Which repeat threads nauseate you more...Culpepper or Moss?

[NordicNed]

"Webby" wrote:

I say we agree to a ONE WEEK SUSPENSION on all Dante talk. Lock em all!!

But then what would newbs who dont read the rules or check out existing threads do?

LOL. Just kidding, newbs. But seriously.

I'de like to second that thought....

I wouldn't mind at all, a week or two of not hearing PeP's name mentioned once.....

[cajunvike]

It's better than NO ONE posting ANYTHING...plus just think of all the stress that the complainers got to vent in those same threads...just remember, if it doesn't kill you, it only makes you stronger!!! :lol:

[Prophet]

"PackSux!" wrote:

...But was sorta suprised there wasnt a option to choose both.

That was planned. A little something annoying within a thread that is complaining about being annoyed.

[snowinapril]

If it nauseates you, don't go there to that topic.

But, multiple threads, that might just be naus...........

[singersp]

Sorry, but there are reasons for different threads;

There should be a trade thread, but only one. Not one for every team that's interested in him.

I keep everything regarding a trade in the "Vikings agressively shopping C-Pep thread", but I've been berated because it's so long & people want new ones.

To me that doesn't justify creating a new thread. It's one central location for the trade talk.

There are new things that come up daily that need to be added, for instance when the 5 team members spoke out on Daunte's behalf.

If I find an article that's talking about Pep's Rehab, then it has to go in a rehab thread. It doesn't belong in a trade thread.

Pep's contract dispute was neither about his rehab or a trade, so thusly there should be a thread for that. But again, only one.

Face it, there are a lot of different topics that revolve around Culpepper & each should be in it's own unique thread. What I find bothersome is when I see duplications of topics thrown out there just because someone doesn't see it in the column of the of the last 10 forum messages.

When something concrete & factual comes out about DC's status It may merit it's own thread.

There are other threads on players that have multiple threads & if the topics are different it is merited as far as I'm concerned.

Ultra reposted a thread on posting articles earlier today & I wonder how many people took the opportunity to read it.
__________________________________________________ _________

As a side note Prophet, isn't this the 3rd thread today that was started on the multiple DC threads? You just added another one! :razz:

[DeathtoDenny]

Culpepper, because nothing has happened yet, but it rivals Moss' in numbers. Good post.

[Prophet]

"singersp" wrote:

Sorry, but there are reasons for different threads;

There should be a trade thread, but only one. Not one for every team that's interested in him.

I keep everything regarding a trade in the "Vikings agressively shopping C-Pep thread", but I've been berated because it's so long & people want new ones.

To me that doesn't justify creating a new thread. It's one central location for the trade talk.

There are new things that come up daily that need to be added, for instance when the 5 team members spoke out on Daunte's behalf.

If I find an article that's talking about Pep's Rehab, then it has to go in a rehab thread. It doesn't belong in a trade thread.

Pep's contract dispute was neither about his rehab or a trade so thusly there should be a thread for that. But again, only one.

Face it, there are a lot of different topics that revolve around Culpepper & each should be in it's own unique thread. What I find bothersome is when I see duplications of topics thrown out there just because someone doesn't see it in the column of the of the last 10 forum messages.

When something concrete & factual comes out about DC's status It may merit it's own thread.

There are other threads on players that have multiple threads & if the topics are different it is merited as far as I'm concerned.

Ultra reposted a thread on posting articles earlier today & I wonder how many people took the opportunity to read it.
__________________________________________________ _________

As a side note Prophet, isn't this the 3rd thread today that was started on the multiple DC threads? You just added another one! :razz:

Yep, couldn't agree more with everything you said....including the dig on me. This thread is an off-season Festivus thread it appears. The airing of grievances....because we all know that nobody gives a crap what we think but, for some odd reason, we feel better posting it anyways, and, for another odd reason, you are sitting there in front of you computer reading this ridiculously long compound sentence that says absolutely nothing. Congratulations.

[singersp]

"Webby" wrote:

I say we agree to a ONE WEEK SUSPENSION on all Dante talk. Lock em all!!

Because sure as hell, something newsbreaking will come out & we'll all be bitting our finger nails off, sweating profusely & with a gut-wrenching feeling, wonder if we dare go against the Webmasters edict & post it, while visions of banishment race through our brains.

And with me, being one of the first to get on PPO in the morning, I would be one of the first to have my itchy finger on the "submit" & be debating whether or not to pull the trigger.

Oh hell, just shoot me now. :grin:

[sleepagent]

HHmmm.

[WBLVikeBabe]

"singersp" wrote:

"Webby" wrote:

I say we agree to a ONE WEEK SUSPENSION on all Dante talk. Lock em all!!

Because sure as hell, something newsbreaking will come out & we'll all be bitting our finger nails off, sweating profusely & with a gut-wrenching feeling wonder if we dare go against the Webmasters edict & post it, while visions of banishment race through our brains.

And with me, being one of the first to get on PPO in the morning, I would be one of the first to have my itchy finger on the "submit" & be debating whether or not to pull the trigger.

Oh hell, just shoot me now. :grin:

Haha wow and I thought I was obsessed!