Re: Rank'em, NFC Norse Position Rankings
"Vikez4Lyfe" wrote:
QB- MN..GB.. CHI.. DET
RB- GB.. DET.. MN.. CHI
WR- GB.. MN.. DET.. CHI
TE- MN.. DET.. GB.. CHI
OL- MN.. CHI.. DET.. GB
S- MN.. CHI.. DET.. GB
CB- MN.. DET.. CHI.. GB
LB- CHI.. MN.. GB.. DET
DT- MN.. DET.. GB.. CHI
DE- MN.. GB.. DET.. CHI
K- GB.. DET.. MN.. CHI
P- CHI.. DET??.. GB.. MN
i agree with you but i think our running back situation is better than detroit, overall our running backs are the best group in the nfl.
gb's receivers arn't that good though i think it's closer to a tie. driver had one good year then last year wasn't that good, yards don't mean too much for a receiver if they can't get touchdowns or the other players can't score.
Only thing we get last in is Punter i guess..
I don t buy Wisconsin cheese.
Bookmarks