"jargomcfargo" wrote:
"BloodyHorns82" wrote:
I didn't get to catch this game...I was out of town.
From what I've read, Holcomb looked so-so...which I guess would be expected considering on Monday he was playing for the Eagles, and then Thursday he is on the field playing for the Vikes.
Holcumb actually looked very good with the exception of one interception where he had a man open but threw late and short. Had he thrown the ball about a yard and a half longer it would have been a TD. The receiver had a step on the defenders.
Otherwise He looked very sharp and accurate. He is definately a huge upgrade over Bollinger.
Glad to hear that from someone who actually watched the game, and not an ESPN writer who probably wrote everything based off of a box score.