Thread: Real fumble...
01-16-2005, 02:55 PM #1
WTF was with that challenge? Claiborne CLEARLY was not out of bounds when he picked up the ball, are these refs paid off or something? That just blew my mind, it was so obvious.
Also I think Cottrell needs to call this game differently on defense, we are not blitzing and our team cannot cover for long periods of time. we also need to bump the receivers. What happened to the aggressiveness of last week?
Then again we did get lucky on the "fumble" by Culpepper.
I m like a Ja Rule poster, cause I'm off the wall.
01-16-2005, 03:01 PM #2Rookie
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
Both feet have to be 're-established' in bounds before you are considered back in bounds apparently.
Looks like the Vikes did get that break back on Culpepepers'non-fumble tho."He either fears his fate too much,
Or his deserts are small,
Who dares not put it to the touch,
To win or lose it all. "
By marcosMN in forum The ClubhouseReplies: 9Last Post: 12-04-2006, 07:41 PM
By Kleinsasser40 in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 7Last Post: 01-17-2005, 05:56 PM
By vikesfan in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 13Last Post: 11-17-2004, 09:55 PM
By VikingsTw in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 56Last Post: 11-17-2004, 09:25 PM
By poult in forum Vikings Fan ForumReplies: 16Last Post: 11-01-2004, 08:12 PM