Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    NodakPaul's Avatar
    NodakPaul is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    West Fargo, ND
    Posts
    17,605
    Blog Entries
    1

    Stadium commission spins Vikings plan around the state

    I searched, but didn't see this article.

    http://www.minnpost.com/jayweiner/2007/11/08/49/stadium_commission_spins_vikings_plan_around_the_s tate

    Here are some very interesting quotes from the article:

    What's new and even intriguing in this Vikes' discussion is a 22-page report that the commission released Wednesday. The data therein have the potential to challenge key assumptions on which government entity should help fund such a project ... allowing, as in every other recent case, the public eventually pays and/or finances these sports palaces.

    This time, on funding, though, think state, the whole state and nothing but the state.
    The report reveals that since 1982, the Metrodome -- which cost, in today's dollars, about $190 million to build -- has generated more than $234 million for the state general fund through Twins, Vikings and Gophers sales taxes, liquor taxes and income taxes. (This is only activity in the Dome, and not some cockamamie surrounding "economic impact.") Through those 25 years, the state has contributed nothing to the Dome's costs of construction or operations.

    Zilch.
    One other big number: 63.

    That was the share that Channel 9 had of viewers for the Vikings' game two weeks ago. Of all Twin Cities TV viewers, 63 percent watched the Vikings play. In this day of zoned news, niche Web sites and bowling alone, the Vikings are as close to a statewide campfire as we get.
    Zeus wrote:
    When are you going to realize that picking out the 20 bad throws this year and ignoring the 300 good ones does not make your point?

    =Z=

  2. #2
    Purple Floyd's Avatar
    Purple Floyd is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    16,646
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Stadium commission spins Vikings plan around the state

    "NodakPaul" wrote:
    I searched, but didn't see this article.

    http://www.minnpost.com/jayweiner/2007/11/08/49/stadium_commission_spins_vikings_plan_around_the_s tate

    Here are some very interesting quotes from the article:

    What's new and even intriguing in this Vikes' discussion is a 22-page report that the commission released Wednesday. The data therein have the potential to challenge key assumptions on which government entity should help fund such a project ... allowing, as in every other recent case, the public eventually pays and/or finances these sports palaces.

    This time, on funding, though, think state, the whole state and nothing but the state.
    The report reveals that since 1982, the Metrodome -- me tawhich cost, in today's dollars, about $190 million to build -- has generated more than $234 million for the state general fund through Twins, Vikings and Gophers sales taxes, liquor taxes and incoxes. (This is only activity in the Dome, and not some cockamamie surrounding "economic impact.") Through those 25 years, the state has contributed nothing to the Dome's costs of construction or operations.

    Zilch.
    One other big number: 63.

    That was the share that Channel 9 had of viewers for the Vikings' game two weeks ago. Of all Twin Cities TV viewers, 63 percent watched the Vikings play. In this day of zoned news, niche Web sites and bowling alone, the Vikings are as close to a statewide campfire as we get.
    That seems a little depressing.

    The facility made 234 million in taxes raised from 3 sports who now will all have their own facilities,so those taxes will be spread over 3 facilities instead of one and you have one 190 million dollar adjusted stadium being replaced by 3 which will probably come in at 1.7 -2.0 billion.

    Did they provide a pie chart that would explain how much additional revenue they need to make those models work? They always seem to be a little vague when they are projecting how much revenue they are going to need to offset the costs of all of these new facilities.

  3. #3
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,271

    Re: Stadium commission spins Vikings plan around the state

    "NodakPaul" wrote:

    I searched, but didn't see this article.
    I saw it over a week ago, but didn't post it since it was written by some Weiner.

    :P

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  4. #4
    COJOMAY is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    7,005

    Re: Stadium commission spins Vikings plan around the state

    http://www.startribune.com/blogs/vikings/
    Love this comment by Kevin Seifert in the Star/Tribune
    Of all the local teams (this side of the river) who either have publicly-subsidized arena/stadiums, are getting public money for stadiums under construction or are seeking public money for new stadiums, the Vikings are the only team that hasn’t traded away or otherwise bid farewell to its its top players (AND PAYROLL) in the calendar year 2007. They’re also the only football team that is either getting public money for a stadium or is seeking public money for a stadium that has won more than one game this season.

    End mini-rant on subsidy hypocrisy in the Twin Cities.
    Kentucky Vikes Fan

    When you require nothing, you get nothing; when you expect nothing, you will find nothing; when you embrace nothing, all you will have is nothing.

  5. #5
    Purple Floyd's Avatar
    Purple Floyd is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    16,646
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Stadium commission spins Vikings plan around the state

    "COJOMAY" wrote:
    http://www.startribune.com/blogs/vikings/
    Love this comment by Kevin Seifert in the Star/Tribune
    Of all the local teams (this side of the river) who either have publicly-subsidized arena/stadiums, are getting public money for stadiums under construction or are seeking public money for new stadiums, the Vikings are the only team that hasn’t traded away or otherwise bid farewell to its its top players (AND PAYROLL) in the calendar year 2007. They’re also the only football team that is either getting public money for a stadium or is seeking public money for a stadium that has won more than one game this season.

    End mini-rant on subsidy hypocrisy in the Twin Cities.
    You are right. They did it 2 or 3 years ago

Similar Threads

  1. Vikings working on plan for publicly owned stadium
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 12-22-2010, 10:16 AM
  2. Replies: 160
    Last Post: 11-28-2009, 07:13 AM
  3. Wilf confident in stadium plan
    By COJOMAY in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 07-27-2007, 04:13 PM
  4. A damper on Vikings stadium plan in Blaine
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 07-22-2006, 12:47 PM
  5. Vikings, Anoka County ready to announce stadium plan
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-20-2005, 05:19 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •