Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 36
  1. #1
    enlvikeman's Avatar
    enlvikeman is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,395

    Point proven again

    The right call made...poor execution by Viking players.
    It's not Childress's fault Rice drop a td!

    It's not the coach.



    "24 mil under the cap? there are teams 30 mil over the cap, heck that gives us at least 50 mil to spend"

    CollegeGuyJeff circa 2006

  2. #2
    Storm's Avatar
    Storm is offline Pro-Bowler
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    492

    Re: Point proven again

    Yeah because one play proves everything. Right. :

  3. #3
    Webby's Avatar
    Webby is offline Administrator
    Join Date
    Aug 1998
    Location
    A, A
    Posts
    8,976
    Blog Entries
    6

    Re: Point proven again

    "enlvikeman" wrote:
    The right call made...poor execution by Viking players.
    It's not Childress's fault Rice drop a td!

    It's not the coach.
    that they aren't in the right mindset to do their jobs right?
    I am starting to swing the chilly-prep is a recipe for a mess.

  4. #4
    enlvikeman's Avatar
    enlvikeman is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,395

    Re: Point proven again

    Overthrow by Jackson...once again player execution not Childress!

    Missed field goals by Longwell early in the season, etc.
    not Childress's fault!



    "24 mil under the cap? there are teams 30 mil over the cap, heck that gives us at least 50 mil to spend"

    CollegeGuyJeff circa 2006

  5. #5
    baumy300 is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,065

    Re: Point proven again

    Well, most of the players not executing are because of Childress. Some of these guys wouldn't make it on any other team, so by Childress playing/signing them, it is his fault.

    Just like if we were the coach, but chose to play Longwell at QB. If he overthrew a WR, you would be saying "It's not the coaches fault, it's the player who didn't execute." When we all really would know that Longwell shouldn't have been the QB in the first place.

    Not that I'm using the QB example because I don't think Tarvaris is ok or anything.

  6. #6
    CanuckVike is offline Starter
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    278

    Re: Point proven again

    I know this isn't the right place to put this post...but did the refs make a HUGE screwup on the placement of the ball after Taylor fumbled!!!!!????? I looked by on my record and Taylor fumbled it at the Chicago 45 or 46...Shiancoe recovered at about the same spot....they then spotted the ball back near the 50!!!!
    How could they screw that up!!!??? Anyone else notice that???!!!???
    8ed0c24a99f7e44be7931aa4afb7bd88

  7. #7
    Blood Purple is offline Training Camp
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    24

    Re: Point proven again

    I suppose trying to run the ball on 3 and 13 was execution also, that could not be Chilly's fault. The man has to go!

  8. #8
    baumy300 is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,065

    Re: Point proven again

    "Blood" wrote:
    I suppose trying to run the ball on 3 and 13 was execution also, that could not be Chilly's fault. The man has to go!
    True, true. Very good point.

  9. #9
    enlvikeman's Avatar
    enlvikeman is offline Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    1,395

    Re: Point proven again

    "baumy300" wrote:
    "Blood" wrote:
    I suppose trying to run the ball on 3 and 13 was execution also, that could not be Chilly's fault. The man has to go!
    True, true. Very good point.
    more ignorance...what's more important a run on 3rd & 13 or dropped td's by Viking players?



    "24 mil under the cap? there are teams 30 mil over the cap, heck that gives us at least 50 mil to spend"

    CollegeGuyJeff circa 2006

  10. #10
    baumy300 is offline Star Spokesman
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Posts
    2,065

    Re: Point proven again

    "enlvikeman" wrote:
    "baumy300" wrote:
    "Blood" wrote:
    I suppose trying to run the ball on 3 and 13 was execution also, that could not be Chilly's fault. The man has to go!
    True, true. Very good point.
    more ignorance...what's more important a run on 3rd & 13 or dropped td's by Viking players?
    We;; if Childress has so little faith in his WRs that he has to run on 3rd on long, shouldn't it be his fault for not seeking FA's or anyone can help our receiving corps?

    Come on man... You're defending him for that call against the Bears? I'll agree Williamson dropped an easy one, but him dropping passes doesn't excuse Childress and his play calling.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. The 12th overall pick has proven value
    By Marrdro in forum Vikings Offseason/Draft/FA Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-08-2011, 09:11 PM
  2. He does have a point.
    By RK. in forum General NFL Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-18-2010, 09:24 AM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-07-2008, 02:12 PM
  4. Guilty Before Proven Innocent?
    By kevoncox in forum Vikings Fan Forum
    Replies: 99
    Last Post: 04-10-2008, 12:44 PM
  5. Who said every point doesn't count...
    By NordicNed in forum Fantasy Football Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-21-2008, 08:04 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •