Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 66
  1. #21
    greg is offline Training Camp
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    46

    projected standings

    bigdaddy, thank you giving standings, and not just dogging my opinions. what makes you guys think pack will be so bad this year?
    God Bless Pat Tillman

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    969

    greg is a jack@ss

    greg, why do you find a need to put down my hometown? you came on here and started your sh!t and i gave you oportunities to offer up inteligent arguements on your positions. you only prove to me and everyone here how childish and moronic you are. "i lost the arguement, so your town is a dump." what the f#ck is that all about? i'll have you know that i'm one of the few people here who don't generalize packer fans, or crack on wisconsin all the time. a piece of advice... college is a time of learning and growing into an adult. i hope you use your time wisely, because you sure have a long way to go. i happen to love my town. :thumbright:
    "ted nugent called. he wants his shirt back."-george clooney, ocean s eleven

  3. #23
    VikemanX84 is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,433

    projected standings

    Personally, if the Packers stick to Ahman Green running teh ball and give Favre a limited role, I think they have a shot at 10 wins.

    However, this is a team that peaked against really bad teams and feel victim to good ones. There schedule this year includes less of a list of possible really bad teams.

    They do have the same team returning, but thats not really a good thing, in this day and age of football (No Dynasty team) you're either growing or you're dying. The packers are definitely not growing, which means they are dying. How you think they can actually do better with the same crappy team, in which they needed a lot of luck to 10 wins last season, is beyond me. However, Packer fans have a reputation for being idiots...


    Vikings 13-3
    Bears 10-6
    Packers - 8-8
    Lions 7-9

    If the pack gets lucky, and the Lions have a few injuries.
    When it s all said and done, you ll have to admit we re number 1!

  4. #24
    superior230bartime is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    431

    projected standings

    How do you figure there was luck involved in the Packers getting 10 wins? Go ahead and say there was luck involved in us winning the division if it makes you feel better but all their wins were legitimate and many were pretty convincing ones. Also, they could very easily have been 12-4 if not 13-3 last year. They for sure could have easily beat Philly and KC. And also the Cardinals. I personally don't think they will be 13-3 but there was no luck involved in them getiing 10 wins. Or am I wrong Vikeman? You are "the man of facts" so bring them if you have them.
    purplepride.org: Home of Disillusioned Vikings Fans World-wide

  5. #25
    hawaiianvike21 is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    3,412

    projected standings

    I dont get it. Right after telling greg the packers wont get 13 wins this season, we go out and say our team is gonna win 13 or 12, which is a pretty high number for a hard schedule this season. Im not putting down our team but i dont think we are gonna get that much wins this season. We have a tough schedule and almost the same schedule as green bay.

    Remeember our d must get used to cottrells system. Its not easy trying to adapt to o learys scheme last year and have to change again this year for cottrell whether or not they run the 4-3.
    Just trying to be realistic here but it seems some of us are eating crow already in a way.
    Hupo oe ke kau ana i ka waiupa a ma kou pa o & Hupo na Po o waiupa a


  6. #26
    triedandtruevikesfan is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    5,588

    projected standings

    I believe whole heartedly that we can go 12-4 this year. What I'm having a hard time understanding is superiors statement... "Also, they could very easily have been 12-4 if not 13-3 last year. They for sure could have easily beat Philly and KC. And also the Cardinals" If it could have been so easily done... why wasn't it?? why didn't you beat those teams? why didn't you finish the season that strong? Why didn't you make it to the superbowl??? And the pack is declining... Favre is gettin old... and who else is there really? He makes your receivers look good and then there is ahman green... can't win games with one RB

  7. #27
    Hawgski is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    362

    projected standings

    Couldn't agree more. They are on the down hill for sure. They will be very fortunate to play .500 ball.


    sig courtesy of PPE

  8. #28
    Hawgski is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    362

    projected standings

    "Hawgski" wrote:
    Couldn't agree more. They are on the down hill for sure. They will be very fortunate to play .500 ball.
    /


    sig courtesy of PPE

  9. #29
    SHOW-TIME's Avatar
    SHOW-TIME is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    331

    projected standings

    Vikes 12-4
    Lions 9-7
    Pack 6-10
    Bears 4-12
    so yeah eatingpieinbed some friends of mine http://www.purevolume.com/eatingpieinbed

  10. #30
    badshack is offline Waterboy
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    9

    projected standings

    I'd have to say,

    Vikings: 11-5
    Bears: 9-7
    Packers: 8-8
    Lions: 5-11

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Projected Stat Line for Vikings 2009 Offense
    By TheBlackChip in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-21-2009, 04:47 PM
  2. Replies: 141
    Last Post: 07-06-2008, 02:53 PM
  3. Replies: 31
    Last Post: 03-16-2008, 06:03 AM
  4. 2007 Projected Salary Cap numbers
    By Zeus in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-15-2007, 07:03 AM
  5. Sack & TKL projected leaders
    By Prophet in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-06-2006, 12:06 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •