Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 33
  1. #11
    ejmat is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    8,849

    Re: Pro-Bowl may be looking very Vikings friendly....

    "Mr" wrote:
    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    I am only interested in them playing through January. Not in Feb.
    The Super Bowl is in February.
    ;D


    And as far as McKinnie goes, he has played very well this season.

    But not better than Flozell Adams or David Diehl, I guess he could be considered at the #3.
    I believe McKinnie is banned from making the probowl due to his suspension this year.
    Not positive but pretty sure abou tthat

  2. #12
    i_bleed_purple's Avatar
    i_bleed_purple is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Canadialand
    Posts
    16,778
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Pro-Bowl may be looking very Vikings friendly....

    "ejmat" wrote:
    "Mr" wrote:
    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    I am only interested in them playing through January. Not in Feb.
    The Super Bowl is in February.
    ;D


    And as far as McKinnie goes, he has played very well this season.

    But not better than Flozell Adams or David Diehl, I guess he could be considered at the #3.
    I believe McKinnie is banned from making the probowl due to his suspension this year.
    Not positive but pretty sure abou tthat
    no, he's allowed, only suspensions due to banned substances aren't allowed in the pro bowl.
    Since their performance might be a result of the substances.

  3. #13
    Purple Floyd's Avatar
    Purple Floyd is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    16,646
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Pro-Bowl may be looking very Vikings friendly....

    "Mr" wrote:
    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    I am only interested in them playing through January. Not in Feb.
    The Super Bowl is in February.
    ;D


    And as far as McKinnie goes, he has played very well this season.

    But not better than Flozell Adams or David Diehl, I guess he could be considered at the #3.
    Then I guess I only want them to get to the NFC Championship.

  4. #14
    hailtocarter's Avatar
    hailtocarter is offline Asst. Coach
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    598

    Re: Pro-Bowl may be looking very Vikings friendly....

    "SKOL" wrote:
    I've never claimed to be fully informed on our special teams..., and thus it seemed odd to me that two of these five "experts" voted for Eric Frampton for special teams ace.

    Sheesh, I guess I'll watch him a lot closer in the future.
    I've payed attention a little more than most years(since we sucked it up big time early on) and he is a stud.
    Seems like he's always the first guy down the field on kickoffs/punts and I bet he helped save some more big returns and/or touchdowns than we already have this year.
    Keep an eye on him if you have a chance.

  5. #15
    patistheman's Avatar
    patistheman is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    231

    Re: Pro-Bowl may be looking very Vikings friendly....

    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    "Mr" wrote:
    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    I am only interested in them playing through January. Not in Feb.
    The Super Bowl is in February.
    ;D


    And as far as McKinnie goes, he has played very well this season.

    But not better than Flozell Adams or David Diehl, I guess he could be considered at the #3.
    Then I guess I only want them to get to the NFC Championship.
    Did you see Diehl get his ass handed to his butt whooped last night by ware.

    Also I believe either Madden or Al said that Adams was penalized more than anybody in the NFL for false starts.
    I don't know how to go about looking that up to prove it though.

  6. #16
    VikesPlusOne is offline Training Camp
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    22

    Re: Pro-Bowl may be looking very Vikings friendly....

    "ejmat" wrote:
    "Mr" wrote:
    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    I am only interested in them playing through January. Not in Feb.
    The Super Bowl is in February.
    ;D


    And as far as McKinnie goes, he has played very well this season.

    But not better than Flozell Adams or David Diehl, I guess he could be considered at the #3.
    I believe McKinnie is banned from making the probowl due to his suspension this year.
    Not positive but pretty sure abou tthat
    Didnt Allen make it last year?

  7. #17
    VikesPlusOne is offline Training Camp
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    22

    Re: Pro-Bowl may be looking very Vikings friendly....

    "hailtocarter" wrote:
    "SKOL" wrote:
    I've never claimed to be fully informed on our special teams..., and thus it seemed odd to me that two of these five "experts" voted for Eric Frampton for special teams ace.

    Sheesh, I guess I'll watch him a lot closer in the future.
    I've payed attention a little more than most years(since we sucked it up big time early on) and he is a stud.
    Seems like he's always the first guy down the field on kickoffs/punts and I bet he helped save some more big returns and/or touchdowns than we already have this year.
    Keep an eye on him if you have a chance.
    I think that abdulah or how ever you spell his name is a great special teams player, better than Frampton

  8. #18
    kspurplepride is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    405

    Re: Pro-Bowl may be looking very Vikings friendly....

    Pat and Kevin should both be in the pro bowl this year

    Allen should be a no brainer

    Greenway will likely get over looked as people still think the likes of Urlacher, Briggs, and Hawk deserve are more deserving.

    Winnie will get overlooked... only stat that counts for corners in the voters minds are picks

    Hutch and Mt Mckinnie need to be there, Birk has played decent enough to earn atleast a replacement possibility

    AP is a no brainer

    Frampton is a good pick

    I wish that Madieu had been healthy earlier in the season... guarantee he would have gone as well

  9. #19
    happy camper's Avatar
    happy camper is offline Team Alumni
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,445

    Re: Pro-Bowl may be looking very Vikings friendly....

    I don't care who makes it I just want Winfield to get in there.
    "There is good and there is evil. And evil must be punished. Even in the face of Armageddon I will not compromise."

  10. #20
    ejmat is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    8,849

    Re: Pro-Bowl may be looking very Vikings friendly....

    "i_bleed_purple" wrote:
    "ejmat" wrote:
    "Mr" wrote:
    "UffDaVikes" wrote:
    I am only interested in them playing through January. Not in Feb.
    The Super Bowl is in February.
    ;D


    And as far as McKinnie goes, he has played very well this season.

    But not better than Flozell Adams or David Diehl, I guess he could be considered at the #3.
    I believe McKinnie is banned from making the probowl due to his suspension this year.
    Not positive but pretty sure abou tthat
    no, he's allowed, only suspensions due to banned substances aren't allowed in the pro bowl.

    Since their performance might be a result of the substances.
    Thanks for the clarification my good friend.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Vikings considering Family Friendly seats...
    By NodakPaul in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 02-25-2009, 06:06 AM
  2. MOVED: Pro-Bowl may be looking very Vikings friendly....
    By ultravikingfan in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-16-2008, 02:34 PM
  3. Vikings give Berrian a cap-friendly contract
    By singersp in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 03-12-2008, 09:50 AM
  4. LXXX years of Super Bowl history - Vikings to win Super Bowl XLVI?
    By singersp in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-28-2008, 07:03 PM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-20-2006, 08:08 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •