=dead!
    It doesn't matter what FB they have back there. None of you will be happy with him.
    Many many thanks to my talented friend Jos for the new Sig.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v343/josdin00/Vikings/Marrdro_sig.jpg

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. AP with and without a fullback
    By StillPurple in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-15-2008, 10:52 AM
  2. 10-pack: The worst moves (and non-moves) of the NFL offseason
    By singersp in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-14-2008, 12:42 PM
  3. Soccer fan Sofia Loren to strip if team moves up
    By BadlandsVikings in forum The Clubhouse
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 05-29-2007, 06:04 PM
  4. Search is on for fullback - Dugan moves to fullback
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 11-18-2006, 05:46 PM
  5. Backup Fullback position
    By beejry in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-23-2006, 02:04 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •