-
03-09-2013, 10:09 AM #21
Kevin Ogletree seems like an interesting experiment. Wouldn't cost us much and it is right up Spielman's alley.
-
03-09-2013, 11:30 AM #22
Asst. Coach
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 506
-
03-09-2013, 12:52 PM #23
Rookie
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Posts
- 50
Singer, I think it's pretty obvious you are splitting hairs on this one...we're more run based than 80% of the league. Clearly our offence is going to run through Peterson as much as possible this year.
Back OT, did anyone see that the Chargers are reportedly giving Danario Alexander the low tender? That would mean no compensation if they signed him and the Bolts didn't match. He'd help our offence more than Wallace or Jennings IMO...and at probably half the price .
-
03-09-2013, 08:14 PM #24
Obvious to who? It's obvious we ran the ball as much as we passed it last year, that's 50/50 split, not a "run 1st" team.
Ponder was throwing passes right & left to Harvin until he got hurt. AD had 43% of his 348 runs in the first half of the season and 57% of his total in the last half.
Sure we ran the ball more than several passing teams in the league who might have had a 70/30 or 60/40 split, but that is not what makes a team a "run 1st team".
What makes a team a "run first" team is running the ball a higher percentage of the time than passing it, which we haven't done since 2008. Even then it was a 53%/47% split with 5% of that being QB runs, many of which weren't designed runs.Last edited by singersp; 03-09-2013 at 08:20 PM.

"If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"
-
03-11-2013, 11:21 AM #25
Based on the fact that our primary focus and strength is in running the ball. Based on the fact that we had RB with over 2000 yards last year. Based on the fact that anyone we play is focused on how do they stop us from running the ball. Based on the fact that are woeful passing game is set up by our running game. Based on the fact that the players we put under contract and what we ask them to do is primarily to aid in running the ball. Based on the fact that we treat the passing game as an after thought and seem quite content with it. Based on the fact that Leslie says we are a team focused on controlling the line of scrimmage, managing the clock, playing physical and making them try to stop our running game.
If the term "run first" is synonymous to you with how many plays you run vs. pass then I can change it to "a team that is focused on running the ball more than passing it".
-
03-11-2013, 12:33 PM #26
Ring of Fame
- Join Date
- Dec 1969
- Posts
- 3,836
-
03-11-2013, 01:40 PM #27
Have to believe that the Vikings will land either Wallace of Jennings now. Is it possible that the Vikings could look at Cruz now that they have another 1st rd pick? I would say no to that, and just go after Wallace or Jennings and keep the picks.
-
03-11-2013, 07:27 PM #28
Rookie
- Join Date
- Feb 2013
- Posts
- 50
-
03-11-2013, 07:58 PM #29
Change it to what you want. We still pass the ball as much or more than we run it. That is not what I call a "run 1st team" nor do I believe we are always more focused on the run or that our passing game is an afterthought. The numbers speak for themselves. What we are is a team that is trying to be equally balanced in running & passing in a passing league. We try and control the game by running the ball & with short accurate passes with YAC. That also means we do run more than those teams that are passing teams and of course since running the ball is 50% of our game rather than a small part of it & our passing game is mostly 5 yard dumps & behind the LOS passes, defenses are going to try & stop our strong point & not focus as much on the passing game. Thing is defenses can stack the box to try & stop our running game & that also puts them in a prime spot to take away our passing game as well.
Last edited by singersp; 03-11-2013 at 08:01 PM.

"If at first you don't succeed, parachuting is not for you"
-
03-11-2013, 11:12 PM #30
Asst. Coach
- Join Date
- Sep 2011
- Posts
- 506
I favor getting an unrestricted free agent wide receiver rather than a restricted free agent like Cruz.
If you get an UFA receiver, you retain both first round picks and should end up with three very good players instead of two.
Why end up with two very good players when you can have three ?Last edited by smegmavike; 03-12-2013 at 11:42 AM.



Reply With Quote





Bookmarks