Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 37
  1. #1
    Tad7's Avatar
    Tad7 is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,422

    Sacks given up by position

    Sorry if this or something similar has already been posted..I tried the search

    14. Bryant McKinnie (Vikings) 4.0 sacks allowed (12 starts)
    29. Steve Hutchinson (Vikings) 7.0 sacks allowed (16 starts) *PRO-BOWL*
    12. Matt Birk (Vikings) 2.0 sacks allowed (16 starts)
    30. Anthony Herrera (Vikings) 7.5 sacks allowed (16 starts)
    18. Ryan Cook (Vikings) 6.0 sacks allowed (14 starts)
    http://www.wp-wordpress.com/sacks-given-up-by-position
    http://www.cbssports.com/mcc/messages/chrono/13295204
    Skol Vikings! Go Cubs!

    X MARKS THE SPOT

  2. #2
    V4L's Avatar
    V4L
    V4L is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    20,612

    Re: Sacks given up by position

    Not bad.. And Cook is labeled as not even NFL material

    He is where I pretty much expect him to be

    He has alot of room to grow.. And I would like an upgrade.. But as me and a few have pointed out.. Big Mac has the same problems he did, and Marr has pointed out his main problems come from the speedy end rushers that many stuggle with anyway


  3. #3
    ItalianStallion's Avatar
    ItalianStallion is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,615

    Re: Sacks given up by position

    How Jason Peters made the Pro Bowl this year is beyond me...


    I m like a Ja Rule poster, cause I'm off the wall.

  4. #4
    V4L's Avatar
    V4L
    V4L is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    20,612

    Re: Sacks given up by position

    Marrdro will love this

    The Birk and Cook parts

    I'll admit im not the biggest fan of Cook and would like a Tausher kinda guy.. Or even draft a guy and let him compete.. But if Cook stays I would not be too upset

    He has some upside and honestly wasn't as bad as some people like to think.. Some of his penelties and sacks given up were killer though

  5. #5
    singersp's Avatar
    singersp is offline PPO Newshound
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    52,207

    Re: Sacks given up by position

    [size=10pt]Hey Marrdro![/size] Are you reading this!

    [size=13pt]12.
    Matt Birk only 2.0 sacks allowed (16 starts)
    [/size]

    Let me spell it out for you & your cohorts who ride the Birk sux train.

    Birk has given up the least amount of sacks of any linemen on the team by at least a factor of almost 3

    Birk: .125 per game

    McK: .333 per game

    Cook: .429 per game

    Hutch: .438 per game

    Herr: .469 per game

    "If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"

  6. #6
    hav0x is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    325

    Re: Sacks given up by position

    Honestly, Cook isn't that bad of a player, its just all of his penalties that screw us.

  7. #7
    ultravikingfan's Avatar
    ultravikingfan is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    24,514

    Re: Sacks given up by position

    Hutch needs to go.

  8. #8
    VikingMike's Avatar
    VikingMike is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    5,820

    Re: Sacks given up by position

    "ultravikingfan" wrote:
    Hutch needs to go.


    Yeah, he sucks...overrated, pro bowl?!? Bah... ;D
    Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. - H.L. Mencken

    Come from the land of the ice and snow...

  9. #9
    PurplePeopleEaters's Avatar
    PurplePeopleEaters is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,901

    Re: Sacks given up by position

    "singersp" wrote:
    [size=10pt]Hey Marrdro![/size] Are you reading this!

    [size=13pt]12.
    Matt Birk only 2.0 sacks allowed (16 starts)
    [/size]

    Let me spell it out for you & your cohorts who ride the Birk sux train.

    Birk has given up the least amount of sacks of any linemen on the team by at least a factor of almost 3

    Birk: .125 per game

    McK: .333 per game

    Cook: .429 per game

    Hutch: .438 per game

    Herr: .469 per game
    I agree with you about keeping Birk but consider the fact that the dude plays Center. As far as I'm concerned, it's a lot easier to give up a sack to a speed edge rushing DE than to some fat jelly at DT.

  10. #10
    ultravikingfan's Avatar
    ultravikingfan is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    24,514

    Re: Sacks given up by position

    "PurplePeopleEaters" wrote:
    "singersp" wrote:
    [size=10pt]Hey Marrdro![/size] Are you reading this!

    [size=13pt]12.
    Matt Birk only 2.0 sacks allowed (16 starts)
    [/size]

    Let me spell it out for you & your cohorts who ride the Birk sux train.

    Birk has given up the least amount of sacks of any linemen on the team by at least a factor of almost 3

    Birk: .125 per game

    McK: .333 per game

    Cook: .429 per game

    Hutch: .438 per game

    Herr: .469 per game
    I agree with you about keeping Birk but consider the fact that the dude plays Center. As far as I'm concerned, it's a lot easier to give up a sack to a speed edge rushing DE than to some fat jelly at DT.
    +1

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Holcomb on the sacks and near miss
    By singersp in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-25-2007, 06:42 AM
  2. Peppers leads NFL with 11 sacks
    By Prophet in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-15-2006, 08:20 PM
  3. Position-by-position rankings
    By pokeyisme in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-27-2006, 05:19 AM
  4. Mayock's position-by-position rankings
    By COJOMAY in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-04-2006, 09:49 AM
  5. Vikings Sacks!
    By Webby in forum Gameday Previews
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-22-2004, 11:50 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •