Ron Jaworski: Tarvaris Jackson Has Potential

**Prophet** · 09-04-2007, 12:47 PM

[size=12pt]Ron Jaworski: Tarvaris Jackson Has Potential[/size]
Posted Sep 4th 2007 12:22PM
by Michael David Smith

**Purple Floyd** · 09-04-2007, 12:52 PM

In studying him coming into the draft a couple years ago I was very impressed. I thought he had the strongest arm in the draft a couple years ago, but I thought he was very raw and needed a lot of coaching."

Nothing I haven't heard before.

I hope he become an all star and sell out the dome for the next decade but it is at the very best a long shot.

**C Mac D** · 09-04-2007, 12:52 PM

Nice Post.

I just can't wait for this season to start. T-Jack WILL prove all the nay-sayers wrong.

**jessejames09** · 09-04-2007, 12:56 PM

0 ints in the preseason is nice to see.

He didn't throw many bad passes at all. Even against the Cowgurls he was 1-5 but didn't play horribly. I think 2 or 3 were drops.

TJ tends to always try to put the ball where only his guys can make the play.

My prediction; he will be what everyone says he needs to be, a game manager he won't have a tonne of TDs but they will out weigh the ints. And that is whats most important with a good D and running attack.

**snowinapril** · 09-04-2007, 01:07 PM

Ron = Former Eagle
Brad = Former Eagle

Put that together and that equals brown nose.
LOL!

No, I think that the running game that we have is designed to let TJ, a "newer QB," develop slower than throwing him into a passing offense.
He will be able to learn to see and read defenses over a period of time with less pressure.

**cajunvike** · 09-04-2007, 01:17 PM

"jessejames09" wrote:

0 ints in the preseason is nice to see.

He didn't throw many bad passes at all. Even against the Cowgurls he was 1-5 but didn't play horribly. I think 2 or 3 were drops.

TJ tends to always try to put the ball where only his guys can make the play.

My prediction; he will be what everyone says he needs to be, a game manager he won't have a tonne of TDs but they will out weigh the ints. And that is whats most important with a good D and running attack.

Works for me...and it worked for Trent Dilfer and Brad Johnson...all the way to the Super Bowl!!!

**cajunvike** · 09-04-2007, 01:19 PM

I'd be happy with this:

But Ron Jaworski -- in my opinion the single best analyst of quarterback play anywhere -- is sold on Jackson. Jaworski said this today:

"In studying him coming into the draft a couple years ago I was very impressed. I thought he had the strongest arm in the draft a couple years ago, but I thought he was very raw and needed a lot of coaching."

Jaworski said Brad Childress will provide that coaching, and that he's confident Jackson will develop into a consistent quarterback, not a player who makes big plays but follows them with big mistakes.

**jargomcfargo** · 09-04-2007, 01:29 PM

"snowinapril" wrote:

Ron = Former Eagle
Brad = Former Eagle

Put that together and that equals brown nose.
LOL!

No, I think that the running game that we have is designed to let TJ, a "newer QB," develop slower than throwing him into a passing offense.
He will be able to learn to see and read defenses over a period of time with less pressure.

It worked for the steelers and Rothelsburger. He hasn't been the same without the Bus.
It should work for TJ.

**COJOMAY** · 09-04-2007, 01:33 PM

Brad Childress will provide that coaching, and that he's confident Jackson will develop into a consistent quarterback, not a player who makes big plays but follows them with big mistakes.

That sentence makes absolutely no sense to me. Is he saying that Childress will develop him into a QB that will be consistant and average but continues to make big mistakes? If that's the case, then he won't be a good QB. That's one of the sloppiest pieces of writing I've seen.

**C Mac D** · 09-04-2007, 01:37 PM

"COJOMAY" wrote:

Brad Childress will provide that coaching, and that he's confident Jackson will develop into a consistent quarterback, not a player who makes big plays but follows them with big mistakes.

That sentence makes absolutely no sense to me. Is he saying that Childress will develop him into a QB that will be consistant and average but continues to make big mistakes? If that's the case, then he won't be a good QB. That's one of the sloppiest pieces of writing I've seen.

Granted, it's not the clearest writing ever... what it says is that he will be developed into a consistent quarterback. NOT a player who makes big plays but follows them with big mistakes (ie- Brett Farve).