Prospects...

**ultravikingfan** · 10-04-2005, 04:51 AM

"WilliamsonOfTroy" wrote:

Ya I know and beleive that we will and need to. But also some proven talent would help to develope the young o-line...but imagine reggie fricken bush in our back field....im drooling over here! lol

I would not take the gamble. I would rather have a stud O Line.

**Mr. Purple** · 10-04-2005, 05:41 AM

Ya but lets say we get one good Oline men...hes still young, will make mistakes and basicaly has a strong chance to be like marcus...you get someone like Reggie and he can be HUGE righ away, even if we got 3 young linemen with the first 3 picks...I think that would make the line worse to start em all the following year, we need guys who are proven to develope the rookies slowly...

**DeathtoDenny** · 10-04-2005, 05:51 AM

I think we should look to Free Agency for O-linemen so we can win while we have Smoot, Sharper and Winfield as well as a 3rd DB (remember Ty Law waiting around?).
Its hard to say who we should draft, because we don't know if a new coaching staff would turn our disappointment players (K. Will, EJ, Mike Rosen-tard, Bryant McKinnie, Nap Harris, Burleson, Culpepper) into better players who don't fall apart on the road.

**finnishvikingsfan** · 10-04-2005, 06:03 AM

I would like Mathias Kiwanuka. Possibly a Deangelo Williams. I wouldnt mind having Bush or Maroney. Of course Hawk or Carpenter from Ohio state. Of course a Tight end or linemand and a safety later on.

**ItalianStallion** · 10-04-2005, 06:21 AM

I say go Oline or RB. I hear this upcoming draft has a lot of good OT prospects, but someone like Reggie Bush would be hard to pass up if he dropped.

**FuadFan** · 10-04-2005, 06:32 AM

I don't know about O-line most guys in the first round would be tackles and is it wise to tie so much money up in that when McKinnie is a good lineman and Rosenthal has 4 more years on his contract. Linebackers would be tough as well because we have so many young underachiving LBs already and at running back Moore could be our RB for the future.

**Mr. Purple** · 10-04-2005, 06:33 AM

Passing on Reggie Bush is just as bad as trading the NFL's best WR....we've accomplished one...now I only pray we dont accomplish the other...

**FuadFan** · 10-04-2005, 06:37 AM

"WilliamsonOfTroy" wrote:

Passing on Reggie Bush is just as bad as trading the NFL's best WR....we've accomplished one...now I only pray we dont accomplish the other...

So far this year and I hate to admit this but T.O. is the best WR Moss has been a under achiever so far.

**vikes&hawks4life** · 10-04-2005, 06:58 AM

I think we should all be hoping that we cant draft Bush becuase that would mean we would be one of the 5 or so worse records. I like the A.J. Hawk pick or Chad Greenway from Iowa. Napo has done nothing to impress me this year and doesnt seem to be the answer. We should have tried to get Woodson in the trade becuase Napo will be gone in a year or two and we will have got nothing besides williamson for moss.
There will be alot of talent available at OLine, RB, and LB positions next year and that is good news for the Vikings.