Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 52
  1. #11
    Viking_Spirit is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,891

    Preseason done-- new predictions

    "packmanxxxi" wrote:
    Who are your back-ups again? A rookie, a guy whos suspended, and a goal line rusher? And this is the Vikings deepest position???? That doesnt say much for the Vikings.....
    First off, Smith is playing against Dallas. So, there's a game where losing Bennett isn't gonna hurt us. And, we don't know how long Bennett will be out. If he's back by the Philly game, we're set. If not, we can live one game with Moe at RB. He did a good job last year at starting RB, and he can do well again.

    I'm not too worried right now.

    Guns don t kill people. Chuck Norris kills people.

  2. #12
    whackthepack is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,535

    Re: Preseason done-- new predictions

    "packmanxxxi" wrote:
    While the Vikings admittedtly looked better than the Packers, the Packers came out of it unscathed, while the Vikings lost their star runner, with his backup ( a druggie moron) out for 4 games, no matter when they are.

    Just curious what the new predictions are (from those who see things for what they are without the purple shades on)

    I see it now (again, barring unusual inguries ie. Favre, Moss)

    Pack 11-5
    Vikes 9-7
    Lions 8-8
    Bears 5-11

    Ahmann Green has a bruised knee too, the packers injury list is longer than the Vikes your team is the walking wounded! Who are you trying to kid?

    And our offense will be fine our back-ups would be starters on a lot of teams, and our D will be far superior to the pack!!!!!!! :salute: :salute:

    Vikes 12 - 4
    Lions 9 - 7 (tie breaker most points after splitting with the pack)
    pack 9 - 7
    Lions 5 - 11
    What we've got here is failure to communicate.

  3. #13
    ItalianStallion's Avatar
    ItalianStallion is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,615

    Preseason done-- new predictions

    Bennett potentially missing a few games certainly doesn't help but Onterrio is there for the opener if not more (pending his appeal, which seems to have the NFL thinking), Moe is very solid and consistent and had excellent games while starting last year. Mewelde has shown me alot but mostl ikely is not ready to go against starting Defenses in the league, at least not on a consistent basis.

    WE have the depth packman, but don't look for our offense to cost us too many games this season. I am more worried about our LBs and special teams.

    So...How bout Mike McKenzie , wasn't he guaranteed to be in camp by most fans. I guess he really doesn't want to play for the PAckers, can't say I don't blame him.


    I m like a Ja Rule poster, cause I'm off the wall.

  4. #14
    triedandtruevikesfan is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    5,607

    Preseason done-- new predictions

    Once again eternally optimistic TNT is not worried at all. Few reasons... while we may not have our starting RB for the first game our depth is fine at the position. O. Smith will be in that game as will Moe, who is a very consistent rb. I'm very impressed with Moore also. Granted he is unproven but what I seen from him in preseason makes me believe that he is definately going to be an NFL star.

    And even if we had no game at RB, we still have great WR's and TE's. So as IS just said... its the D that worries me... and that doesn't keep me up at night either. They are unproven, but I think they will prove to be good this season.

  5. #15
    Viking_Spirit is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,891

    Preseason done-- new predictions

    Anyone know the scoop on Bennett and when Onterrio is serving his suspension?


    BTW someone come talk to me in the chat, im very bored

    Guns don t kill people. Chuck Norris kills people.

  6. #16
    triedandtruevikesfan is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    5,607

    Preseason done-- new predictions

    I would if I could VS but I can't get into the new chatroom at work

  7. #17
    whackthepack is offline Jersey Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    6,535

    Re: Preseason done-- new predictions

    "packmanxxxi" wrote:
    While the Vikings admittedtly looked better than the Packers, the Packers came out of it unscathed, while the Vikings lost their star runner, with his backup ( a druggie moron) out for 4 games, no matter when they are.

    Just curious what the new predictions are (from those who see things for what they are without the purple shades on)

    I see it now (again, barring unusual inguries ie. Favre, Moss)

    Pack 11-5
    Vikes 9-7
    Lions 8-8
    Bears 5-11

    Unscathed thats what you said? right

    GB Packers
    Position Name Injury Status

    QB Tim Couch Arm Questionable Fri. vs Ten. 9/1
    C Mike Flanagan Knee Probable Fri. vs Ten. 8/30
    RB Ahman Green Knee Questionable Fri. vs Ten. 8/31
    LB Torrance Marshall Hmastring Questionable Fri. vs Ten. 8/28
    TE David Martin Knee Questionable Fri. vs Ten. 8/28
    CB Michael Hawthorne Back Questionable Fri. vs Ten. 8/28
    CB Mike McKenzie Holdout Questionable Fri. vs Ten. 8/28
    DB Chris Johnson Undisclosed P-U-P list. 8/30
    DT James Lee Arm Out indefinitely. 8/25
    T Brennan Curtin Knee Out for the season. 8/24


    I think that is far more injuries than the Vikes have!!!
    Unscathed?
    :bootyshake: :bootyshake: :bootyshake: :bootyshake: :bootyshake:
    What we've got here is failure to communicate.

  8. #18
    cheesefree is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    242

    Re: Preseason done-- new predictions

    "packmanxxxi" wrote:
    While the Vikings admittedtly looked better than the Packers, the Packers came out of it unscathed, while the Vikings lost their star runner, with his backup ( a druggie moron) out for 4 games, no matter when they are.

    Just curious what the new predictions are (from those who see things for what they are without the purple shades on)

    I see it now (again, barring unusual inguries ie. Favre, Moss)

    Pack 11-5
    Vikes 9-7
    Lions 8-8
    Bears 5-11
    I see somebody's wearing green shades and getting high on cheese gas. The Packers couldn't win the division on their own last year, and they won't be getting any gifts from the Vikings this year.

    Packers finish an irrelevant 3rd behind the division champion Vikes and #2 Detroit.
    [b:6191debc1d]it ain t easy being cheesy[/b:6191debc1d]
    [img:6191debc1d]http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid137/p834fa46b07efd9e3efdcb7cb577f214e/f73f7170.jpg[/img:6191debc1d]

  9. #19
    LoviesBears is offline Rookie
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    52

    Preseason done-- new predictions

    Bears finish 1st, lions 2nd and the vikes and packers tied for last where the two belong!!!

  10. #20
    jackyl's Avatar
    jackyl is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,662

    Preseason done-- new predictions

    "LoviesBears" wrote:
    Bears finish 1st, lions 2nd
    LMFAO :lol:

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Preseason Predictions Prove Wrong
    By COJOMAY in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-06-2007, 09:45 AM
  2. PRESEASON Predictions --- Week 1
    By CulpepperViking16 in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-14-2005, 03:20 AM
  3. Preseason
    By SHOW-TIME in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-05-2005, 04:39 PM
  4. Preseason
    By triedandtruevikesfan in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 03-24-2004, 10:24 PM
  5. this is our preseason........
    By nzviking in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-21-2003, 04:26 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •