Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 35

Thread: seahawks

  1. #21
    whackthepack is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,535

    Re: seahawks

    I know the Walrus said that alexander is out 2 weeks, but I wouldn't not be suprised if that changes as the week goes along!

    Is he doing it to try and pull a sneaky one over on the Vikes?
    What we've got here is failure to communicate.

  2. #22
    x-ray jeff's Avatar
    x-ray jeff is offline Coordinator
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    812

    Re: seahawks

    If the Vikings can get pressure on Hasselbeck-21to20 VIKES

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    179

    Re: seahawks

    Watched the Seahawks beat the Rams.
    The Seahawks played until the last second.
    The Seahawks looked the same as when they played the Bears in the first half.

    The second half was a different story....

    Hmmm.... If the Vikings play like they did against Buffalo.
    Still too early in the season to see which way the Vikings will go

  4. #24
    HLD's Avatar
    HLD
    HLD is offline Training Camp
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    23

    Re: seahawks

    This game is not even going to be close.
    Yes, the Hawks played close against Detroit and St. Louis, and blew out NY and Arizona.
    The point is that NY and Arizona were played at Qwest, while the other games were on the road.

    So to all the people that have said that the Vikqueens have the same opportunity as the Bears, you are greatly mistaken.
    The Hawks are a much better team at home, and i am not even going to mention the poison pill the fans are going to take advantage of.

    Hawks 35
    viQUEENS 10
    www.seahawkblue.com

  5. #25
    CCthebest's Avatar
    CCthebest is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,270

    Re: seahawks

    Vikes 16
    Seachickens 10

    If its an offensive shootout, vikes dont stand a chance, but our D should step it up without Saun. Smoot covering branch gives me nightmares.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,160

    Re: seahawks

    I'm most worried about Smoot covering, well, any one of their four good receivers. If he can cover them and we can get pressure (and if our passing game can get something going) I think we'll have a chance, but I'm going to have to go with the Seahawks by about a TD or less.
    WE CAN BUILD ON THIS!!!

    In AP I trust

  7. #27
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,266

    Re: seahawks

    "farvathevikinglover" wrote:
    I'm most worried about Smoot covering, well, any one of their four good receivers. If he can cover them and we can get pressure (and if our passing game can get something going) I think we'll have a chance, but I'm going to have to go with the Seahawks by about a TD or less.
    I'm not worried about him covering. I more worried about his tackling.

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  8. #28
    cajunvike's Avatar
    cajunvike is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    32,063

    Re: seahawks

    "HLD" wrote:
    This game is not even going to be close.
    Yes, the Hawks played close against Detroit and St. Louis, and blew out NY and Arizona.
    The point is that NY and Arizona were played at Qwest, while the other games were on the road.

    So to all the people that have said that the Vikqueens have the same opportunity as the Bears, you are greatly mistaken.
    The Hawks are a much better team at home, and i am not even going to mention the poison pill the fans are going to take advantage of.

    Hawks 35
    viQUEENS 10
    Keep on underestimating our Defense...that way, when we shut down your passing game (since you will have NO running game), we can serve you a nice large portion of CROW!!!
    BANNED OR DEAD...I'LL TAKE EITHER ONE

  9. #29
    Vetamur is offline Waterboy
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    2

    Re: seahawks

    First time poster at your fine board.. Hawks fan BUT the Vikings have always been one of my "back up" teams that I have cheered for, going back to Erik Kramer days.

    This week the Hawks got back on track somewhat, next week we get Stevens back.. I think we win but not a rout.
    I think Brad Johnson keeps you in the game and our weakened run game (not a complete lack but definately weakened) also is a factor in the 4th quarter when we wont be able to completely but the Vikes away.

    I call it a 27-24 game with the Vikes making a game of it in the 4th but coming up short.

  10. #30
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,266

    Re: seahawks

    "Vetamur" wrote:
    First time poster at your fine board.. Hawks fan BUT the Vikings have always been one of my "back up" teams that I have cheered for, going back to Erik Kramer days.

    This week the Hawks got back on track somewhat, next week we get Stevens back.. I think we win but not a rout.
    I think Brad Johnson keeps you in the game and our weakened run game (not a complete lack but definately weakened) also is a factor in the 4th quarter when we wont be able to completely but the Vikes away.

    I call it a 27-24 game with the Vikes making a game of it in the 4th but coming up short.
    Welcome to the site Vetamur & glad to have you here.

    I think you mean Tommy Kramer though, LOL?

    I haven't watched Seattle play this year, but what do the fans think of Burleson & are they still miffed over the loss of Hutch?

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Seahawks Fan Here...
    By SLargent1979 in forum Weekly Opponent Talk
    Replies: 150
    Last Post: 10-25-2006, 08:09 PM
  2. SeaHawks
    By RK. in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 09-15-2006, 04:22 PM
  3. Seahawks tix
    By vikeswin2005 in forum Tix & Such
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-31-2006, 11:25 PM
  4. Seahawks
    By sdvikefan in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-28-2004, 04:17 PM
  5. Come on SeaHawks
    By hovan in forum Trash the Pack
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-05-2004, 06:23 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •